An Approach to Identify a Linked Spatial Network for Large Mammal Conservation on Yellow Sea Coast

  • S. B. FangEmail author
  • Z. Tian
  • Y. G. Sun
  • C. S. YinEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Geology book series (SPRINGERGEOL)


On the coastal region how to protect the natural ecosystems is an urgent issue. In this study, taking the Elaphurus Davidianus as a case, a framework has been proposed to identify an ecological spatial network for the conservation of large mammals, which could be finished in two steps: ecological naturalness assessments and human-induced ecological risks assessments. Through the naturalness assessments regions to be conserved is identified, which are regions that having high ecological value; and through the human-induced risks assessments, a spatial network that is linked by regions with low human induced ecological impacts is identified. The analysis shows that this approach is an efficient solution through which the ecological risks can be infiltrated and ranked, and the efficient ecological conservation could be realized by prioritizing the management efforts.


Ecological security Ecosystem management Ecological naturalness assessment Ecological risks assessment Coastal region 


  1. Ding, Y. (2005). Milu research in China. Changchun, Jilin: Jilin Science and Technology Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  2. Miller, S., & Wardrop, D. (2006). Adapting the floristic quality assessment index to indicate anthropogenic disturbance in central Pennsylvania wetlands. Ecological Indicators, 6, 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Myers, N. (1990). The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spots analysis. The Environmentalist, 10, 243–256.Google Scholar
  4. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R., Mittermeier, C., Gustavo, AB., da Fonseca, GA., Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.Google Scholar
  5. Noss, R. (1987). From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the nature conservancy (U.S.A). Biological Conservation, 41, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Patil, G., Brooks, R., Myers, W., et al. (2001). Ecosystem health and its measurement at landscape scale: toward the next generation of quantitative assessments. Ecosystem Health, 7, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Peterson, G., Cumming, G., & Carpenter, S. (2003). Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology, 17, 358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Fisheries and Life ScienceShanghai Ocean UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.National Marine Environmental Monitoring CenterDalianChina
  3. 3.Environmental Science and Engineering DepartmentFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations