Advertisement

Ambrosio-Tortorelli Segmentation of Stochastic Images

  • Torben Pätz
  • Tobias Preusser
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6315)

Abstract

We present an extension of the classical Ambrosio-Tortorelli approximation of the Mumford-Shah approach for the segmentation of images with uncertain gray values resulting from measurement errors and noise. Our approach yields a reliable precision estimate for the segmentation result, and it allows to quantify the robustness of edges in noisy images and under gray value uncertainty. We develop an ansatz space for such images by identifying gray values with random variables. The use of these stochastic images in the minimization of energies of Ambrosio-Tortorelli type leads to stochastic partial differential equations for the stochastic smoothed image and a stochastic phase field for the edge set. For their discretization we utilize the generalized polynomial chaos expansion and the generalized spectral decomposition (GSD) method. We demonstrate the performance of the method on artificial data as well as real medical ultrasound data.

Keywords

Polynomial Chaos Polynomial Chaos Expansion Stochastic Collocation Street Scene Stochastic Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

978-3-642-15555-0_19_MOESM1_ESM.mov (308 kb)
Electronic Supplementary Material (2,847 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Ambrosio, L., Tortorelli, M.: Approximation of functional depending on jumps by elliptic functional via gamma-convergence. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 43(8), 999–1036 (1990)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruhn, A., Weickert, J., Schnörr, C.: Lucas/Kanade meets Horn/Schunck: Combining local and global optic flow methods. Int. J. of Computer Vision 61(3), 211–231 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cameron, R.H., Martin, W.T.: The orthogonal development of non-linear functionals in series of Fourier-Hermite functionals. The Annals of Mathematics 48(2), 385–392 (1947)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., Sapiro, G.: Geodesic active contours. Int. J. of Computer Vision 22(1), 61–79 (1997)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan, T., Vese, L.: Active contours without edges. IEEE T. Image. Process. 10(2), 266–277 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Debusschere, B.J., Najm, H.N., Pébay, P.P., Knio, O.M., Ghanem, R.G., Le Maître, O.P.: Numerical challenges in the use of polynomial chaos representations for stochastic processes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26(2), 698–719 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erdem, E., Sancar Yilmaz, A., Tari, S.: Mumford-Shah regularizer with spatial coherence. In: Sgallari, F., Murli, A., Paragios, N. (eds.) SSVM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4485, pp. 545–555. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghanem, R.G., Spanos, P.D.: Stochastic finite elements: A spectral approach. Springer-Verlag, New York (1991)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loeve, M.: Probability theory, 4th edn. Springer, New York (1977)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malladi, R., Sethian, J.A., Vemuri, B.C.: Evolutionary fronts for topology-independent shape modeling and recovery. In: Eklundh, J.-O. (ed.) ECCV 1994, Part I. LNCS, vol. 801, pp. 3–13. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCane, B., Novins, K., Crannitch, D., Galvin, B.: On benchmarking optical flow. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 84(1), 126–143 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mumford, D., Shah, J.: Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 42(5), 577–685 (1989)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nestares, O., Fleet, D.J., Heeger, D.J.: Likelihood functions and confidence bounds for total-least-squares problems. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 523–530 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nouy, A.: A generalized spectral decomposition technique to solve a class of linear stochastic partial differential equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 196(45-48), 4521–4537 (2007)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Preusser, T., Scharr, H., Krajsek, K., Kirby, R.: Building blocks for computer vision with stochastic partial differential equations. Int. J. of Computer Vision 80(3), 375–405 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stefanou, G., Nouy, A., Clement, A.: Identification of random shapes from images through polynomial chaos expansion of random level-set functions. Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Engineering 79(2), 127–155 (2009)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weber, J., Malik, J.: Robust computation of optical flow in a multi-scale differential framework. Int. J. of Computer Vision 14(1), 67–81 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wiener, N.: The homogeneous chaos. Am. J. of Mathematics 60(4), 897–936 (1938)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xiu, D., Hesthaven, J.S.: High-order collocation methods for differential equations with random inputs. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 27(3), 1118–1139 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xiu, D., Karniadakis, G.E.: The Wiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24(2), 619–644 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torben Pätz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tobias Preusser
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Engineering and ScienceUniversity BremenJacobs
  2. 2.Fraunhofer MEVISBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations