Advertisement

Geografische Fallanalyse

  • A. Mokros
  • D. Schinke

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abt Associates Inc (2004) A methodology for evaluating geographic profiling software: Final report. [On-line]. Verfügbarunter: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/maps/gp.pdf (24.04.2006)Google Scholar
  2. Amir M (1971) Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin J, Bottoms AE (1976) The urban criminal: A study in Sheffield. Tavistock, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Beauregard E, Proulx J, Rossmo DK (2005) Spatial patterns of sex offenders: Theoretical, empirical, and practical issues. Aggress Violent Behav 10: 579–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. J Polit Econ 76(2): 169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: The kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations (Oxford statistical science series, vol 18). Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley RA (1984) Paired comparisons: Some basic procedures and examples. In: Krishnaiah PR, Sen PK (eds) Handbook of statistics, vol 4. Nonparametric methods. Elsevier, Amsterdam, S 299–326Google Scholar
  9. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (eds) (1981) Notes on the geometry of crime. In: Environmental criminology. Sage, Beverly Hills CA, pp 27–54Google Scholar
  10. Burhoff D (2003) Handbuch für das strafrechtliche Ermittlungsverfahren, 3. Aufl. ZAP-Verlag, RecklinghausenGoogle Scholar
  11. Burt JE, Barber GM (1996) Elementary statistics for geographers, 2. Aufl. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Canter D (2003) Mapping murder: The secrets of geographical profiling. Virgin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Canter D (2005) Confusing operational predicaments and cognitive explorations: Comments on Rossmo and Snook et al. Appl Cogn Psychol 19: 663–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canter D, Gregory A (1994) Identifying the residential location of rapists. J Forensic Sci Soc 34(3): 169–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canter D, Larkin P (1993) The environmental range of serial rapists. J Environ Psychol 3: 63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canter D, Coffey T, Huntley M, Missen C (2000) Predicting serial killers home base using a decision support tool. J Quant Criminol 16(4): 457–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Capone DL, Nichols WW (1975) Crime and distance: An analysis of offender behavior in space. Proc Assoc Am Geogr 7: 45–49Google Scholar
  18. Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44: 588–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornish DB, Clarke RV (eds) (1986) The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies A, Dale A (1996) Locating the stranger rapist. Med Sci Law 36(2): 146–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dern H, Schu M, Erpenbach H et al. (Hrsg) (2003) Fallanalyse bei der deutschen Polizei: Die Qualitätsstandards der Fallanalyse sowie das Anforderungsprofil und der Ausbildungsgang für Polizeiliche Fallanalytiker in Deutschland. Bundeskriminalamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  22. Dern H, Frönd R, Straub U, Vick J, Witt R (2004) Geografisches Verhalten fremder Täter bei sexuellen Gewaltdelikten. Bundeskriminalamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  23. Dern H, Horn A, Naumann D (2005) Neustrukturierung des Fallanalyseprozesses: Handlungsanleitung für die Erstellung von Fallanalysen. Bundeskriminalamt, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  24. Dietz PE, Hazelwood RR, Warren JI (1990) The sexually sadistic criminal and his offences. Bull Am Acad Psychiat Law 18(2): 163–178Google Scholar
  25. Doney RH (1990) The aftermath of the Yorkshire Ripper: The response of the United Kingdom police service. In: Egger SA (ed) Serial murder: An elusive phenomenon. Praeger, New York, pp 95–112Google Scholar
  26. Erlanson O (1946) The scene of a sex offence as related to the residence of the offender. Am J Police Sci 31: 338–342Google Scholar
  27. Felson M, Clarke RV (1998) Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention (Police research seriespaper 98) London: Home Office, Policing and reducing Crime Unit, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. Verfügbar unter: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/ prgpdfs/fprs98.pdf [21.11.2005]Google Scholar
  28. Gabor T, Gottheil E (1984) Offender characteristics and spatial mobility: An empirical study and some policy implications. Can J Criminol 26: 267–281Google Scholar
  29. Goodwill AM, Alison LJ (2005) Sequential angulation, spatial dispersion and consistency of distance attack patterns from home in serial murder, rape and burglary. Psychol Crime Law 11(2): 161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gottfredson M, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford CAGoogle Scholar
  31. Groth N, Burgess AW, Holmstrom L (1977) Rape: Power, anger and sexuality. Am J Psychiat 134(11): 1239–1243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hare RD (2004) Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R): Technical manual 2nd edn. Multi Health Systems, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  33. Hunter SM, Hemphill J, Anderson G, Hare RD (2003, im Februar) Psychopathy and geographic mobility. Vortrag anläβlich der 30. Jahrestagung der Western Society of Criminology, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  34. Janke F, Henningsen J (1995) Darstellung und überprüfung eines von David Canter entwickelten Computerprogramms zur Identifizierung des Wohnortes von Serienvergewaltigern. Fachhochschule für Öffentliche Verwaltung, Fachbereich Polizei, Hamburg: Unveröffentlichte HausarbeitGoogle Scholar
  35. Kind SS (1987) Navigational ideas and the Yorkshire Ripper investigation. J Navigat 40(3): 385–393Google Scholar
  36. Kocsis RN, Irwin HJ (1997) An analysis of spatial patterns in Australian offences of serial rapearson and burglary: The utility of the circle theory of environmental range for psychological profiling. Psychiat Psychol Law 4(2): 195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koppen PJ van, Jansen WJ (1998) The road to robbery: Travel patterns in commercial robberies. Br J Criminol 38: 230–247Google Scholar
  38. Koppen PJ van, Keijser JW de (1997) Desisting distance decay: On the aggregation of individual crime trips. Criminology 35(3): 505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuhn HW, Kuenne RE (1962) An efficient algorithm for the numerical solution of the generalized Weber problem in spatial economics. J Regional Sci 4(2): 21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Laukkanen M, Santtila P (2006) Predicting the residential location of a serial commercial robber. Forensic Sci Int 157(1): 71–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. LeBeau JL (1987) The journey to rape: Geographic distance and the rapist,s method of approaching the victim. J Police Sci Admin 15: 129–136Google Scholar
  42. Lehmann G (2002) Statistik. Spektrum, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  43. Levine N (2004a) CrimeStat: A spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations (v3.0) [Computerprogramm]. Ned Levine Associates Houston TX and the National Institute of Justice, Washington DC, May. Verfügbarunter: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/CRIMESTAT [10.04.2006]Google Scholar
  44. Levine N (2004b) CrimeStat: A spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations (v3.0): Manual [Programmhandbuch]. Ned Levine Associates Houston TX and the National Institute of Justice, Washington DC, May. Verfügbar unter: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/CRIMESTAT [10.04.2006]Google Scholar
  45. Lind AW (1930) Some ecological patterns of community disorganization in Honolulu. Am J Sociol 31: 206–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Luce RD (1959) Individual choice behavior. John Wiley u. Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Müller T (2001) Methodik der kriminalpsychologischen fallbezogenen Tatortanalyse: Eine überprüfung am Beispiel der BBA-Bombenanschläge durch Gegenüberstellung der kriminalpsychologischen und der nachfolgend erstellten forensisch-psychiatrischen Erkenntnisse. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation: Leopold-Franzens-Universität, InnsbruckGoogle Scholar
  48. Philipps PD (1980) Characteristics and typology of the journey to crime. In: Georges-Abeyie DE, Harries KD (eds) Crime: A spatial perspective. Columbia University Press, New York, pp S167–179Google Scholar
  49. Pyle GF (1976) Spatial and temporal aspects of crime in Cleveland, Ohio. Am Behav Sci 20(2): 175–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ratcliffe JH (2004) Crime mapping and the training needs of law enforcement. Eur J Crim Policy Res 10: 65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rengert GF (1996) The geography of illegal drugs. Westview Press, Boulder CLGoogle Scholar
  52. Rengert GF, Wasilchik JV (1985) Suburban burglary: A time and a place for everything. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield ILGoogle Scholar
  53. Rengert GF, Piquero AR, Jones PR (1999) Distance decay re-examined. Criminology 37: 427–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rhodes WM, Conly C (1981) Crime and mobility: An empirical study. In: Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL (eds) Environmental criminology. Sage, Beverly Hills CA, pp 167–188)Google Scholar
  55. Rossmo DK (1993) Target patterns of serial murderers: A methodological note. Am J Crim Just 171–221Google Scholar
  56. Rossmo DK (2000) Geographic profiling. CRC Press, Boca Raton FLGoogle Scholar
  57. Rossmo DK (2005) Commentary: Geographic heuristics or shortcuts to failure? Response to Snook et al. Appl Cogn Psychol 19: 651–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rossmo DK, Davies A, Patrick M (2004) Exploring the geo-demographic and distance relationships between stranger rapists and their offences (special interest series paper 16). London: Home Office, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Research, Development and Statistics DirectorateGoogle Scholar
  59. Santtila P, Zappalà A, Laukkanen M, Picozzi M (2003) Testing the utility of a geographical profiling approach in three rape series of a single offender: A case study. Forensic Sci Int 31(1): 42–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Santtila P, Laukkanen M, Carlsson K-M et al. (2004) How far from home offenders travel: An international comparison of crime trips in homicide, rape, burglary, and robbery cases (Poliisiammattikorkeakoulun Tutkimuksia 18). Police College of Finland, EspooGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith CJ, Patterson GE (1980) Cognitive mapping and the subjective geography of crime. In: Georges-Abeyie DE, Harries KD (eds) Crime: A spatial perspective. Columbia University Press, New York, pp S205–218Google Scholar
  62. Snook B (1999) Geographical profiling: Investigation of parameters influencing ≫search cost≪ in Dragnet, Unveröffentlichte Master,s Thesis: University of LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  63. Snook B (2000) Utility of futility? A provisional examination of the utility of a geographical decision support tool. Vortrag anlässlich der 4th International ≫Crime Mapping≪ Conference ≫Wheredunit? Investigating the role of place in crime and criminality≪, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  64. Snook B, Canter D, Bennell C (2002) Predicting the home location of serial offenders: A preliminary comparison of the accuracy of human judges with a geographic profiling system. Behav Sci Law 20: 109–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Snook B, Taylor PJ, Bennell C (2004) Geographic profiling: The fast, frugal, and accurate way. Appl Cogn Psychol 18: 105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Snook B, Taylor PJ, Bennell C (2005a) Shortcuts to geographic profiling success: A reply to Rossmo (2005). Appl Cogn Psychol 19: 655–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Snook B, Cullen RM, Mokros A, Harbort S (2005b) Serial murderers’ spatial decisions: Factors that influence crime location choice. J Investigat Psychol Offender Profiling 2: 147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Snook B, Zito M, Bennell C, Taylor PJ (2005c) On the complexity and accuracy of geographic profiling strategies. J Quant Criminol 21(1): 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Straub U, Witt R (2003, Januar) Polizeiliche Vorerkenntnisse von Vergewaltigern. Kriminalistik 19–30Google Scholar
  70. Tamura M, Suzuki M (1997) Criminal profiling research on serial arson: Examination of circle hypothesis estimating offender,s residential area. Reports of the National Research Institute of Police Science: Research on Prevention of Crime and Delinquency 38: 1Google Scholar
  71. Taylor PJ (1975) Distance decay models in spatial interactions (Concepts and techniques in modern geography, vol 2). Invicta Press, AshfordGoogle Scholar
  72. Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55: 189–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Turner S (1969) Delinquency and distance. In: Sellin T, Wolfgang ME (eds) Delinquency: Selected studies. Wiley & Sons, New York London, pp S11–26Google Scholar
  74. Warren JI, Reboussin R, Hazelwood RR (1995) The geographic and temporal sequencing of serial rape (Federal Bureau of Investigation). US Government Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  75. Warren JI, Reboussin R, Hazelwood RR, Cummings A, Gibbs N, Trumbetta S (1998) Crime scene and distance correlates of serial rape. J Quant Criminol 14: 35–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weber A (1909) Über den Standort der Industrien. J.C.B. Mohr, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  77. Wiles P, Costello A (2000) The ’road to nowhere’: The evidence for travelling criminals (Research study 207). London: Home Office, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Research, Development and Statistics DirectorateGoogle Scholar
  78. White CR (1932) The relation of felonies to environmental factors in Indianapolis. Social Forces 10: 498–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Young WJ (1975) Distance decay values and shopping center size. Profession Geogr 27(3): 304–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zipf GK (1972) Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Hafner, New York (Original erschienen 1949)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Mokros
  • D. Schinke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations