Precise Estimation of Painting Surfaces for Digital Archiving

  • Tetsushi Tanimoto
  • Takahiko Horiuchi
  • Shoji Tominaga
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7786)

Abstract

This paper proposes a method for precisely estimating the surface properties of oil paintings for digital archiving. The surface properties include surface height information, surface spectral reflectance, and reflection model parameters. We use mainly a multiband imaging system and a high-resolution RGB camera, and use locally a spectrometer and a laser-scanning meter for precise surface measurement. First, we combine the estimated surface-spectral reflectances in high resolution from the multiband system and the measurements in low resolution from the spectrometer. Second, we combine the estimated surface height in high resolution from the RGB camera and the measurements in low resolution from a laser-scanning meter. Third, we develop a region dependent rendering algorithm where appropriate reflection parameters are determined for classified regions. All estimates of the surface properties are combined for rendering realistic color images of oil paintings. The feasibility of the proposed methods is shown in experiments using real oil paintings.

Keywords

Color image rendering precise color reproduction oil painting surface property estimation digital archiving 

References

  1. 1.
    Martinez, K., Cupitt, J., Saunders, D., Pillay, R.: Ten years of art painting research. Proc. of the IEEE 90(1), 28–41 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tominga, S., Tanaka, N., Komada, T.: Imaging and rendering of oil paintings using multi-band camera. In: Proc. IEEE Southwest Symp. Image Anal. & Interpret, pp. 6–10 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tominaga, S., Tanaka, N.: Spectral image acquisition, analysis, and rendering for art paintings. J. Electronic Imaging 17(4), 043022.1–043022.13 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tominaga, S., Nishi, S.: Surface reflection properties of oil paints under various conditions. In: Proc. SPIE EI, vol. 6807, pp. 0M1–0M8 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kay, S.: Fundamentals of statistical signal processing. Estimation Theory 12 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forgy, E.: Cluster analysis of multivariate data: efficiency versus interpretability of classifications. Biometrics 21, 768–780 (1965)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proc. 5th Berkeley Syp. on Math. Stat. and Prob. 1, pp. 281–297. Univ. of California Press, Berkerley (1967)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Woodham, R.: Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images. Optical Engineering 19(1), 139–144 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frankot, R., Chellappa, R.: A method for enforcing integrability in shape from shading algorithms. IEEE Trans. on PAMI 10(4), 439–451 (1988)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ando, S.: Consistent gradient operator. IEEE Trans. on PAMI 22(3), 252–265 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tominaga, S., Ujike, H., Horiuchi, T.: Surface reconstruction of oil paintings for digital archiving. In: Proc. IEEE southwest Symp. Image Anal. & Interpret, pp. 173–176 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tetsushi Tanimoto
    • 1
  • Takahiko Horiuchi
    • 1
  • Shoji Tominaga
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Advanced Integration ScienceChiba UniversityChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations