Advertisement

Quantum and Classical Ballistic Transport in Constricted Two-Dimensional Electron Gases

  • H. van Houten
  • B. J. van Wees
  • C. W. J. Beenakker
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences book series (SSSOL, volume 83)

Abstract

An experimental and theoretical study of transport in constricted geometries in the two-dimensional electron gas in high mobility GaAs-AlGaAs heterostructures is described. A discussion is given of the influence of boundary scattering on the quantum interference corrections to the classical Drude conductivity in a quasi-ballistic regime, where the transport is ballistic over the channel width, but diffusive over its length. Additionally, results are presented of a recent study of fully ballistic transport through quantum point contacts of variable width defined in the two dimensional electron gas. The zero field conductance of the point contacts is found to be quantized at integer multiples of 2e 2/h, and the injection of ballistic electrons in the two dimensional electron gas is demonstrated in a transverse electron focussing experiment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See the review by P.A. Lee and T.V. Ramakrishnan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57 (1985) 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.L. Al’tshpler, Pis’ma Zh.Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 41 (1985) 530 (JETP Lett., 41 (1985) 648 ); P.A. Lee, A. D. Stone and H. Fukuyama, Phys. Rev. B. 35 (1987) 1039.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.P. Umbach, P. Santhanam, C. van Haesendonck and R.A. Webb, Appl. Phys. Lett., 50 (1987) 1289;Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W.J. Skocpol, P.M. Mankiewich, R.E. Howard, L.D. Jackel, D.M. Tennant and A.D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 2347.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Timp, A.M. Chang, P. Mankiewich, R. Behringer, J.E. Cunningham, T.Y. Chang and R.E. Howard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 732; M.L. Roukes, A. Scherer, S.J. Allen Jr., H.G. Craighead, R.M. Ruthen, E.D. Beebe and J.P. Harbison, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 3011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. van Houten, C.W.J. Beenakker, B.J. van Wees and J.E. Mooij, Surf. Sci. 196 (1988) 144; H. van Houten, C.W.J. Beenakker, M.E.I. Broekaart, M.G.J. Heijmans, B.J. van Wees, J.E. Mooij and J.P. André, Acta Electronica, in press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.W.J. Beenakker and H. van Houten, Phys. Rev. B. in press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. V. Sharvin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48 (1965) 984 (Soy. Phys.-JETP 21 (1965) 655 ).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B.J. van Wees, H. van Houten, C.W.J. Beenakker, J.G. Williamson, L.P. Kouwenhoven, D. van der Marel and C.T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. van Houten, B.J. van Wees, J.E. Mooij, C.W.J. Beenakker, J.G. Williamson, C.T. Foxon, Europhys. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Landauer, I.B.M. J. Res. Dev. I.(1957) 223; Z. Phys. B 68 (1987) 217.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Chakravarty and A. Schmid, Physics Reports 140 (1986) 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B.L. Altshuler and A.G. Aronov, Pis’ma Zh. Eskp. Thor. Fiz. 33 (1981) 515 (JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 499 ).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V.K. Dugaev and D.E. Khmel’nitskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 86 (1984) 1784. (Soy. Phys. JETP 59 (1984) 1038 );Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    See also R. Landauer and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B. 36 (1987) 6255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    This phenomenon is also encountered in thin superconducting films, P.G. de Gennes and M. Tinkham, Physics (New York), 1 (1964) 107;Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T.J. Thornton, M. Pepper, H. Ahmed, D. Andrews and G.J. Davies, Phys. Rev. Letters, 56 (1986) 1198; H.Z. Zheng, H.P. Wei and D.C. Tsui, Phys. Rev. B 34 (1986) 5635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Similar experimental results were obtained by D.A. Wharam, T.J. Thornton, R. Newbury, M. Pepper, H. Ahmed, J.E.F. Frost, D.G. Hasko, D.C. Peacock, D.A. Ritchie, G.A.C. Jones, J. Phys. C, to be published.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sharvin contact resistances have been mentioned in the context of theoretical discussions of idealized mesoscopic systems in M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B. 33 (1986) 3020; and Phys. Rev. B, 35 (1987) 4123; Y. Imry in Directions in Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 1, ed. G. Grinstein and G. Mazenko, World Scientific, Singapore (1986) 102; See also B. van de Leemput, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Master Thesis.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B.I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B 25 (1982) 2185Google Scholar
  21. P. Streda, J. Kucera and A.H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 1973.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    K.-F. Berggren, T.J. Thornton, D.J. Newson and M. Pepper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 1769; H. van Houten, B. J. van Wees, J.E. Mooij, G. Roos and K.-F. Berggren, Superlattices and Microstructures, 3, (1987) 497.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    B.J. van Wees, L.P. Kouwenhoven, H. van Houten, C.W.J. Bcenakker, J.E. Mooij, C.T. Foxon and J.J. Harris, subm. to Phys. Rev. Lett.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    H. van Houten, C.W.J. Beenakker, P.H.M. van Loosdrecht, T.J. Thornton, H. Ahmed, M. Pepper, C.T. Foxon and J.J. Harris, subm. to Phys. Rev. B.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    V.S. Tsoi, ZhETF Pis. Red. 19 (1974) 114 (JETP Lett. 19 (1974) 70 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. van Houten
    • 1
  • B. J. van Wees
    • 2
  • C. W. J. Beenakker
    • 1
  1. 1.Philips Research LaboratoriesEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Delft University for TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations