Identification of Illustrators

  • Fadime Sener
  • Nermin Samet
  • Pinar Duygulu Sahin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7583)


This paper is motivated by a book in which artists and illustrators from all over the world offer their personal interpretations of the declaration of human rights in pictures [1]. It was enthusiastic for a young reader to see an illustration of an artist that he already knows from his books . The characters were different, the topic was irrelevant, but still it was easy to identify the illustrators based on the style of the illustration. Inspired by the human’s ability to identify illustrators, in this study we propose a method that can automatically learn to distinguish illustrations of different illustrators using computer vision techniques.


Color Histogram Sift Feature Computer Vision Technique Artistic Style Dense Sift 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    We Are All Born Free: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Pictures. Frances Lincoln (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stork, D.: Computer image analysis of paintings and drawings: an introduction to the literature. In: The 1st International Workshop on Image Processing for Artist Identification, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sablatnig, R., Kammerer, P., Zolda, E.: Hierarchical classification of paintings using face- and brush stroke models. In: 14th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 172–174 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kroner, S., Lattner, A.: Authentication of free hand drawings by pattern recognition methods. In: 14th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 462–464 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keren, D.: Painter identification using local features and naive bayes. In: 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 474–477 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Icoglu, O., Gunsel, B., Sariel, S.: Classification and indexing of paintings based on art movements. In: Proceedings of European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Vienna, Austria, pp. 749–752 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lombardi, T.: The Classification of Style in Painting: Computational Approaches to Artistic Style. VDM Verlag (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Legrand, A., Vurpillot, V., Tremeau, A., Schettini, R.: Automatic color patch selection for painting identification. In: 4th European Conference on Colour in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision (CGIV), pp. 300–303 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zujovic, J., Gandy, L., Friedman, S., Pardo, B., Pappas, T.N.: Classifying paintings by artistic genre: An analysis of features and classifiers. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Antaresti, T., Arymurthy, A.M.: Image feature extraction and recognition of abstractionism and realism style of indonesian paintings. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Second International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies (ACT 2010), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 149–152 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blessing, A., Wen, K.: Using machine learning for identification of art paintings. Technical report, Stanford University (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, C.R., Hendriks, J.E., Berezhnoy, I.J., Brevdo, E., Hughes, S., Daubechies, I., Li, J., Postma, E., Wang, J.Z.: Image processing for artist identification. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37–48 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cabral, R., Costeira, J.P., la Torre, F.D., Bernardino, A., Carneiro, G.: Time and order estimation of paintings based on visual features and expert priors. In: Proc. of the Conference on Computer Vision and Analysis of Images of Art II, San Francisco, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    da Silva, N.P., Marques, M., Carneiro, G., Costeira, J.P.: Explaining scene composition using kinematic chains of humans: application to portuguese tiles history. In: Proc. of the Conference on Computer Vision and Analysis of Images of Art II, San Francisco, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roman-Rangel, E., Pallan, C., Odobez, J.M., Gatica-Perez, D.: Analyzing ancient maya glyph collections with contextual shape descriptors. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, Special Issue on e-Heritage 94, 101–117 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision 42, 145–175 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: Schmid, C., Soatto, S., Tomasi, C. (eds.) International Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, INRIA Rhône-Alpes, ZIRST-655, av. de l’Europe, Montbonnot-38334, pp. 886–893 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 60, 91–110 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sivic, J., Russell, B.C., Efros, A.A., Zisserman, A., Freeman, W.T.: Discovering object categories in image collections. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2, 27:1–27:27 (2011), Software available at

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fadime Sener
    • 1
  • Nermin Samet
    • 1
  • Pinar Duygulu Sahin
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Engineering DepartmentBilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations