Foot and Ankle: Paediatric Measurements

  • Andrew RobertsEmail author
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


This is a difficult, complex and often confusing topic to the uninitiated for a variety of reasons. These range from a lack of knowledge of the congenital and neuromuscular disorders associated with foot deformities, inexperience in analysing paediatric foot radiographs and lack of understanding of the descriptive terms used to document the abnormalities. Most of the measurements are based on the dorsoplantar (AP) and lateral radiographic views. Importantly the views are frequently obtained on weight bearing or simulated weight bearing (in infants or non-ambulatory patients, weight bearing can be simulated by dorsiflexion stress). The function of the foot is to transmit load, adapt to varying surface conditions and act as a lever for progression with effects at the knee and the hip. Adaptation requires flexibility, and only during weight bearing or simulated weight bearing will the configuration of the bony skeleton allowed by the constraints of the ligamentous structures become apparent.


  1. Abulsaad M, Abdelgaber N (2008) Correlation between clinical outcome of surgically treated clubfeet and different radiological parameters. Acta Orthop Belg 74(4):489–495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aurell Y, Johansson A, Hansson G, Wallander H, Jonsson K (2002) Ultrasound anatomy in the normal neonatal and infant foot: an anatomic introduction to ultrasound assessment of foot deformities. Eur Radiol 12(9):2306–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohler L (1931) Diagnosis, pathology, and treatment of fractures of the os calcis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 13(1):75–89Google Scholar
  4. Clint SA, Morris TP, Shaw OM, Oddy MJ, Rudge B, Barry M (2010) The reliability and variation of measurements of the os calcis angles in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(4):571–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coley BD, Shiels WE, Kean J, Adler BH (2007) Age-dependent dynamic sonographic measurement of pediatric clubfoot. Pediatr Radiol 37(11):1125–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davids JR, McBrayer D, Blackhurst DW (2007) Juvenile hallux valgus deformity: surgical management by lateral hemiepiphyseodesis of the great toe metatarsal. J Pediatr Orthop 27(7):826–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis LA, Hatt WS (1955) Congenital abnormalities of the feet. Radiology 64(6):818–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Gheldere A, Docquier P-L (2008) Analytical radiography of clubfoot after tenotomy. J Pediatr Orthop 28(6):691–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, Mazeau P, Bonnet F (1995) Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 4(2):129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downey DJ, Drennan JC, Garcia JF (1992) Magnetic resonance image findings in congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop 12(2):224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elftman H, Manter J (1935) The evolution of the human foot, with especial reference to the joints. J Anat 70(Pt 1):56–67PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Engel E, Erlick N, Krems I (1983) A simplified metatarsus adductus angle. J Am Podiatry Assoc 73(12):620–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farsetti P, Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV (1994) The long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of untreated and non-operatively treated metatarsus adductus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(2):257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris R, Beath T (1947) Army foot survey. Report. National Research Council of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  15. Howard CB, Benson MK (1992) The ossific nuclei and the cartilage anlage of the talus and calcaneum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(4):620–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ippolito E, Fraracci L, Farsetti P, De Maio F (2004) Validity of the anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle to assess congenital clubfoot correction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(5):1279–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV (1980) Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(1):23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCluney JG, Tinley P (2006) Radiographic measurements of patients with juvenile hallux valgus compared with age-matched controls: a cohort investigation. J Foot Ankle Surg 45(3):161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pekindil G, Aktas S, Saridogan K, Pekindil Y (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging in follow-up of treated clubfoot during childhood. Eur J Radiol 37(2):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pirani S, Outerbridge HK, Sawatzky B (1999) A reliable method of clinically evaluating a virgin clubfoot evaluation. In Proceedings of the 21st SICOT World Congress. SICOTGoogle Scholar
  21. Radler C, Manner HM, Suda R, Burghardt R, Herzenberg JE, Ganger R, Grill F (2007) Radiographic evaluation of idiopathic clubfeet undergoing ponseti treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(6):1177–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Radler C, Egermann M, Riedl K, Ganger R, Grill F (2010) Interobserver reliability of radiographic measurements of contralateral feet of pediatric patients with unilateral clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(14):2427–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ritchie GW, Keim HA (1964) A radiographic analysis of major foot deformities. Can Med Assoc J 91:840–844PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt TL, Weiner DS (1982) Calcaneal fractures in children. An evaluation of the nature of the injury in 56 children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 171:150–155Google Scholar
  25. Simons GW (1977) Analytical radiography of club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59-B(4):485–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Templeton AW, McAlister WH, Zim ID (1965) Standardization of terminology and evaluation of osseous relationships in congenitally abnormal feet. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy, Nucl Med 93:374–381Google Scholar
  27. Vanderwilde R, Staheli LT, Chew DE, Malagon V (1988) Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(3):407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wallander HM (2010) Congenital clubfoot. Aspects on epidemiology, residual deformity and patient reported outcome. Acta Orthop Suppl 81(339):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yeung EHK, Li YH, Ng ON, Chow W (2005) Radiographic assessment of congenital talipes equinovarus: strapping versus forced dorsiflexion. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 13(3):253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Children’s Unit Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic HospitalOswestryUK

Personalised recommendations