Higher-Dimensional Properties of Non-Uniform Pseudo-Random Variates

  • Josef Leydold
  • Hannes Leeb
  • Wolfgang Hörmann
Conference paper


In this paper we present the results of a first empirical investigation on how the quality of non-uniform variates is influenced by the underlying uniform RNG and the transformation method used. We use well known standard RNGs and transformation methods to the normal distribution as examples. We find that except for transformed density rejection methods, which do not seem to introduce any additional defects, the quality of the underlying uniform RNG can be both increased and decreased by transformations to non-uniform distributions.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Afflerbach, L. and Hörmann, W. 1992. Nonuniform random numbers: A sensitivity analysis for transformation methods. In G. C. Pflug and U. Dieter Eds.,Lecture Notes in Econom. Math. Systems, Volume 374, pp. 135–144. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Afflerbach, L. and Wenzel, K. 1988. Normal random numbers lying on spirals and clubs.Statistical Papers 29, 237–244.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Box, G.E.P. and Muller M. E. 1958. A note on the generation of random normal deviates.Annals of Mathem. Stat. 29, 2, 610–611.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng, L. Y. and Chhikara, R. S. 1992. Robustness of some non-uniform random variate generators.Statistica Neerlandia 46, 2–3, 195–207.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Devroye, L . 1982. A note on approximations in random variate generation. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 14, 149–158.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Devroye, L. 1986.Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation. Springer- Verlag, New-York.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Eichenauer, J. and Lehn, J. 1986. A non-linear congruential pseudo random number generator.Statistical Papers 27, 315–326.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Eichenauer-Herrmann, J. 1993. Statistical independence of a new class of inversive congruential pseudorandom numbers.Math. Comp. 60, 375–384.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Fishman, GS and Moore, LR 1986. An exhaustive analysis of multiplicative congruential random number generators with modulus 231-1.SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput 7, 24–45. see erratum, ibid. p. 1058CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Good, I. J. 1953. The serial test for sampling numbers and other tests for randomness.Proc. Cambridge Philosophical Society 49, 276–284.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Hellekalek, P. and Leeb, H. 1997. Dyadic diaphony.Acta Arith. 80 187–196.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Herendi, T., Siegl, T., and Tichy, R. F. 1997. Fast Gaussian random number generation using linear transformations.Computing 59, 163–181.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Hörmann, W. 1994a. A note on the quality of random variates generated by the ratio of uniforms method.ACM TOMACS 4, 1, 96–106.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Hörmann, W. 1994b. The quality of non-uniform random numbers. In H. Dyckhoff, U. Derings, M. Salomon, and H. C. Tijms Eds.,Operations Re- search Proceedings 1993 (Berlin, 1994), pp. 329–335. Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hörmann, W. 1995. A rejection technique for sampling from T-concave dis- tributions.ACM Trans. Math. Software 21, 2, 182–193.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Hörmann, W. and Derflinger, G. 1990. The ACR method for generating normal random variables.OR Spektrum 12, 181–185.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Hörmann, W. and Derflinger, G. 1993. A portable uniform random num- ber generator well suited for the rejection method.ACM Trans. Math. Software 19, 4, 489–495.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Kinderman, A.J. and Monahan, F.J. 1977. Computer generation of random variables using the ratio of uniform deviates.ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 3, 3, 257–260.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Kinderman, A. J. and Ramage, J. G. 1976. Computer generation of normal random variables.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 71, 356, 893–898.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. L’Ecuyer, P. 1994. Uniform random number generation.Ann. Op. Re- search 53, 77–120.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. L’Ecuyer, P., Cordeau, J.-F., and Simand, R. 1998. Close-points spatial tests for random number generation, preprint.Google Scholar
  22. Leeb, H. and Hellekalek, P. 1998. Asymptotic properties of the spectral test, diaphony, and related quantities, preprint.Google Scholar
  23. Leeb, H. and Wegenkittl, S. 1997. Inversive and linear congruential pseu- dorandom number generators in empirical tests.ACM TOMACS 7, 2, 272–286.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Marsaglia, G. 1962. Improving the polar method for generating a pair of random variables. Technical Report Dl-82-0203, Boeing Sci. Res. Lab.Google Scholar
  25. Marsaglia, G. 1985. A current view of random number generators. In L. Billard Ed.,Computer Science and Statistics: The Interface, pp. 3–10. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
  26. Matsumoto, M. and Kurita, Y. 1994. Twisted GFSR generators II.ACM TOMACS 4, 3, 254–266.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Monahan, F. 1985. Accuracy in random number generation.Math. Comp. 45, 172, 559–568.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. Neave, H. R. 1973. On using the Box-Müller transformation with multiplicative congruential pseudo-random number generators.Appl. Statist. 22, 1, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Niederreiter, H. 1992.Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods. SIAM, Philadelphia.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Park, S. K. and Miller, K. W. 1988. Random number generators: good ones are hard to find.Comm. ACM 31, 1192–1201.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt, B . 1996. Simplex II, Referenzhandbuch, Version 2.6. Universität Passau. Scholar
  32. Zinterhof, P. 1976. Über einige Abschätzungen bei der Approximation von Funktionen mit Gleichverteilungsmethoden.Sitzungsber. Österr. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Natur. KL II 185, 121–132.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josef Leydold
    • 1
  • Hannes Leeb
    • 2
  • Wolfgang Hörmann
    • 3
  1. 1.Department for StatisticsWU WienViennaAustria
  2. 2.ISOCUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.IE DepartmentBoğaziçi University IstanbulBebek-IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations