Advertisement

The Perception of Citizenship in Korea: Its Social and Political Variations

  • Jonghoe YangEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context book series (TRANSCULT, volume 5)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate how Koreans perceive citizenship and how their perceptions vary by some of their social and political characteristics. Analyses of 2004 KGSS data reveal that the citizenship, for the Koreans, consists of five components, that is, loyalty to the state, loyalty to the community, citizenship rights, political efficacy and political knowledge. But the concept is not uniform and bounded. People with different backgrounds conceptualize citizenship differently based on diverse grounds such as sex, age, political orientation, religion, and region of residence. Thus citizenship perceived by Koreans cannot be neatly characterized to be either the republican or the liberal, either the left or the right. Rather there are a variety of mixed forms, which reflect Korea’s turbulent history of democratic development and recent changes including the neo-liberal reform after the 1997 economic crisis and the accelerated pace of globalization. Finally, a concept of culture-specific, but liberal, citizenship is proposed as a viable alternative in this conflicting situation.

Keywords

Political Orientation National Identity Civil Disobedience Political Knowledge Civic Virtue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chang, Y.-S. (1998). “The progressive Christian church and democracy in South Korea”. Journal of Church and State, 40(2), 437–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chastenay, M.-H., Pagé, M., Phalet, K., Swyngedouw, M., & Jean-Claude Lasry, J.-C. (2004). “Identity, equality and participation: Testing the dimensions of citizenship in Canada and Belgium”. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 36(3), 84–112.Google Scholar
  3. Choe, H. (2003). “Taehanmin’guk kwa chunghwainmin’gonghwaguk ŭi kungmin chŏngch’esŏng kwa simin’gwŏn chedo” (National identity and citizenship in the PRC and the ROK) Han’guksahoehak (Korean Journal of Sociology), 37(4), 143–173.Google Scholar
  4. Choe, H. (2005). “Han’il sit’ichŭnship pigyo: simin’ŭisik ŭi kongjŏk yŏngyŏk chihyang kwa nŭngdongsŏng ŭl chungsim ŭiro” (Comparison of citizenship between Korean and Japan: Focusing on citizens’ public space orientation and positivity). Paper Presented at Che ihoe Han’guk chonghap sahoejosa simposium (the 2nd KGSS Symposium on Koreans’ Economic and Civil Consciousness and Social Networks: International Comparison). May 19, 2005. Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  5. Choe, H. (2006). “Han’guk sit’ichŭnship: 1987nyŏn ihu simin’gwŏn chedo ŭi pyŏnhwa wa siminŭisik” (South Korean citizenship: The institutional changes since 1987 and their effects on citizens’ consciousness). Minjujuŭi wa in’gwŏn (Democracy and Human Rights), 6(1), 171–205.Google Scholar
  6. Choe, H. (2007). “Han’gukin ŭi damunhwa sit’ichŭnship: damunhwa ŭisik ŭl chungsim ŭiro” (National identity and multicultural citizenship in South Korea). Siminsahoe wa NGO (Civil Society and NGO), 5(2), 147–227.Google Scholar
  7. Conover, P. J., Crewe, I. M., & Searling, D. D. (1991). “The nature of citizenship in the United States and Great Britain: Empirical comments on theoretical themes”. Journal of Politics, 53(3), 800–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung, K. (2004). “Han’gugin ŭi kukka chŏngch’esŏng kugje pigyo” (International comparison of Koreans’ national identity: Focusing on evaluation of membership requirements). Paper Presented at Che ilhoe Hanguk chonghapsahoejosa symposium (the 1st KGSS Symposium on Koreans’ value Orientations: International Comparison). June 2, 2004. Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  9. Dalton, R. J. (2008). “Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation”. Political Studies, 56, 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falk, R. (2000). “The decline of citizenship in an era of globalization”. Citizenship Studies, 4(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glenn, E. (2000). “Citizenship and inequality: historical and global perspectives”. Social Problems, 47(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heater, D. (1990). Citizenship: The civic ideal in world history, politics and education. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  13. Hong, D.-S. (1983). “Chigŏp punsŏk ŭl t’onghan kyech’ŭng yŏngu: Hanguk p’yojun chigŏp punryu rŭl chungsim ŭro” (A study of stratification through the analysis of occupations: focusing on Korean Standard Occupational Classification. (In Korean) Sahoe kwahak kwa chŏngch’aek yŏngu (Social Science and Policy Studies), 5(3), 69–87.Google Scholar
