Advertisement

Automated Cytochemistry and the White Cell Differential in Leukemia

  • Dennis W. Ross
  • Avelina Bardwell
Conference paper

Abstract

Automated flow cytochemistry is a new technology which when applied to the problem of the white cell differential in leukemic patients extends the quantitative measure of both leukemic and nonleukemic cells over a greater range of concentrations. The Technicon Instruments Corporation, Hemalog-D automated white cell differential counter was employed in an investigation of leukemic patients with the following results: (a) There is an improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of subclassifying leukemias because of the use of cytochemistry, (b) Automated cytochemistry has increased sensitivity for the detection of both leukemic blasts and mature neutrophils in leukopenic patients, thus aiding in the distinction between early remission and persistent leukemia, (c) The increased precision of the differential demonstrates a linear correlation between the kinetics of different cell types not previously noted.

Key Words

WBC Differential Cytochemistry Leukemia Hemalog-D Chemotherapy. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ANSLEY, H., ORNSTEIN, L.: Enzyme histochemistry and differential white counts on Technicon Hemalog D. In: BARTON, E. C., ed., Advances in Automated Analysis, Technicon International Congress 1970, I. Miami, Florida, Thurman Assoc., 1971, p. 437Google Scholar
  2. BERNARD, J.: Supervision of treatment of acute leukemias: Remarks. Blood Cells 3, 675, 1977 Google Scholar
  3. BESSIS, M.: Blood Smears Reinterpreted. Springer 1977, pp. 187–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BOZDECH, M., BAINTON, D., MUSTACCHI, P.: Partial peroxidase deficiency in neutrophils and eosinophils associated with neutrological disease: a case report with histochemical, cytochemical and biochemical studies. Am. J. Clin. Pathol, (in press) 1979 Google Scholar
  5. DEBAUCHE, R.: Criteria for further scanning or microscopic differential of white blood cells. In: DELAEY, P., ed., Automated Cytochemistry and Haematology Workshop 1, 1978, pp. 60–74Google Scholar
  6. DELAEY, P., ed.: Roundtable. In: Automated Cytochemistry and Haematology Workshop 1, 1978, pp.115–122Google Scholar
  7. GRONER, W., TYCKO, D.: Characterizing blood cells by biophysical measurements in flow. Blood Cells 6, 141–155, 1980 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. MANSBERG, H. P., SAUNDERS, A. M., GRONER, W.: The Hemalog-D white cell differential system. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 22, 711–724, 1974 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ROSS, D. W., BAYER, C.: Evaluation of the Hemalog-D automated white blood cell differential in hematology patients. In: HOF, S., ed., Autoanalyzer Innovationen. Bad Vilbel, FRG, 1979, pp. 127–133Google Scholar
  10. ROSS, D. W., BAYER, C.: Cancer patients monitored by Hemalog-D automated cytochemistry. In: Proceedings of VIII Int. Technicon Congress, (in press) 1980 Google Scholar
  11. SAUNDERS, A. M.: Development of automation of differential leukocyte counts by use of cytochemistry. Clin. Chem. 18, 783–788, 1972 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. SAUNDERS, A. M., GRONER, W., KUSNETZ, J.: A rapid automated system for differentiating and counting white blood cells. In: BARTON, E.C., ed., Advances in Automated Analysis, Technicon International Congress 1970, 1. Miami, Florida, Thurman Assoc., 1971, p. 453Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis W. Ross
    • 1
  • Avelina Bardwell
    • 1
  1. 1.Hematology Laboratories, School of MedicineUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations