Advertisement

When to Do Diffs How Often Should Differential Counts Be Repeated?

  • G. Brecher
  • R. E. Anderson
  • P. D. McMullen
Conference paper

Abstract

Large numbers of differential counts are generated in hospital laboratories by physicians requesting repeat counts, often daily. Their purpose is to detect trends in polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) to monitor infections or therapy with marrow-depressant drugs. Recently, a number of automated differential counters have come on the market to handle the still increasing load of differentials. We proposed that a strategy of performing differential counts only after a significant change in total WBCs had taken place would result in little or no loss of information. Since WBC counts are routinely performed by automated instruments already available in most laboratories, the purchase of expensive differential counters might thus be avoided. To test this thesis, we analyzed 415 successive sequences of WBC and differential counts, each sequence consisting of four determinations within a 10-day period. Criteria for significant trends in WBC and PMN were based on clinical judgment or on recently determined day-to-day physiologic variations. Among 415 sequences examined, only four could be found in which PMN had changed without a concomitant change of equal significance in WBC. It was concluded that the proposed strategy of using WBC as an indicator of developing neutropenia or neutrophilia was sound. It would have resulted in loss of information in about 1% of instances only, at a considerable saving in differential counts.

Key Words

WBC Differential Hemalog D Sequential testing Repeat counts. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    BRECHER, G., KING, L. L.: Utilization of interpretation of laboratory tests. Can the computer help? In: KINNEY, T. D., MELVILLE, R. S., eds., Evaluation and Uses of Automation in the Clinical Laboratory. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institute of Health, Publication # 79–501, 1979 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    STATLAND, B. E., WINKEL, S. C., HARRIS, M. J., BURDSALL, M. J., SAUNDERS, A. M.: A study of variation of concentration of leukocyte types: I. Biological components of variation in healthy subjects. In: Advances in Automated Analysis. Technicon International Congress, Mediad Inc., Tarrytown, New York, 1976 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ross, D., BAYER, C.: Evaluation of the Hemalog-D™ automated white blood cell differential in hematology patients. In: Autoanalyzer Innovation. S. HOF, ed. Technicon, Bad Vilbel, Federal Republic of Germany, 1979, p. 127Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ORNSTEIN, L., ANSLEY, H., SAUNDERS, A.: Improving manual differential white cell counts with cytochemistry. Blood Cells 2, 557–585, 1976 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ENGLAND, J. M., BASHFORD, C. C., HEWER, M. G., HUGHES-JONES, N. C., DOWN, M. C.: Simple method for automating the differential leucocyte-count. Lancet 1, 492, 1975 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. WINKEL, S.C., STATLAND, B.E., SAUNDERS, A.M., OSBORN, H.: Within day physiologic variation of leukocyte types in healthy subjects as assayed by two automated leukocyte differential systems. Br. J. Haematol. (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Brecher
    • 1
  • R. E. Anderson
    • 2
  • P. D. McMullen
    • 2
  1. 1.Biology and Medicine Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Donner LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations