Advertisement

Virtual Endoscopy of the Vessels

  • T. H. Wiese
  • P. Rogalla
Chapter
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

Advances in CT and MRI technology enabling the rapid acquisition of volumetric data sets with high-resolution isotropic pixels or voxels have stimulated dramatic developments in three-dimensional (3D) image postprocessing techniques for clinical use (Rubin et al. 1996). Three-dimensional images rendered from two-dimensional (2D) source data sets facilitate the quantitative and qualitative analysis of complex morphologic and pathologic structures (Roelandt et al. 1994). Although the 3D images created by various rendering techniques in general do not contain more information than the original data sets, they often help the reviewer to grasp spatial relationships, for instance when assessing the extent of a pathologic process (Bartolozzi et al. 1998; Remy et al. 1998). Moreover, 3D reconstructions from sectional images provide new tools for teaching anatomy (Remy et al. 1998).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Auer LM, Auer DP. Virtual endoscopy for planning and simulation of minimally invasive neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 1998, 43:529–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartolozzi C, Neri E, Caramella D. CT in vascular pathologies. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:679–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beaulieu CF, Baker ME, Chotas HG, McCann R, Kurylo WC, Johnson GA. Volume rendering for 3D helical CT of abdominal aorta. Radiology 1993; 198 (P):173Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bongartz GM, Boos M, Winter K, Ott HW, Scheffler K, Steinbrich W. Clinical utility of contrast-enhacend MR angiography. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:S178–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brink JA, Lim JT, Wang G, Heiken JP, Deyoe LA, Vannier MW. Technical optimization of spiral CT for depiction of renal arterial stenosis: in vitro analysis. Radiology 1995; 194:157–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castillo M. Diagnosis of disease of the common carotid artery bifurcation: CT angiography vs catheter angiography. AJR 1993; 161:395–8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis CP, Ladd ME, Göhde SC, Pfammatter T, Fass L, Debatin JF. Virtual intravascular endoscopy in the renal arteries: a new way of reading 3-D MR-angiography datasets. RöFo 1996; 165, 3:257–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis CP, Ladd ME, Romanowski BJ, Wildermuth S, Knoplioch JF, Debatin JF. Human aorta: preliminary results with virtual endoscopy based on three-dimensional MR imaging data sets. Radiology 1996; 199:37–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Debatin JF, Spritzer CE, Grist TM, Beam C, Svetkey LP, Newman GE, Sostman HD. Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography. AJR 1991; 157:981–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dessl A, Giacomuzzi SM, Springer P, Stoeger A, Pototschnig C, Völklein C, Schreder SG, Jaschke W.Virtual endoscopy by post-processing of helical CT data sets. Akt Radiol 1997; 7:216–21Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diederichs CG, Keating DP, Glatting G, Oestman JW Blurring of vessels in spiral CT angiography: effects of colli-mation width, pitch, viewing plane, and windowing in maximum intensity projection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:965–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dillon EH, Camputaro C. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage of the left upper lobe vs duplication of the superior vena cava: distinction based on CT findings. AJR 1993; 160:375–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dillon EH, VanLeeuwwen MS, Fernandez MA, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP. CT angiography: application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Radiology 1993; 189:211–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fishman EK, Heath DG. Three-dimensional Virtual angioscopy’ of spiral CT data for vascular applications in the thorax: is it of value ? Radiology 1997; 205 (P):1573Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freund M, Palmié S, Wesner F, Heller M. Spiral-CT angiography after intra-arterial iliac stent placement. RöFo 1995; 163:310–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schäfer CM, Jandeleit K, Nischelsky JE. Renal artery stenoses: spiral CT angiography. Radiology 1993; 189:185–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamada S, Takamiya M, Kimura K, et al. Type A aortic dissection: evaluation with ultrafast CT. Radiology 1992; 183:155–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hany TF, Schmidt M, Davis CP, Göhde SC, Debatin JF. Diagnostic impact of four postprocessing techniques in evaluating contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR 1998; 170:907–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heath DG, Beauchamp NJ, Fishman EK. Virtual Imaging for Volume Rendered Helical CT Angiography. Radiology 1997; 205 (P):262Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hopper KD, Pierantozzi D, Potok PS, Kasales CJ, TenHave TR, Meilstrup JW, VanSlyke MA, Mahraj R, Westacott S, Hartzel JS. The quality of 3D reconstructions from 1.0 and 1.5 pitch helical and conventional CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:841–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Igel BJ, Durham NC, McDermott VG, Nelson RC. Abdominal aortic aneurysms from the inside out: applications and limitatinos of virtual endoscopy. Radiology 1996; 201 (P): 467Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson CD, Hara AK, Reed JE. Virtual endoscopy: what’s in a name? AJR 1998; 171:1201–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson PT, Heath DG, Kuszyk BS, Fishman EK. CT angiography with interactive volume rendering: advantages and applications in splanchnic vascular imaging. Radiology 1996; 200:564–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson PT, Heath DG, Kuszyk BS, Fishman EK. CT angiography: thoracic vascular imaging with interactive volume rendering technique. J Comput Assist Tomgr 1997;21:110–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jolesz FA, Boston MA, Lorensen WE, Kikinis R, Saiviroonporn P, Phillips MD, Silverman SG. Virtual endoscopy: three-dimensional rendering of cross-sectional images for endoluminal visualization. Radiology 1994; 193 (P):469Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jolesz FA, Lorensen WE, Shinmoto H, Atsumi H, Nakajima S, Kavanaugh P, Saiviroonporn P, Seltzer SE, Silverman SG, Phillips M, Kikinis R. Interactive virtual endoscopy. AJR 1997; 169:1229–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaatee R, Beek FJ, Lange EE, et al. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1997; 205:121–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kay CL, Evangelou HA. A review of the technical and clinical aspects of virtual endoscopy. Endoscopy 1996; 28:768–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kimura F, Shen Y, Date S, Azemoto S, Mochizuchi T. Three-dimensional CT display of the aorta with the use of the new endoscopic mode: clinical utility for thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. Radiology 1994; 193:352Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kimura F, Shen Y, Date S, Azemoto S, Mochizuki T. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection: new endoscopic mode for three-dimensional CT display of aorta. Radiology 1996; 198:573–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Komohara Y, Ogata I, Mitsuzaki K, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, Takahashi M. Clinical value of 3D-CT virtual endoscopy. Radiology 1997; 205 (P):722Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ladd ME, Göhde SC, Steiner P, Pfammatter T, McKinnon GC, Debatin JE Technical note: virtual MR angioscopy of the pulmonary artery tree. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20(5):782–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lawrence JA, Kim D, Kent KC, Stehling MK, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. Lower extremity spiral CT angiography versus catheter angiography. Radiology 1995; 194:903–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Link J, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Brossmann J, Grabener M, Voss C, Heller M. First results of Spiral CT angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. RöFo 1995; 162:204–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Marks MP, Napel S, Jordan JE, Enzmann DR. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography. AJR 1993; 160:1267–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nakanishi T, Yumura A, Fukami K, Ikeda M, Fukuoka H, Ito K. virtual endoscopy of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced ECG triggered electron-beam CT data sets. Radiology 1998; 209 (P):306Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Napel S, Rubin GD, Jeffrey RB. STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:832–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Neri E, Caramella D, Falaschi F, Sbragia P, Laiolo E, Bartolozzi C. Virtual endoscopy of the aorta: role of segmentation artefacts in the visualization of detected findings. Radiology 1997; 205 (P): 623Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neri E, Caramella D, Falaschi F, Sbragia P, Vignali C, Bartolozzi C. Virtual endoscopy of the aorta: segmentation artefacts with perspective surface rendering of spiral CT data sets. Radiology 1997; 205 (P):262Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neri E, Cioni R, Vignalli C, Bisogni C, Petruzzi P, Trincavelli F, Laiolo E, Bartolozzi C. Renal stents follow-up with real-time volume rendering and virtual endoscopy. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:S475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994; 191:155–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, Londy FJ, Wakefield TW, Stanley JC. Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997; 205:128–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Res Imag 1993; 3:877–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Prokop M, Debatin JF. MRI contrast media — new developments and trends. Eur Radiol 1997; 7(Suppl.5):S299–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Prokop M, OhShin H, Schanz A, Schaefer-Prokop CM. Use of maximum intensity projections in CT angiography: a basic review. Radiographics 1997; 17:433–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Remy J, Remy-Jardin M, Artaud D, Fribourg M. Multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstruction techniques in CT: impact on chest diseases. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:335–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Remy J, Remy-Jardin M, Giraud F, Wattinne L. Angioarchitecture of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: clinical utility of three-dimensional helical CT. Radiology 1994; 191:657–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, Deschildre F, Duhamel A. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol. Radiology 1997; 204:157–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Cauvain O, Petyt L, Wannebroucq J, Beregi JP. Diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism with helical CT: role of two-dimensional multiplanar reformations. AJR 1995; 165:1131–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rilinger N, Görich J, Fleiter T, Seifarth H, Sokiranski R, Krämer S, Liewald F, Tomczak R, Brambs HJ. Virtuelle Echtzeit-CT-Angioskopie: Klinische Ergebnisse in verschiedenen Gefäßprovinzen. RöFo 1998; 168–S128Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rodenwaldt J, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Intima Hyperplasia and Endoluminal Stenosis after Iliac Stent Implantation Diagnosed by Computed Tomographic Virtual Intraarterial Endoscopy: Facilities and Limitations of a New Postprocessing Technique. Radiology 1997; 205(P): 513Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rodenwaldt J, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Diagnosis of intima hyperplasia and endoluminal stenosis after iliac stent implantation with CT-virtual intraarterial endoscopy. Radiology 1997, 205 (P): 565Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rodenwaldt J, Kopka L, Lotfi S, Grabbe E. Computed tomographic virtual intraarterial endoscopy after intravascular stent implantation: phantom study and clinical assessment. RöFo 1997; 166,3:180–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Roelandt JR, diMario C, Pandian NG, Wenguang L, Keane D, Slager CJ, deFeyter PJ, Serruys PW Three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images. Rationale, approaches, problems, and directions. Circulation 1994; 90:1044–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rogalla P, Rückert RJ, Gottschalk S, Hamm B. Virtuelle Angioskopie der Aorta nach transfemoraler Stentimplantation bei abdominellem Aortenaneurysma (AAA). RöFo 1998; 168:128Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, Argiro V, Ringl H, Norbash AM, Feller JF, Dake MD, Jeffrey RB, Napel S. Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology 1996; 199:321–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, Jeffrey RB, McDonnell CH, Sommer FG, Wexler L, Williams DM. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994; 190:181–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel SA, et al. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology 1993; 186:147–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rubin GD, Napel SA. Helical CT angiography of renal artery stenosis. AJR 1997; 168:1109–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rubin GD, Napel SA, Beaulieu CF, Dake MD, Jeffrey RB. Virtual angioscopy with volume-rendered CT angiograms: three-dimensional rendering without editing or thresholding. Radiology 1995; 197 (P):144Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rühm SG, Debatin JF. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in the chest, anbdomen and lower extremities. Radiologe 1999,39:100–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schwartz RB, Jones KM, Chernoff DM, et al. Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT — work in progress. Radiology 1992; 185: 513–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Silverman JM, Julien PJ, Herfkens RJ, Pelc NJ. Magnetic Resonance imaging evaluation of pulmonary vascular malformations. Chest 1994; 106:1333–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Soyer P, Heath D, Bluemke DA, Choti MA, Kuhlmann JE, Reichle R, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional helical CT of intrahepatic venous structures: comparison of three rendering techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:122–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Takahashi M, Ashtari M, Papp Z, Patel M, Goldstein J, Maguire WM, Eacobacci T, Khan A, Herman PG. CT angiography of carotid bifurcation: artifacts and pitfalls in shaded-surface display. AJR 1997; 168:813–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Toda J, Ueno E, Sakai F, Suzuki K, Okawa T, Isobe Y. Virtual CT endoscopy of portal vein. Radiology 1997; 205 (P):566Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wielopolski PA, Haacke ME, Adler LP. Three-dimensional MR imaging of the pulmonary vasculature: preliminary experience. Radiology 1992; 183:465–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wildermuth S, Stern CH, Hilfiker PR, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Interactive definition of endoluminal aortic stent size and morphology based on virtual angioscopic rendering of 3D MRA. Radiology 1998; 209 (P):362Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wildermuth S, Stern CH, Pfammatter T, Marincek B, Debatin JE Virtuelles Planungssystem basierend auf 3D MR-Angiographien zur Bestimmung von Größe und Morphologie endoluminaler Aortenstents. RöFo 1999; 170:S232Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zeman RK, Berman PM, et al. Diagnosis of aortic dissection: value of helical CT with multiplanar reformation and three-dimensional rendering. AJR 1995; 164:1375–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. H. Wiese
    • 1
  • P. Rogalla
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Charité, Campus Charité MitteHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations