Advertisement

Current Progress and Future Prospects in NMR Imaging

  • W. S. Hinshaw
  • E. R. Andrew
  • P. A. Bottomley
  • G. N. Holland
  • W. S. Moore
  • B. S. Worthington
Conference paper

Summary

NMR is an indispensable analytical and structural tool in physics and many other disciplines. It has recently been applied to imaging by producing a series of thin cross-sections which map the density distribution of protons, especially those with considerable thermal motion, in cellular water and lipids. In this role, it has several advantages : it is non-invasive, does not use ionizing radiation and is without known hazard. Future prospects in NMR imaging will depend not only on the extent to which images of diagnostic quality can be obtained in reasonable short times, but, more importantly, on whether the whole range of NMR measurements and techniques can be applied to achieve a useful degree of tissue characterization and the measurement of blood flow in vivo.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Damadian, R., Apparatus and method for detecting cancer in man, U.S. Patent 3,789,832, filed 17 March 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lauterbur, P.O., Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance, Nature, 242: 190–191, 1973.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrew, E.R., Bottomley, P.A. Hinshaw, W.S., Holland, G.N. Moore, W.S. and Simaroj, C., NMR images by the multiple sensitive point method: application to larger biological systems, Phys. Med. biol., 22: 971–974, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hinshaw, W.S., Image formation by nuclear magnetic resonance, the sensitive point method, J.Appl.Phys.47:3709–3721,1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hinshaw, W.S. and Worthington, B.S., Display of crosssectional anatomy by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Brit. J., Rad., 51: 273–280, 1978 a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bottomley, P.A., In vivo tumour discrimination in a rat by proton magnetic resonance imaging, Cancer Research, 39: 468–470, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hinshaw, W.S., Andrew, E.R., Bottomley, P.A. Holland, G.N. Moore, W.S. and Worthington, B.S., An in vivo study of the fore-arm and hand by thin-section NMR imaging, Brit. J.Rad., 52: 36–43, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mansfield, P. and Maudsley, A.A., Medical imaging by NMR, Brit. J., Rad., 50: 188–194, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Damadian, R., Goldsmith, M. and Minkoff, L., NMR in cancer: XVI, FONAR image of the live human body, Physiol. Chem. and Phys., 9: 97–108, 1977.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clow, H., Head scans by NMR techniques, New Scientist, 80: 588, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mansfield, P., Pykett, I.L., Morris, P.G. and Coupland, R.E., Human whole body line-scan imaging by NMR, Brit. J. Rad., 51: 921–922, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Damadian, R., Tumour detection by nuclear magnetic resonance, Science, 177: 1151–1153, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hollis, D.P., Saryan, L.A., Eggleston, J.C. and Morris, P.H. Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of cancer. J. Nat. Cancer Institute 54: 1469–1472, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoult, D.I., Rotating frame zeugmatography, J. Mag. Res., 33: 183–197, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holland, G.N., Bottomley, P.A. and Hinshaw, W.S., 19F magnetic resonance imaging, J. Mag. Res., 28: 133–136, 1977.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hayward, R.J., Packer, K.J. and Tomlinson, D.J., Pulsed field gradient spin echo NMR studies of flow in fluids, Molec. Phys., 23: 1083–1102, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. S. Hinshaw
  • E. R. Andrew
  • P. A. Bottomley
  • G. N. Holland
  • W. S. Moore
  • B. S. Worthington

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations