Measurement and Sampling of Outputs from Watersheds

  • Daniel J. Nelson
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 1)


The major outputs of materials from drainage basins include water and its associated load of dissolved and particulate material. Since small watershed study areas are manageable research units, the accrual and losses of materials from these prescribed basins may be quantified and related to rate processes associated with hydrologic and geochemical budgets. Accrual and loss processes affect site fertility of the terrestrial environment and losses from the landscape become inputs to associated aquatic environments. Thus, knowledge of the processes affecting the landscape are important for understanding consequent effects on surface waters.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Birge, E. A., and C. Juday: Particulate and dissolved organic matter in inland lakes. Ecological Monogr. 4, 440–474 (1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bormann, F. H., and G. E. Likens: A watershed approach to problems of nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems. Proc. Sixth World Forestry Congress (Madrid) (1966).Google Scholar
  3. Bormann, F. H., and G. E. Likens, and G. E. Likens: Nutrient cycling. Science 155, 424–429 (1967).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bormann, F. H., and G. E. Likens, D. W. Fisher, and R. S. Pierce: Nutrient loss accelerated by clear-cutting of a forest ecosystem. Science 159, 882–884 (1968).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bricker, P. O., A. E. Godfrey, and E. T. Cleaves: Mineral-water interactions during the chemical weathering of silicates. pp. 128–142. In: Trace inorganics in water, (Baker, R. A. Chairman): Washington, D. C.: Amer. Chem. Soc. 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, F. W.: The data of geochemistry. U. S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 770, 841 p., 1924.Google Scholar
  7. Crisp, D. T.: Input and output of minerals for an area of Pennine Moorland: The importance of precipitation, drainage, peat erosion and animals. J. Appl. Ecol. 3, 327–348 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curlin, J. W., and D. J. Nelson: Walker Branch watershed project objectives, facilities, and ecological characteristics. U. S., AEC Doc. ORNL-TM-2271 (1968).Google Scholar
  9. Durum, W. H., S. G. Heidel, and L. J. Tison: World-wide runoff of dissolved solids. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Pub. 51, 618–628 (1960).Google Scholar
  10. Gibbs, R. J.: Amazon River: Environmental factors that control its dissolved and suspended load. Science 156, 1734–1737 (1967).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Golterman, H. L., and R. S. Clymo: Chemical environment in the aquatic habitat. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Vitgevers Maatschappij 1967.Google Scholar
  12. Hartman, R. T.: Studies of plankton centrifuge efficiency. Ecology 39, 374–376 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Interagency Committee on Water Resources. Report 1 (1940) and following at irregular intervals. St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory. Minneapolis, Minn. (A series of reports on sampling and analysis methods for bedload and suspended sediments.)Google Scholar
  14. Juang, F. H. T., and N. M. Johnson: Cycling of chlorine through a forested watershed in New England. J. Geophys. Res. 72, 5641–5647 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Juday, C.: A third report on limnological apparatus. Trans. Wisc. Acad. Sci. Arts, and Lit. 22, 229 (1926).Google Scholar
  16. Kennedy, V. C.: Sediment transported by Georgia streams. U. S. Geol. Surv. Water-Supply Paper. 1668. (1964).Google Scholar
  17. Kobayashii, J.: Chemical investigation on river waters of southeastern Asiatic countries (Report I). The quality of waters of Thailand. Berichte d. Ohara Institute 11, 167–233. (1959).Google Scholar
  18. Lammers, W. T.: Separation of suspended and colloidal particles from natural water. Envir. Sci. Tech. 1, 52–57 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leopold, L. B., and T. Maddock Jr.: The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 252, 1953.Google Scholar
  20. Leopold, L. B., and T. Maddock Jr., M. G. Wolman, and J. P. Miller: Fluvial processes in geomorphology. San Francisco: Freeman 1964.Google Scholar
  21. Likens, G. E., F. H. Bormann, N. M. Johnson, and R. S. Pierce: The calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium budgets for a small forested ecosystem. Ecology 48, 772–785 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Livingstone, D. A.: Chemical composition of rivers and lakes. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper. 440-G., 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller, R. B.: Plant nutrients in hard beech. III. The cycle of nutrients. New Zealand J. Sci. 6, 388–413 (1963).Google Scholar
  24. Nelson, D. J., and D. C. Scott: Role of detritus in the productivity of a rock-outcrop community in a Piedmont stream. Limnol. Oceanogr. 7, 396–413 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, D. J., and D. C. Scott: Microchemical constituents in contemporary and pre-Columbian clamshell, pp. 185–204. In: Quaternary paleoecology, (Cushing, E. J., and H. E. Wright Jr. Eds.). New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. 1967.Google Scholar
  26. Olsen, S.: Recent trends in the determination of orthophosphate in water, pp. 63–105. In: Chemical environment in the aquatic habitat (Golterman, H. L., and R. S. Clymo Eds.). Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Vitgevers Maatschappij 1967.Google Scholar
  27. Packer, P. E.: Forest treatment effects on water quality, pp. 687–699. In: International Symposium on Forest Hydrology (Sopper, W. E., and H. W. Lull Eds.). New York: Pergamon Press 1967.Google Scholar
  28. Reinhart, K. G., and R. S. Pierce: Stream gaging stations for research on small watersheds. U. S. Dept. Agr. Handbook 268, 1964.Google Scholar
  29. Rothacher, J., and N. Miner: Accuracy of measurement of runoff from experimental watersheds, pp. 705–713. In: International Symposium on Forest Hydrolygy (Sopper, W. E., and H. W. Lull Eds.). New York: Pergamon Press 1967.Google Scholar
  30. Rothacher, J., and N. Miner, C. T. Dyrness, and Richard L. Fredrickson: Hydrologic and related characteristics of three small watersheds in the Oregon Cascades. U. S. Dept. Agr. Pac. NW Forest and Range Expt. Sta. 1967.Google Scholar
  31. Slack, K. V.: Effect of leaves on water quality in the Cacapon River, West Virginia. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper. 475-D, 181–185 (1964).Google Scholar
  32. Slack, K. V., and H. R. Feltz: Tree leaf control on low flow water quality in a small Virginia stream. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2, 126–131 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Struxness, E. G., P. H. Carrigan Jr., M. A. Churchill, K. E. Cowser, R. J. Morton, D. J. Nelson, and F. L. Parker: Comprehensive report of the Clinch River study. U. S. AEC Doc. ORNL-4035 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Viro, P. J.: Loss of nutrients and the natural nutrient balance of the soil in Finland. Pub. Forest. Res. Inst. in Finland 42, 1–45 (1953).Google Scholar
  35. Weber, C. I., and D. R. Moore: Phytoplankton, seston and dissolved organic carbon in the Little Miami River at Cincinnati, Ohio. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12, 311–318 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Nelson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations