Advertisement

Reliability and Dosimetry fo Computerized Tomography

  • R. S. Ledley
Conference paper

Abstract

Reliability and accuracy in CT diagnosis depends intimately on DOSE. Figure 1 illustrates the difference between the DOSE given by an ordinay x-ray machine and the DOSE attributable to a CT scanner. With ordinary x-rays, as successive x-rays are made the DOSE is accumulated because the same area of the body generally receives the radiation. On the other hand, the CT Scanner radiates only the section being studied and hence, when the next section is made, different tissue receives the DOSE. The DOSE is measured in units of rads, which is the energy absorbed by a unit mass of the tissue being irradiated. However, as shown in Figure 2, CT scans of successive sections can have a slight overlap. The tissue in the overlapping area does receive a slightly larger DOSE than would have been obtained if only a single section had been made. Table 1, taken from McCullough (2), gives a summary of some values of absorbed DOSE for CT scanning. The DOSE depends upon the direction of the x-ray beam and Figure 3 shows some values obtained on phantoms. Dixon et al. (2) describe a system for using film to compute the doses, otherwise the dose evaluation procedure is somewhat complex and is usually carried out by radiation physicists. Figure 4 clearly illustrates the variation in dose between single and multiple sections and from front to back of the patient.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McCullough, E. C., Payne, J. T., “Patient Dosage in Computed Tomography”, Radiology, 129:457–463, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dixon, R. L., Ekstrand, K. E., “A Film Dosimetry System for Use in Computed Tomography”, Radiology, 127:255–258, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCullough, E. C., “Factors Affecting the Use of Quantitative Information from CT Scanner”, Radiology, 124:99–107, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koehler, P. R., Anderson, R. E., Baxter, B., “The Effect of Computed Tomography Viewer Controls on Anatomical Measurements”, Radiology, 130:189–194, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kramer, R. A., et al., “Statistical Profiles in Computed Tomography”, Radiology, 125:145–147, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dixon, R. L., et al., “A Film Dosimetry System for Use in Computed Tomography”, Radiology, 127:255–258, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. S. Ledley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations