Advertisement

Experimental Results on Bilateral Control Using an Industrial Telemanipulator

  • Manuel Ferre
  • Jordi Barrio
  • Claudio Melchiorri
  • Juan M. Bogado
  • Pedro L. Castedo
  • Juan M. Ibarra
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 31)

Summary

The goal of this chapter is to experimentally study the behaviour of bilateral controllers. Previous chapter introduced a general framework for designing bilateral systems. In this chapter, performance of some of the most common control schemes is analyzed. In case of negligible time delay, experiments have been carried out by implementing position-position and force-position controllers. Force-velocity control scheme has been used in presence of communication time delays. Experiments have been run with a constant delay of 100 ms in the communication channel. In this case, master-slave interconnection has been described by means of the corresponding scattering variables. Experimental results of the different control schemes have been obtained using an industrial telemanipulator of 6 degrees of freedom manufactured by Kraft Telerobotics.

Keywords

Position Error Texas Instrument Rigid Object Operator Perception Bilateral System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Volpe and P. Khosla. A theoretical and experimental investigation of impact control of manipulators. Int. Journal of Robotics Research, 12(4):351–365, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Janabi-Sharifi. Collision: Modelling, simulation and identification of robotic manipulators interacting with environments. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 13(1):1–44, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Raimondi and L. Galbiati. Manipulators mascot iv used in jet and propects of enhancement. In EURATOM, editor, Teleoperation: Numerical Simulation and Experimental Validation. Edited by M.C. Becquet, pages 139–161, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Schott, K. Hendrich, K. Dring, and H. Bressem. First experience with the electrical master-slave manipulator emsm3. In ANS 7th Topical Meeting on Robotics and Remote Systems, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.K. Bejczy and J.K. Salisbury. Controlling remote manipulators through kinesthetic coupling. ASME Computers in Mechanical Engineering, 2(1):48–60, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Hannaford, L. Wood, D. McAffee, and H. Zak. Performance evaluation of a six axis generalized force reflecting teleoperator. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21:620–633, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.W. Daniel and P.R. McAree. Fundamental limits of performance for force reflecting teleoperation. Int. Journal of Robotics Research, 17(8):811–830, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.J. Fischer. A Novel Input Device for Force Controlof Robots. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.J. Anderson and M.W. Spong. Bilateral control for teleoperators with time delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 34(5):494–501, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Niemeyer and J.E. Slotine. Stable adaptive teleoperation. IEEE Journal of Oceanographic Engineering, 16(1):152–162, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Arcara and C. Melchiorri. Control schemes for teleoperation with time delay: a comparative study. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 38, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Aracil, M. Ferre, M. Hernando, E. Pinto, and J.M. Sebastian. Telerobotic system for live-power line maintenance:robtet. Control Engineering Practice, 10:1271–1281, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Texas Instruments. TMS320F2810 and TMS320F2812, Digital Signal Processors. Data Manual, Texas Instrument. Literature Number: SPRS174J, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Ferre
    • 1
  • Jordi Barrio
    • 1
  • Claudio Melchiorri
    • 2
  • Juan M. Bogado
    • 3
  • Pedro L. Castedo
    • 1
  • Juan M. Ibarra
    • 4
  1. 1.Dpto. Automática, Ing. Electrónica e Inf. IdustrialUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of Electronics, Computer Science and SystemsUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Dpto. de Electronica y CircuitosUniversidad Simón BolivarMirandaVenezuela
  4. 4.Centro de Investigacin y de Estudios Avanzados (CINVESTAV)Instituto Politécnico NacionalMexico DFMéxico

Personalised recommendations