Remote Triggering of Large Seismic Events in Mines: Evidence Based on the Spatial and Temporal Migration of Microseismic Events Along Increasing Stress Gradients

  • Theodore I. Urbancic
  • Cezar-loan Trifu
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASEN, volume 4)


We examine the distribution of microseismicity associated with a sequence of 10 large events (2.1 ≤ M ≤ 3.0) that followed minor development blasts over a 75-hour period in three widely-separated (200–300 m) regions of Strathcona mine, Sudbury, Ontario in June 1988. The microseismicity was observed to migrate between these regions during two intervals without large event occurrences (24 and 38 hours, respectively). The conditions under which remote mobilization of pre-existing structures can occur was investigated by including underground fracture mapping and stress data, fault-plane solutions, and three-dimensional distributions of P-wave velocities. A good agreement was found between dominant nodal plane orientations and lineations in microseismicity with identified fractures. Within the three regions, also corresponding to zones of high P-wave velocity, failure was associated with different fracture sets. The distributions of P and T axes and damage related to the large events, suggested that these events were directly influenced by the regional stress field, whereas the microseismic events appeared to have been influenced by local stress conditions. Based on our results, we propose that the migration in microseismicity can be explained by a transfer of stress along a network of connected fractures that were close to failure. Moreover, the migration followed a path of increasing velocity, suggesting that failure, under the constant lithologic and discontinuity distribution at our site, proceeded along a stress gradient to areas with stresses at or near failure and resulted in the remote triggering of large events on a mine-wide scale. Using these arguments, it can be expected that a highly stressed region could fail as a result of event triggers originating in moderately stressed regions through a quasi-static transfer of stress/strain in the rock mass.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, J. (1987). Canadian crustal strtal stress data-a compilation to 1987, Open File Report 1622, Geol. Surv. Canada, Ottawa, 22 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, C.A., M. Wyss, J.N. Brune, A. Grantz, and R.E. Wallace (1972). Displacements on the Imperial, Superstition Hills, and San Andreas faults triggered by the Borrego Mountain earthquake, in The Borrego Mountain Earthquake of April 9, 1968, U.S. Geol. Surv. Profess. Paper 787, 87–104.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, G.A., J.N. Brune, J.N. Louie, Y. Zeng, M. Savage, G. Yu, Q. Chen, and D. dePolo (1994). Seismicity in the Western Great Basin apparently triggered by the Landers, California, earthquake, 28 June 1992, Bull Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 863–891.Google Scholar
  4. Bharti, S. (1982). Stress measurements at Strathcona Mine; internal report, Falconbridge Nickel mines Ltd., 16 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Bodin, P. and J. Gomberg (1994). Triggered seismicity and deformation between the Landers, California, and Little Skull Mountain, Nevada, earthquakes, Bull Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 835–843.Google Scholar
  6. Brillinger, D. R., Udias, A., and Bolt, B. A. (1980). A probability model for regional focal mechanism solutions, Bull Seismol. Soc. Am. 70, 149–170.Google Scholar
  7. Coats, C. J. A., and Snajdr, P. (1984). Ore deposits of the North Range, Onaping-Levack Area, Sudbury. In The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure (E. G. Pye, A. J. Naldrett, and P. E. Giblin, eds), Ontario Geological Survey, 1, 327–346.Google Scholar
  8. Cochrane, L. B. (1991). Analysis of the structural and tectonic environments associated with rockmass failures in the mines of the Sudbury District, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geological Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Hill, D.P., P.A. Reasenberg, A. Michael, W.J. Arabasz, G. Beroza, J.N. Brune, D. Brumbaugh, R. Castro, S. Davis, D. dePolo, W.L. Ellsworth, J. Gomberg, S. Harmsen, L. House, S.M. Jackson, M. Johnston, L. Jones, R. Keller, S. Malone, L. Munguia, S. Nava, J.C. Pechmann, A. Sanford, R.W. Simpson, R.S. Smith, M. Stark, M. Stickney, A. Vidal, S. Walter, V. Wong, and J. Zollweg (1993). Seismicity in the western United States remotely triggered by the M 7.4 Landers, California, earthquake of June 28, 1992, Science 260,1617–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kisslinger, C. (1976). Earthquakes induced by underground nuclear explosions, Eng. Geol. 10, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maxwell, S.C., T.I. Urbancic, and R.P. Young (1991). Three-dimensional seismic tomography atStrathcona mine, Department of Geological Sciences, Queen’s University, 38 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Naldrett, A. J., and Kullerud, G. (1967). A study of the Strathcona Mine and its bearing on the origin of the nickel-copper ores of the Sudbury district, Ontario, J. Petrology 8, 453–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nikolaev, A.V. (1995). Influence of underground nuclear tests on seismicity: Methods and results, this volume.Google Scholar
  14. Prugger, A. F., and Gendzwill, D. J. (1988). Microearthquake location: a nonlinear approach that makes use of a simplex stepping procedure, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 799–815.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-VerlagBerlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore I. Urbancic
    • 1
  • Cezar-loan Trifu
    • 1
  1. 1.Engineering Seismology Group Canada Inc.Kingston, OntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations