Advertisement

Simulation of Complex Inviscid and Viscous Vortex Flow

  • J. M. A. Longo
Conference paper
Part of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics book series (IUTAM)

Abstract

A review of recent progress in numerical simulation of vortex-flow aerodynamics at the Institute for Design Aerodynamics of the DLR-Braunschweig is presented. The paper is devoted to the prediction of vortex lift including vortex breakdown, vortex-vortex interaction and shock-vortex interaction. Results are obtained both for compressible and incompressible flow using the DLR Euler/Navier-Stokes CEVCATS-RANS solver. Emphasis is placed on the accuracy limits and ranges of applicability of both Euler and Navier-Stokes calculations for design applications. Computed solutions are correlated with available experimental data for generic but representative geometries of delta wings with and without strake and canard. The results provide an added measure of confidence in the computational solutions of both Euler and Navier-Stokes equations for vortical flows and they also point out some of the limitations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    Hoeljmakers H.W.M. Modelling and Numerical Simulation of Vortex Flow in Aerodynamics. AGARD CP-494, paper No.1 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Newsome R.W. and Kandil O.A. Vortical Flow Aerodynamics -Physical and Numerical SimulationAIAA 87–0206 (1987).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Radespiel, R. A Cell-Vertex Multigrid Method for the Navier-Stokes Equations. NASA TM-101557 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Atkins, H. AMulti-Block Multigrid Method for the Solution of the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations. AIAA 91–0101 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Rossow, C.C.Efficient Computation of inviscid Flow Fields Around Complex Configurations Using a Multi-Block Multigrid Method. Fifth Copper Mountain Conference on Multigrid Methods, Colorado, USA (1991).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Hummel, D. and Srinivasan, P.S. Breakdown Effects on The Low-Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of Slender Delta Wings in Symmetrical Flow. J. Royal Aero. Soc., Vol. 71, pp. 158–168 (1967).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hummel, D.On The Vortex Formation over a Slender Wing at Large Angle of Incidence. AGARD CP-247, papar No. 15 (1978).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Roos, F.W. and Kegelman, J.T.An Experimental Investigation of Sweep-Angle Influence on Delta-Wing Flows. AIAA 90–0383 (1990)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Eisenaar A. and Hoeijmakers H.W.M. An Experimental Study of The Flow over a Sharp-Edge Della Wing at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds. AGARD CP-494, paper No.15 (1990).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hirdes R.H.C.M. Us/European Vortex Flow Experiment Test Report of Wind-Tunnel Measurements on the 65 deg. Wing in the NLR High Speed Wind Tunnel HST. NLR TR-85046 U (1985).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Earnshaw, P.B. and Lawford, J.A.Low-Speed Wind-Tunnel Experiments on a Series of Sharp-Edged Delta Wings. ARC R&M No. 3424 (1964).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Wentz Jr., W.H. and Kohlman, D.L.Vortex Breakdown on Slender Sharp-Edge Wings. J. Aircraft, pp. 156–161 (1971).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Payne, F.M.; Ng, T.T.; Nelson, R.C. and Schiff, L.B.Visualization and Flow Surveys of The Leading Edge Vortex Structure on Delta Wing Planforms. AIAA 86–330 (1986).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Oelker, H.Chr. and Hummel, D.Investigation of The Vorticity Sheets of a Close Coupled Delta Canard Configuration. ICAS 88–3. 11. R1 (1981).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Erickson, G.E. and Schreiner, J.A.Canard-Wing Vortex Interaction at Subsonic Through Supersonic Speeds. AIAA 90–2814 (1990).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Brennenstuhl, U. and Hummel, D.Vortex Formation over Double-Delta Wings. ICAS 82–6. 6. 3 (1982).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Baldwin, B.S. and Lomax, H.Thin Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulent Flows. AIAA 78–257 (1978)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Johnson, D.A. and King, L.S.A Mathematically Simple Turbulence Closure Model for Attached and Separated Turbulent Boundary Layers. AIAA Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 1684–1692 (1985).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Degani, D. and Schiff L.B.Computation of Turbulent Supersonic Flows around Pointed Bodies Having Cross!low Separation. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 66, pp. 173–196 (1986).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Kays, W.M.Heat Transfer to the Transpired Boundary Layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 30, pp. 741–773 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Jameson, A., Schmidt, W. and Turkel, E.Numerical Solutions of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge-Kutta Time Stepping Schemes. AIAA 81–1259 (1981).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Sonar, T.Foundations and Applications of Numerical Grid Generation. Fundamentals and Applications of Numerical Methods for Solution of Euler Equations in Design Aerodynamics. CCGF6.03, Chapter 3 (1989).Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Longo, J.M.A.The Role of the Numerical Dissipation on the Computational Euler Equations Solutions for Vortical Flows. AIAA 89–2232 (1989).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Longo, J.M.A. and Radespiet R.Vortical Flow Simulation by The Solution of The Navier-Stokes Equations. Eigth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, paper 13–4 (1991).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Longo, J.M.A. and Das A.Numerical Simulation of Vortical Flows over Close-Coupled Canard-Wing Configuration. AIAA 90–3003 (1990).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Longo, J.M.A. and Das A.Numerical Computation of Vortical Flow Fields Around Double-Delta Wings Using Navier-Stokes Equations. DGLR Bericht 90–06, pp. 186–189 (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. A. Longo
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für EntwurfsaerodynamikDLR — BraunschweigBraunschweigFed. Rep. Germany

Personalised recommendations