  14. Isin, E. F. & Turner, B. S. (2007). “Investigating citizenship: An agenda for citizenship studies”. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeon, J. (2000). Park Chung Hee, the reactionary modernist. (In Korean) Seoul: Chaeksesang.Google Scholar
  16. Kang, I.-C. (2007). “Pak chŏng-hi chŏnggwŏn kwa kaesin’gyo kyohoe” (Park Chung-Hee regime and the Protestant Church). Chonggyo wa munhwa yŏn’gu (Studies in Religious Culture), 9, 83–118.Google Scholar
  17. Kim, S. (2007). “Liberal nationalism and responsible citizenship in South Korea”. Citizenship Studies, 11(5), 449–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Korean Sociological Association. (1989). Regionalism and regional conflicts in Korea. (In Korean) Seoul: Seongwon-SaGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, C. (2008). “Nation-state v. nation-state: The transformation of citizenship and the state-nation nexus in South Korea”. Paper presented at the Symposium on Globalization of South Korea: Its Impact and Opportunities. Dec. 17–18, Seoul Korea.Google Scholar
  20. Lister, R., Smith, N., Middleton, S., & Cox, L. (2003). “Young people talk about citizenship: Empirical perspectives on theoretical and political debates”. Citizenship Studies, 7(2), 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lonnie, R. S., & Bogard, K. L. (2008). “Citizenship attitudes and allegiances in diverse youth”. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(4), 286–296.Google Scholar
  22. Marshall, T. H. (1973). Class, citizenship and social development. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  23. Miller-Idriss, C. (2006). “Everyday understanding of citizenship in Germany”. Citizenship Studies, 10(5), 541–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Na, E. Y. (2005). “Chiyŏk pulgyunhyŏng kwa chiyŏk kaldŭng” (Regional gaps and regional conflict). In Hyunho Seok et al. Hanguksahoe ŭi pulpyŏngdŭng kwa kongjŏngsŏng (Changes in perspectives on inequality and justice in Korean society). (pp. 263–288). Seoul: Sungkyunkwan University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Oliver, D., & Heater, D. (1994). The Foundations of Citizenship. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  26. Porter, A. E. (1993). “Impoverished concepts of citizenship in the debate on the National Curriculum”. In J. Gundara and A. Porter (Ed.). Diversity, citizenship and the National Curriculum Debate. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  27. Seligman, A. B. (1992). The Idea of Civil Society. New York: Ontario Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  28. Theiss-Morse, E. (1993). “Conceptualization of good citizenship and political participation”. Political behavior, 15(4), 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vandenberg, A. 2000. “Contesting Citizenship and Democracy in a Global Era”. In Andrew Vandenberg (Ed.). Citizenship and Democracy in a Global Era, (pp. 3–17). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Wong, C. K., & Wong, K. Y. (2004). “Universal Ideals and Particular Constraints of Social Citizenship: The Chinese Experience of Unifying Rights and responsibilities”. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang, Jonghoe. “Globalization and Value Change in Korea: With a Special Emphasis on the Impact of the Recent Economic Crisis and Neoliberali Reform on the Confucian Value System”. Korean Social Science Journal, XXX(2), 1–23.Google Scholar
  32. Yang, Jonghoe., & Hyun-Chin, Lim. (2007). “Asian Values in Capitalist Development Revisited”, In Kyong-Dong Kim and Hyun-Chin Lim (Eds.), East Meets West: Civilizational Encounters and the Spirit of Capitalism in East Asia, Leiden, Neth: Brill, pp.121–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologySungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.SeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations