The Diagnosis of Small Acoustic Neuromas by Air CT Cisternography and Canalography

  • I. Kricheff
  • R. Pinto
  • R. T. Bergeron
  • N. Cohen
Conference paper


Routine contrast-enhanced CT scans generally cannot exclude the presence of an acoustic neuroma of 1 cm. or less in size (1,2,3). CT — metrizamide cisternography, though excellent in defining a cisternal mass lesion, cannot be visualized intracanalicular unless the acoustic canal is grossly enlarged and therefore cannot exclude the presence of a lesion limited to canal or porus (2). Pantopaque cisternography has so far been the only neuroradiologie examination that can exclude an intracanalicular acoustic neuroma, although the study may be falsely positive in a small percentage of cases (4, 5, 6) and has a potential risk of producing adhesive arachnoiditis (7,8). The presence of pantopaque may also preclude the CT evaluation of the CP angle cistern at a future date.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dubois, P.J., Drayer, B.P., Bank, W.O., Deeb, Z.L., Rosenbaum, A.E.: An Evaluation of Current Diagnostic Radiologic Modalities in the Investigation of Acoustic Neurilemmomas. Radiology 126, 173–179, Jan. 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosenbaum, A.E., Drayer, B.P., Dubois, P.J., Black, O.: Visualization of Small Extracanicular Neurilemomas by Metrizamide cisternographic Enhancement. Arch Otolaryngol 104, 239–243, May 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, K.R., Parker, S.W., New, P.F.J., Roberson, G.H., Taveras, J.M., Ojemann, R.J., Weiss, A.D.: Computed Tomography of Acoustic Neuroma. Radiology 124? 81–86, Jul. 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Novy, S., Jensen, K.M.: Filling Defects and Non-Filling of the Internal Auditory Canal in Posterior Fossa Myelography. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 124 265–270, Jun. 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sones, P.J., Cioffi, C. M., Hoffman, Jr., J.C.: A Practical Approach to the Diagnosis of Cerebellopontine Angle Tumors. Amer. J. Roentgenol 122, 554–559, Nov. 1974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fisch, V.P., Neozoleki, J., Wellaver, J.: Diagnostic value of Meatocisternography. Arch Otolarngol 101, 339–343, Jun. 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bergeron, R.T., Rumbaugh, C.L., Fang, H., Cravioto, H.: Experimental Pantopaque Arachnoiditis in the Monkey, Radiology 99, 95–101,Apr.1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schurr, P.H., McLaurin, R.L., Ingraham, F.D.: Experimental Studies on the Circulation of the Cerebrospinal Fluid and Methods of Producing Communicating Hydrocephalus in the Dog. J. Neurosurg. 10, 515–525, 1953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    George, A.E., Kricheff, I.I.: Catheter Technique for Myelography. Radiology 104, 435–436, Aug. 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Kricheff
  • R. Pinto
  • R. T. Bergeron
  • N. Cohen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations