Advertisement

The Notion of Reparations as a Restorative Justice Measure

  • Antonio Buti
Conference paper

The term ‘reparations’ has many possible meanings but at its most basic it refers to restoring justice, atoning and making amends for a wrong. Reparations seek to repair injuries caused by wrongs. It often involves looking backwards to the wrong and looking forward to repairing and reconciliation.

Since World War II and particularly from the early 1990s, there has been an escalation of demands for reparations for historical injustices. Governments and their citizens are being asked to respond to the policies and practices of earlier governments or their agents by taking measures to address the harm and injustices that they perpetrated. It should be added that churches and private organization have also had demands placed on them to make redress for past wrongful acts.

Keywords

Distributive Justice Restorative Justice International Criminal Court Residential School Reparation Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews PE (2004) Reparations for apartheid's victims: the path to reconciliation. Depaul Law Rev 55:1155Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle (1962) Nicomachean ethics. Martin Ostwald trans., Bobbs-Merrill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkan E (2000) Introduction. In: Barkan E. The guilt of nations: restitution and negotiating historical injustices. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkan E (2000a) Restitution in East Central Europe: deserving and undeserving victims. In: Barkan E (ed) The guilt of nations: restitution and negotiating historical injustices. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Barkan E (2000b) Sex slaves: comfort women and Japanese guilt. In: Barkan E. The guilt of nations: restitution and negotiating historical injustices. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Benson P (1991–1992) The basis of corrective justice and its relation to distributive justice. IOWA Law Rev 77:515, 535Google Scholar
  7. Birks P (1985) An introduction to the law of restitution. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Blagg H (1998) Restorative visions and restorative justice practices: conferencing, ceremony and reconciliation in Australia. Curr Issues Crim Justice 10:5Google Scholar
  9. Bradford W (2005) Beyond Reparations: An American Indian Theory of Justice. OHIO State Law J 66(1):3–4Google Scholar
  10. Braithwaite J (2002) Setting standards for restorative justice. Br J Criminol 42:563, 564, 568–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braithwaite J, Strang H (2001) Introduction: restorative justice and civil society. In: Braithwaite J, Strang H (eds) Restorative justice and civil society. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooks RL (2004–2005) Getting reparations for slavery right — a response to Posner and Vermeule. Notre Dame Law Rev 80:251, 254–255, 268, 272–284Google Scholar
  13. Buti T (2001) Canadian residential schools — the demands for reparations. Flinders J Law Reform 5:225Google Scholar
  14. Buti A (2007) Sir Ronald Wilson: A Matter of Conscience, University of Western Australia Press, CrawleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Burrows A (2002) The law of restitution, 2nd edn. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman JL (1995) The practice of corrective justice. In: Owen GD (ed) Philosophical foundations of tort law. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper-Stephenson K (2003) Reparations: theoretical underpinning for reparations: a constitutional tort perspective. Windsor Year Bk Access Justice 22:3, 5, 11, 17Google Scholar
  18. Cornwall A (2002) Restoring identity: Final report of the moving forward consultation project (PIAC)Google Scholar
  19. Cunneen C (2001) Reparations and restorative justice: responding to the gross violation of human rights. In: Strang H, Braithwaite J (eds) Restorative justice and civil society. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Cunneen C (2003) Legal and political responses to the stolen generation: Lessons from Ireland. Indigenous Law Bull 5:14,16Google Scholar
  21. Cunneen C (2006) Exploring the relationship between reparations, the gross violation of human rights, and restorative justice. In: Handbook of restorative justice: a global perspective. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Dauenhauer BP, Wells ML (2000–2001) Corrective justice and constitutional torts. Ga Law Rev 35:903Google Scholar
  23. Dworkins R (2000) Sovereign virtueGoogle Scholar
  24. Galaway B, Hudson J (eds) (1996) Restorative justice: international perspectives. Criminal Justice Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Garkawe S (2003) Victims and the International criminal court: three major issues. Int Crim Law Rev 3:334, 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garkawe S (2003) The South African truth and reconciliation commission: a suitable model to enhance the role and rights of the victims of gross violations of human rights. Melb Univ Law Rev 24, 334, 345Google Scholar
  27. Haebich A (2000) Broken circles: fragmenting indigenous families. Fremantle Arts Centre Press, FremantleGoogle Scholar
  28. HREOC (1997) Bringing them home: national inquiry into the separation of aboriginal and torres strait islander children from their families. Australian Government Publishing Service, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  29. Jonas W (1998) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commissioner, Social Justice Rep (Chapter 1)Google Scholar
  30. Logue (2004) Reparations as distribution. Boston Univ Law Rev 84:1319, 1326, 1328, 1342– 1343, 1344Google Scholar
  31. McCarthy EH (1999) Will the amnesty process foster reconciliation among South Africans? In: Brooks RL (ed) When sorry isn't enoughGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller JR (1997) Shingwauk's vision; a history of native residential schools. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  33. Milloy J (1999) A National crime: the Canadian government and the residential school system 1879 to 1986. University of Manitoba Press, WinnipegGoogle Scholar
  34. Mosley A (2002–2003) Affirmative action as a form of reparations. Univ Memphis Law Rev 33:353, 358Google Scholar
  35. O'Brien P, Bond J (2002) Are we helping them home?: surveys of progress in the implementation of the bringing them home recommendations. National Sorry Day CommitteeGoogle Scholar
  36. O'Connor P (2000) Squaring the circle: how Canada is dealing with the legacy of its Indian residential schools experiment. Aust J Hum Rights 9Google Scholar
  37. Pierik R (2006) Reparations for luck egalitarians. J Soc Philos 37:423, 434, 436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Posner E, Vermeule A (2003) Reparations for slavery and other historical injustices. Columbia Law Rev 103:689, 691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Roy JG (1961) Is the law of responsibility of states for injuries to aliens a part of universal international law? Am J Int Law 55:863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Torpey J (2001) Making whole what has been smashed': reflections on reparations. J Mod His 73:333, 335–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Verwoerd W (1999) Justice after apartheid: reflections on the South African TRC. In: Brooks RL (ed) When sorry isn't enoughGoogle Scholar
  43. Weinrib EJ (2000) Restitutionary damages as corrective justice. Theor Inquiries Law 1:1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Buti
    • 1
  1. 1.Law School, University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations