Applications of a Hybrid-Monte Carlo Sequence to Option Pricing

  • Giray Ökten
Conference paper


The advantages of quasi-Monte Carlo methods diminish, mainly due to practical constraints, as the dimension of the problem grows. This phenomenon has been widely observed in several fields, especially in particle transport theory, and several methods have been proposed to provide remedies for the difficulties faced in high dimensional quasi-Monte Carlo simulation.

One of the methods that has been used successfully in various high dimensional problems will be presented. The advantages of this method will be illustrated when applied to selected problems from option pricing.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. B. Owen,“Latin Supercube Sampling for Very High Dimensional Simulations”, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, Vol. 8, No. 1, 71–102, 1998.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Bouleau and D. Lépingle,Numerical Methods For Stochastic Processes, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Spanier,“Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods for Particle Transport Problems”, Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing 1994, Lecture Notes in Statistics #106, Springer, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Spanier and L. Li, “Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods for Integral Equations”, Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 1996, Lecture Notes in Statistics #127, Springer, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Ökten, “A Probabilistic Result on the Discrepancy of a Hybrid-Monte Carlo Sequence and Applications”, Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 4, 255–270, 1996.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Bratley, B. L. Fox, “ALGORITHM 659: Implementing Sobol’s Quasirandom Sequence Generator”, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 14, No. 1, 88–99, 1988.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. L. Fox,“ALGORITHM 647: Implementation and Relative Efficiency of Quasirandom Sequence Generators”, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Vol. 12, No. 4, 362–376, 1986.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Bratley, B. L. Fox and H. Niederreiter,“Implementation and Tests of Low- Discrepancy Sequences”, ACM Transactions on Modelling and Computer Simulation, 2, 195–213, 1992.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. G. Z. Kemna and A. C. F. Vorst,“A Pricing Method for Options Based on Average Asset Values”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 14, 113–129, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. J. Taylor,“Modeling Stochastic Volatility: A Review And Comparative Study”, Mathematical Finance, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Johnson and D. Shanno, “Option Pricing when the Variance is Changing”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Ökten,Contributions to the Theory of Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, Dissertation.Com, 1999 ( Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Pages and Y. J. Xiao, “Sequences with low discrepancy and pseudo-random numbers: theoretical remarks and numerical tests”, J. Statist. Comput. Simul., Vol. 56, 163–188, 1997.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. M. Sobol’, “Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models”, MMCE, Vol. 1, No. 4, 407–414, 1993.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giray Ökten
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesBall State UniversityMuncieUSA

Personalised recommendations