Advertisement

Decomposing Ratings in Service Compositions

  • Icamaan da Silva
  • Andrea Zisman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8274)

Abstract

An important challenge for service-based systems is to be able to select services based on feedback from service consumers and, therefore, to be able to distinguish between good and bad services. However, ratings are normally provided to a service as a whole, without taking into consideration that services are normally formed by a composition of other services. In this paper we propose an approach to support the decomposition of ratings provided to a service composition into ratings to the participating services in a composition. The approach takes into consideration the rating provided for a service composition as a whole, past trust values of the services participating in the composition, and expected and observed QoS aspects of the services. A prototype tool has been implemented to illustrate and evaluate the work. Results of some experimental evaluation of the approach are also reported in the paper.

Keywords

Rating decomposition rating propagation trust values feedback 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Goldberg, K., et al.: Eigentaste: A Constant Time Collaborative Filering Algorithm Information retrieval 4(2) (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Josang, A., Haller, J.: Dirichlet Reputation Systems. In: 2nd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2007), Vienna (April 2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Josang, A., Luo, X., Chen, X.: Continuous Ratings in Discrete Bayesian Reputation Systems. In: Proceedings of the IFPIM (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Y., Ngu, A., Zheng, L.: QoS computation and policing in dynamic web service selection. In: Proc. of World Wide Web Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marden, J.I.: Mathematical Statistics: Old School. University of Illinois (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nepal, S., Malik, Z., Bouguettaya, A.: IEEE Int. Conf. on Web Services ICWS (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruohomaa, S., Kutvonen, L.: Trust management survey. In: Herrmann, P., Issarny, V., Shiu, S.C.K. (eds.) iTrust 2005. LNCS, vol. 3477, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schafer, J.B., Frankowski, D., Herlocker, J., Sen, S.: Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) The Adaptive Web. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 291–324. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    da Silva, I., Zisman, A.: A framework for trusted services. In: Liu, C., Ludwig, H., Toumani, F., Yu, Q. (eds.) ICSOC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7636, pp. 328–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Srivastava, A., Sorenson, P.G.: Service Selection based on customer Rating of Quality of Service Attributes. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, Y., Vassileva, J.: Towards Trust and Reputation Based Web Service Selection: A Survey. International Transaction Systems Science and Applications 3(2) (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Icamaan da Silva
    • 1
  • Andrea Zisman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceCity University LondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Computing DepartmentThe Open UniversityUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations