A Power Benchmarking Framework for Network Devices

  • Priya Mahadevan
  • Puneet Sharma
  • Sujata Banerjee
  • Parthasarathy Ranganathan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5550)


Energy efficiency is becoming increasingly important in the operation of networking infrastructure, especially in enterprise and data center networks. Researchers have proposed several strategies for energy management of networking devices. However, we need a comprehensive characterization of power consumption by a variety of switches and routers to accurately quantify the savings from the various power savings schemes. In this paper, we first describe the hurdles in network power instrumentation and present a power measurement study of a variety of networking gear such as hubs, edge switches, core switches, routers and wireless access points in both stand-alone mode and a production data center. We build and describe a benchmarking suite that will allow users to measure and compare the power consumed for a large set of common configurations at any switch or router of their choice. We also propose a network energy proportionality index, which is an easily measurable metric, to compare power consumption behaviors of multiple devices.


Network energy management Benchmarking 


  1. 1.
    Gupta, M., Singh, S.: Greening of the Internet. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (August 2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gupta, M., Grover, S., Singh, S.: A feasibility study for power management in LAN switches. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICNP (October 2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta, M., Singh, S.: Energy conservation with low power modes in Ethernet LAN environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (MiniSymposium) (May 2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nedevschi, S., Popa, L., Iannaccone, G., Ratnasamy, S., Wetherall, D.: Reducing Network Energy Consumption via Rate-Adaptation and Sleeping. In: Proceedings of NSDI (April 2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barroso, L.A., Holzle, U.: The case for energy-proportional computing. In: IEEE Computer (December 2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mayo, R., Ranganathan, P.: Energy Consumption in Mobile Devices: Why Future Systems Need Requirements-Aware Energy Scale-Down. In: Falsafi, B., VijayKumar, T.N. (eds.) PACS 2003. LNCS, vol. 3164, pp. 26–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rivoire, S., Shah, M., Ranganathan, P., Kozyrakis, C., Meza, J.: Modeling and Metrology Challenges for Enterprise Power Management. IEEE Computer (December 2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Fares, M., Loukissas, A., Vahdat, A.: A Scalable, Commodity Data Center Architecture. In: Proceedings of SIGCOMM (August 2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Chabarek, J., Sommers, J., Barford, P., Estan, C., Tsiang, D., Wright, S.: Power awareness in network design and routing. In: Proceedings of INFOCOM (April 2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gunaratne, C., Christensen, K., Nordman, B., Suen, S.: Reducing the Energy Consumption of Ethernet with Adaptive Link Rate (ALR). IEEE Transactions on Computers 57, 448–461 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Allman, M., Christensen, K., Nordman, B., Paxson, V.: Enabling an Energy-Efficient Future Internet Through Selectively Connected End Systems. In: Proceedings of HotNets (November 2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priya Mahadevan
    • 1
  • Puneet Sharma
    • 1
  • Sujata Banerjee
    • 1
  • Parthasarathy Ranganathan
    • 1
  1. 1.HP LabsPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations