Towards a Unified Architecture for Resilience, Survivability and Autonomic Fault-Management for Self-managing Networks

  • Nikolay Tcholtchev
  • Monika Grajzer
  • Bruno Vidalenc
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6275)


The emergence of self-managing networks can be seen as an enabler for increased dependability, reliability and robustness of the network layer. All these features are significant for the services and applications relying on the network infrastructure. This paper explores the links between traditional Fault-Management functions belonging to the management plane and the fundamental network functions for Resilience and Survivability embedded inside the protocol modules of a node/device. This results in an architectural framework that allows nodes/devices to implement the converging aspects of Fault-Management (now becoming autonomic), Resilience and Survivability in a self-managing network. The components and adaptation mechanisms of the proposed framework will make the network layer more robust and application/service aware. Thus, the dependability, reliability, and adaptability of the upper layer services and applications are expected to increase.


Resilience Survivability Autonomic Fault-Management Risk Assessment GANA self-managing networks 


  1. 1.
    Chaparadza, R.: Fraunhofer FOKUS Institute for Open Communication Systems Berlin, Germany: Requirements for a Generic Autonomic Network Architecture (GANA), suitable for Standardizable Autonomic Behavior Specifications for Diverse Networking Environments, Published by the International Engineering Consortium (IEC). Annual Review of Communications 61 (December 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Green, C.J.: Protocols for a self-healing network. In: IEEE Conference Record, Military Communications Conference, MILCOM 1995, November 6, vol. 1, pp. 252–256 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Larrabeiti, D., et al.: Multi-Domain Issues of Resilience. In: The proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, July 3-7 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rai, S., Mukherjee, B., Deshpande, O.: IP resilience within an autonomous system: current approaches, challenges, and future directions. IEEE Communications Magazine 43(10), 142–149 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suwala, G., Swallow, G.: SONET/SDH-like resilience for IP networks: a survey of traffic protection mechanisms. IEEE Network 18(2), 20–25 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Touvet, F., Harle, D.: Network Resilience in Multilayer Networks: A Critical Review and Open Issues. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Networking-Part 1, July 09-13, pp. 829–838 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaparadza, R.: UniFAFF: A Unified Framework for Implementing Autonomic Fault-Management and Failure-Detection for Self-Managing Networks. International Journal of Network Management (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baliosian, J., Sailhan, F., Devitt, A., Bosneag, A.-M.: The Omega Architecture: Towards Adaptable, Self-Managed Networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st Annual Workshop on Distributed Autonomous Network Management Systems, Dublin, Ireland (June 2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolay Tcholtchev
    • 1
  • Monika Grajzer
    • 2
  • Bruno Vidalenc
    • 3
  1. 1.Fraunhofer FOKUS Institute for Open Communication SystemsBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Telcordia PolandPoznanPoland
  3. 3.Alcatel-Lucent FranceParisFrance

Personalised recommendations