Advertisement

Inducing Stress Waves by Underground Nuclear Explosions

  • Valery A. Anikolenko
  • Alexei V. Nikolaev
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASEN, volume 4)

Abstract

Stress waves induced in rocks following earthquakes and their impact on structures have been a subject for discussion in earthquake engineering for many years. As is believed a stress wave is considered to be a very slow wave of deformation which propagates from the epicenter of a strong shock during relatively short time after the event and, then rapidly decays. However, until now there has been no strong evidence of the fact that various damages in structures received during earthquakes were caused, even partially, by stress waves, and not only with the strong ground motion. This problem is of significance for choosing proper structure response criteria for civil and industrial construction in earthquake prone areas. As is expected, stress waves may produce additional impact on structures already damaged by the shock. However it is difficult to detect a stress wave which may exist only for a short time after the event because the exact time and place of earthquake occurrence are usually unknown and usually measuring instruments cannot be deployed in due time.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adushkin VV and Spivak AA (1995) Aftershocks of underground nuclear explosion. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop “Inducing Earthquakes by Underground Nuclear Explosions”: 35–52Google Scholar
  2. Aki K et al. (1969) Near-field and far-field seismic evidences for triggering of earthquakes by BENHAM explosion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 59, No 6: 2197–2207Google Scholar
  3. Anikolenko VA (1992) Kinetics of rock failure. Physical and Seismogeological Fundamentals of Rock Failure Prediction. Nauka, Moscow: 41–46 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. Anikolenko VA (1992) Kinetic study of rock failure in laboratory testing experiments. Acta Montana, No. 3(89): 63–72Google Scholar
  5. Anikolenko VA and Mansurov VA (1994) Rock sample testing under alternating cyclic loads. To be published in the Proceedings of XXIII General Assembly of ESC, Athens, 1994Google Scholar
  6. Anikolenko VA and Mikhailov AI (1976) Electron tunneling in glassy organic matrixes. Doklady AN SSSR, 230: 102–105 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. Growley BK and ermain LS (1971) Energy released in the BENHAM aftershocks. Bull. Seismol. Soc.Am., 61, No 5: 1293–1301Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton RM and Healy JH (1969) Aftershocks of the BEMHAM nuclear explosion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 59, No 6: 2271–2281Google Scholar
  9. Mikhailov AI (1971) Decay of defects in irradiated solids. Doklady AN SSSR, 197: 136–140 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Nikolaev AV (1994) Problems of induced seismicity. Induced Seismicity. Nauka. Moscow: 5–15Google Scholar
  11. Sadovsky MA (1984) On the models of geophysical media and seismic process. Prediction of Earthquakes, No 4. Dushanbe. USSR: 268–273 (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-VerlagBerlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valery A. Anikolenko
    • 1
  • Alexei V. Nikolaev
    • 1
  1. 1.Research and Co-ordinating Center for Seismology and EngineeringRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations