Advertisement

Evaluation of Quality of Design for Document-Centric Software Services

  • George Feuerlicht
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7759)

Abstract

As the size and complexity of service oriented applications increases ensuring the quality of design of services that constitute these applications is becoming critical. Poor design of services results in unnecessarily complex and inflexible applications that are difficult to maintain and evolve. Service design has been the subject of intense research interest for almost a decade and there is a wide agreement about the key service design principles that promote maintainability of software services. Recent research efforts include attempts to develop reliable metrics for assessing design quality of service-oriented applications. Most of these metrics were adapted from metrics for object-oriented software and focus on measuring intra-service cohesion and inter-service coupling. In this paper we argue that such metrics are of limited use in assessing the quality of coarse-grained document-centric services used in majority of SOA applications and propose a Message Data Coupling Index (MDCI) - a metric that evaluates orthogonality of a family of XML schemas based on the level of data coupling. We describe the implementation of a prototype tool that computes several variants of the MDCI metric.

Keywords

service design metrics XML schema evolution data coupling 

References

  1. 1.
    Basci, D., Misra, S.: Measuring and evaluating a design complexity metric for XML schema documents. Journal of Information Science and Engineering 25(5), 1405–1425 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bansiya, J., Davis, C.G.: A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(1), 4–17 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Etzkorn, L.H., et al.: A comparison of cohesion metrics for object-oriented systems. Information and Software Technology 46(10), 677–687 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eder, J., Kappel, G., Schrefl, M.: Coupling and cohesion in object-oriented systems. Technical Report, University of Klagenfurt, Austria (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sindhgatta, R., Sengupta, B., Ponnalagu, K.: Measuring the Quality of Service Oriented Design. In: Baresi, L., Chi, C.-H., Suzuki, J. (eds.) ICSOC-ServiceWave 2009. LNCS, vol. 5900, pp. 485–499. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    OTA. OTA Specifications (May 6, 2010), http://www.opentravel.org/Specifications/Default.aspx
  7. 7.
    Necaský, M.: Conceptual Modeling for XML. Dissertations in Database and Information Systems Series. IOS Press/AKA Verlag (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glushko, R., McGrath, T.: Document engineering: analyzing and designing documents for business informatics and Web services. MIT Press Books (January 2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glushko, R., McGrath, T.: Patterns and reuse in document engineering. In: XML 2002 Proceedings (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glushko, R.J., McGrath, T.: Document Engineering for e-Business. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (DocEng 2002), McLean, Virginia, USA. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ebXML. ebXML - Enabling A Global Electronic Market (December 9, 2007), http://www.ebxml.org/
  12. 12.
    Feuerlicht, G., Lozina, J.: Understanding Service Reusability. In: 15th International Conference Systems Integration 2007, Prague, Czech Republic. VSE Prague (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perepletchikov, M., Ryan, C., Frampton, K.: Cohesion metrics for predicting maintainability of service-oriented software, pp. 328–335. qsic (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papazoglou, M.P., Yang, J.: Design Methodology for Web Services and Business Processes. In: Buchmann, A.P., Casati, F., Fiege, L., Hsu, M.-C., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) TES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2444, pp. 54–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Papazoglou, M.P., Heuvel, W.V.D.: Service-oriented design and development methodology. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology 2(4), 412–442 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vinoski, S.: Old measures for new services. IEEE Internet Computing 9(6), 72–74 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pautasso, C., Zimmermann, O., Leymann, F.: Restful web services vs. big’web services: making the right architectural decision. In: 17th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, Beijing (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pautasso, C., Wilde, E.: Why is the web loosely coupled?: a multi-faceted metric for service design. In: 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, Madrid (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stevens, W.P., Myers, G.J., Constantine, L.L.: Structured Design. IBM Systems Journal 38(2 & 3) (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., Lorensen, W.: Object-oriented modeling and design 1991. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chidamber, S., Kemerer, C.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20(6), 476–493 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McDowell, A., Schmidt, C., Yue, K.B.: Analysis and metrics of XML schema (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Visser, J.: Structure metrics for XML Schema. In: Proceedings of XATA (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Necaský, M., Mlýnková, I.: A Framework for Efficient Design, Maintaining, and Evolution of a System of XML Applications. In: Proceedings of the Databases, Texts, Specifications and Objects, DATESO, vol. 10, pp. 38–49Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Necaský, M., Mlýnková, I.: Five-Level Multi-Application Schema Evolution. In: Proceedings of the Databases, Texts, Specifications and Objects, DATESO, vol. 9, pp. 213–217Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Feuerlicht, G.: Simple Metric for Assessing Quality of Service Design. In: Maximilien, E.M., Rossi, G., Yuan, S.-T., Ludwig, H., Fantinato, M. (eds.) ICSOC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6568, pp. 133–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Page-Jones, M.: The Practical Guide to Structured Systems Design, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1988)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feuerlicht, G.: Design of Service Interfaces for e-Business Applications using Data Normalization Techniques. Journal of Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1–14 (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Feuerlicht, G.: System Development Life-Cycle Support for Service-Oriented Applications. In: 5th International Conference on Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, SoMet 2006, Quebec, Canada. IOS Press, The Netherlands (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schmelzer: Solving the service granularity challenge (December 13, 2007), http://searchsoa.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid26_gci1172330,00.html
  31. 31.
    Alliance, O.T.: OpenTravelTM Alliance XML Schema Design Best Practices (September 1, 2010), http://www.opentravel.org/Resources/Uploads/PDF/OTA_SchemaDesignBestPracticesV3.06.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Feuerlicht
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyUniversity of Economics, PraguePragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering and Information TechnologyUniversity of Technology, SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations