Towards Business-Oriented Monitoring and Adaptation of Distributed Service-Based Applications from a Process Owner’s Viewpoint

  • Krešimir Vidačković
  • Nico Weiner
  • Holger Kett
  • Thomas Renner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6275)


Dynamically changing economic environments require distributed Service-Based Applications (SBAs) to be highly flexible and reactive, so that the utilization of monitoring and adaptation functionalities becomes imperative. While approaches for monitoring functional and non-functional properties from the operational environment have gained a certain degree of maturity, there is still a lack of reflecting business-related aspects. This paper introduces the vision of a generic monitoring and adaptation framework focusing on the interactions between different abstraction layers of distributed SBAs. Starting from the business model perspective, strategic decisions are specified by the business model design in order to constitute the scope for possible operational adaptations at the business process, service and resource layers. Additionally, the monitoring of technical and business-related aspects affects not only the operational layers, but also the business model layer in the long-term.


Service-Based Applications Cross-Layer Monitoring Business Model Design 


  1. 1.
    Baresi, L., Guinea, S.: Towards Dynamic Monitoring of WS-BPEL Processes. In: Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Traverso, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3826, pp. 269–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pistore, M., Traverso, P.: Assumption-Based Composition and Monitoring of Web Services. In: Baresi, L., Nitto, E.D. (eds.) Test and Analysis of Web Services, pp. 307–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spanoudakis, G., Mahbub, K.: Non-Intrusive Monitoring of Service Based Systems. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 15(3), 325–358 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Momm, C., Gebhart, M., Abeck, S.: A Model-Driven Approach for Monitoring Business Performance in Web Service Compositions. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (ICIW), pp. 343–350. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colombo, M., Nitto, E.D., Mauri, M.: SCENE: A Service Composition Execution Environment Supporting Dynamic Changes Disciplined Through Rules. In: Dan, A., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4294, pp. 191–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ardagna, D., Comuzzi, M., Mussi, E., Pernici, B., Plebani, P.: PAWS: A Framework for Executing Adaptive Web-Service Processes. IEEE Software 24(6), 39–46 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gehlert, A., Heuer, A.: Towards Goal-Driven Self Optimisation of Service Based Applications. In: Mähönen, P., Pohl, K., Priol, T. (eds.) ServiceWave 2008. LNCS, vol. 5377, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baresi, L., Guinea, S., Kazhamiakin, R., Pistore, M.: An Integrated Approach for the Run-Time Monitoring of BPEL Orchestrations. In: Mähönen, P., Pohl, K., Priol, T. (eds.) ServiceWave 2008. LNCS, vol. 5377, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eriksson, H.-E., Penker, M.: Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouwman, H., De Vos, H., Haaker, T.: Mobile service innovation and business models. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kett, H., Scheithauer, G., Weiner, N., Weisbecker, A.: Integrated Service Engineering (ISE) for Service-Ecosystems: An Interdisciplinary Methodology for the Internet of Services. In: Cunningham, P., Cunningham, M. (eds.) eChallenges e-2009 Conference Proceedings, IIMC International Information Management Corporation Ltd., Dublin (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Osterwalder, A.: The Business Model Ontology: a proposition in a design science approach. PhD thesis, Université de Lausanne (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Tucci, C.L.: Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept. In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 16, pp. 1–25 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Samavi, R., Yu, E., Topaloglou, T.: Strategic Reasoning about business models: a conceptual modeling approach. Information Systems and E-Business Management 7(2), 171–198 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weiner, N., Renner, T., Neuhart, A., Kett, H.: Success Factors for Innovative Internet Business Models - Venture Capital Insights. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gordijn, J.: E-business value modelling using the e3-value ontology. In: Currie, W. (ed.) Value creation from e-business models, pp. 98–127. Elsevier, Oxford (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scheithauer, G., Winkler, M.: A Service Description Framework for Service Ecosystems. In: Bamberger Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsinformatik und Angewandten Informatik Nr. 78., Bamberg University (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cardoso, J., Winkler, M., Voigt, K.: A Service Description Language for the Internet of Services. In: Alt, R., Fähnrich, K.-P., Franczyk, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Services Science ISSS 2009, pp. 229–240. Logos, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vidackovic, K., Kett, H., Renner, T.: Service Chain Monitoring for the Internet of Services. In: Cunningham, P., Cunningham, M. (eds.) eChallenges e-2009 Conference Proceedings. IIMC International Information Management Corporation Ltd., Dublin (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krešimir Vidačković
    • 1
  • Nico Weiner
    • 1
  • Holger Kett
    • 1
  • Thomas Renner
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer IAO, Competence Center Electronic BusinessStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations