Trajectory Similarity Measures Using Minimal Paths

  • Brais Cancela
  • Marcos Ortega
  • Alba Fernández
  • Manuel G. Penedo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8156)

Abstract

Dealing with surveillance systems, large amount of distance measures are presented in order to classify both normal and abnormal behavior. Typically, techniques based in point-to-point distances are used. However, these techniques do not take into account information about the environment, like pits or restricted areas, for instance. Using a minimal path algorithm to model the usual paths, we develop new trajectory distance measures that are able to introduce information about the scene. The results obtained show promising results.

Keywords

Potential Image Abnormal Behavior Dynamic Time Warping Minimal Path Trajectory Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    BARD, behavioral analysis and recognition dataset, http://www.varpa.org/bard/
  2. 2.
    Atev, S., Masoud, O., Papanikolopoulos, N.: Learning traffic patterns at intersections by spectral clustering of motion trajectories. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4851–4856. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bashir, F., Khokhar, A., Schonfeld, D.: Object trajectory-based activity classification and recognition using hidden markov models. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16(7), 1912–1919 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biliotti, D., Antonini, G., Thiran, J.P.: Multi-layer hierarchical clustering of pedestrian trajectories for automatic counting of people in video sequences. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Motion and Video Computing (WACV/MOTION 2005), vol. 2, pp. 50–57. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buzan, D., Sclaroff, S., Kollios, G.: Extraction and clustering of motion trajectories in video. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2004, vol. 2, pp. 521–524. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cancela, B., Ortega, M., Penedo, M., Novo, J., Barreira, N.: On the use of a minimal path approach for target trajectory analysis. Pattern Recognition 46(7), 2015–2027 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., Sapiro, G.: Geodesic active contours. International Journal of Computer Vision 22(1), 61–79 (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, Z., Wang, L., Yung, N.H.: Adaptive human motion analysis and prediction. Pattern Recognition 44(12), 2902–2914 (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen, L., Kimmel, R.: Global minimum for active contour models: A minimal path approach. International Journal of Computer Vision 24(1), 57–78 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu, W., Xie, D., Fu, Z., Zeng, W., Maybank, S.: Semantic-based surveillance video retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16(4), 1168–1181 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karypis, G., Han, E.H., Kumar, V.: Chameleon: Hierarchical clustering using dynamic modeling. Computer 32(8), 68–75 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keogh, E., Pazzani, M.: Scaling up dynamic time warping for datamining applications. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 285–289. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kimmel, R., Amir, A., Bruckstein, A.: Finding shortest paths on surfaces using level sets propagation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 17(6), 635–640 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, X., Hu, W., Hu, W.: A coarse-to-fine strategy for vehicle motion trajectory clustering. In: The 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2006, vol. 1, pp. 591–594 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morris, B., Trivedi, M.M.: An adaptive scene description for activity analysis in surveillance video. In: ICPR, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morris, B., Trivedi, M.M.: Learning trajectory patterns by clustering: Experimental studies and comparative evaluation. In: CVPR, pp. 312–319. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Piciarelli, C., Foresti, G.: On-line trajectory clustering for anomalous events detection. Pattern Recognition Letters 27(15), 1835–1842 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sethian, J.: A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93(4), 1591–1595 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, X., Ma, K.T., Ng, G.W., Grimson, W.E.L.: Trajectory analysis and semantic region modeling using nonparametric hierarchical bayesian models. International Journal of Computer Vision 95(3), 287–312 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, X., Ma, X., Grimson, W.E.L.: Unsupervised activity perception in crowded and complicated scenes using hierarchical bayesian models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31(3), 539–555 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brais Cancela
    • 1
  • Marcos Ortega
    • 1
  • Alba Fernández
    • 1
  • Manuel G. Penedo
    • 1
  1. 1.Varpa Group, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of A CoruñaSpain

Personalised recommendations