Advertisement

Shock Waves pp 283-293 | Cite as

Nozzle development for an expansion tunnel

  • M. P. Scott
  • P. A. Jacobs
  • R. G. Morgan
Conference paper

Abstract

At the present time, ground based test facilities are unable to provide data for the full range of scramjet flight conditions. However, an opportunity exists in which the hardware for the RHYFL shock tunnel could be utilized to create a large expansion tube, RHYFL-X. This paper is part of a continuing project to investigate the use of RHYFL-X as a scramjet test facility. The long term aim of this project is to further validate the previous numerical studies and the claims that the attachment of a nozzle onto an expansion tube will not only increase the core flow diameter but also increase the steady time available for testing. This present paper reviews the literature available for expansion tunnels and presents potential operating conditions for the X2 expansion tube with its new single stage driver.

Keywords

Compression Ratio Shock Tube Shock Speed Expansion Tunnel Shock Tunnel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.J. Bakos, J.F. Calleja, J.I. Erdos, A.H. Auslender, M.A. Sussman, and G.J. Wilson: ‘Design, Calibration and Analysis of a Tunnel Mode of Operation for the HYPULSE Facility’. In: Proceedings of 19th AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Conference, June 1996. AIAA Paper 96-2194Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L.B. Callis: A theoretical study of the effect on expansion-tube performance of area changes at primary and secondary diaphragm stations. Technical Note D-3303, NASA, March, 1966Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.B. Callis: An analysis of supersonic flow phenomena in conical nozzles by a method of characteristics. Technical Note D-3550, NASA, August, 1966Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Chinitz, J.I. Erdos, R. Oussama, G.Y. Anderson, and D.M. Bushnell: Facility opportunities and associated stream chemistry considerations for hypersonic air-breathing propulsion. AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power 10(1), 6 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.S.M. Chue, R.J. Bakos, C.-Y. Tsai, and A. Betti: ‘The Design of an Expansion Tunnel Nozzle in HYPULSE’. In: Proceedings of 23rd International Symposium on Shock Waves, Fort Worth, Texas, July 2001, pp. 356–366Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.J. Doolan: A Two-stage Free-piston Driver for Hypervelocity Expansion Tubes. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, 1997Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Hertzberg, W.E. Smith, H.S. Glick, and W. Squire: Modifications of the shock tube for the generation of hypersonic flow. Technical Note 55–14, Arnold Engineering Development Center, March 1955Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Hurdle and A. Rolland: RHYFL — a tool for attaining hypersonic flight. Threshold: An Engineering Journal of Power Technology 6, 42 (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.A. Jacobs: IMOC: Interactive method-of-characteristics for two-dimensional supersonic flow. Technical Report Report 3/00, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, 2000Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.A. Jacobs: Lid: A computer program for the simulation of transient — facilities. Technical Report Report 1/99, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, 1999Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.A. Jacobs: MB.CNS: A computer program for the simulation of transient compressible. Technical Report Report 10/96, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, 1996Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P.A. Jacobs and C.M. Gourlay: An interactive method-of-characteristics program for gas dynamic calculations. International Journal of Applied Engineering Education 7(3), 242 (1991)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Knöös: Theoretical and experimental study of piston gas-heating with laminar energy losses. AIAA Journal 9(11), 2119 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I.A. Leyva: ‘Study of the Addition of a Divergent Nozzle to an Expansion Tube for Increasing Test Time’. In: Proceedings of 18th AIAA Aerospace Ground Testing Conference, June 1994. AIAA Paper 94-2533Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C.G. Miller III: ‘Operational Experience in the Langley Expansion Tube with Various Gases and Preliminary Results in the Expansion Tunnel’. In: Proceedings of AIAA 9th Aerodynamic Testing Conference, Arlington, Texas, June 1976 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.G. Miller III and J.J. Jones: ‘Development and Performance of the NASA Langley Research Center Expansion Tube/Tunnel, a Hypersonic-Hypervelocity Real-Gas Facility’. In: Proceedings of Shock Tubes and Waves: 14th International Symposium on Shock Tubes and Waves, Sydney, Australia, August, 1983 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. G. Morgan: A review of the use of expansion tubes for creating superorbital. In: Proceedings of 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 1997. AIAA Paper 97-0279Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G.D. Norfleet, J.J. Lacey Jr., and J.D. Whitfield: ‘Results of an Experimental Investigation of the Performance of an Expansion Tube’. In: Proceedings of Fourth Hypervelocity Techniques Symposium, Arnold Air Force Station, Tennessee, November 1965 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G.D. Norfleet and F.C. Loper: A theoretical real-gas analysis of the expansion tunnel. Technical Report 66-71, Arnold Engineering Development Center, June 1966Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.A. Palmer: Measurement of Heat Transfer in Superorbital Flows. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, 1999Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E.L. Resler and D.E. Bloxsom: Very high number flows by unsteady flow principles. Limited distribution monograph, Cornell University Graduate School of Aeronautical Engineering, January 1952Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R.J. Stalker: Development of a hypervelocity wind tunnel. The Aeronautical Journal 76, 374 (1972)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Stewart: Predicted Scramjet Testing Capabilities of the Proposed RHYFL-X Expansion Tube. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, 2004Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. Stewart, R. G. Morgan, P. A. Jacobs, and D. M. Jenkins: The RHYFL facility as a high performance expansion tube for scramjet testing. In: Proceedings of 21st AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, June 2000 AIAA Paper 2000-2595Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B.S. Stewart, P.A. Jacobs, and R.G. Morgan: ‘The Starting Processes of an Expansion Tube Nozzle’. In: Proceedings of 23rd International Symposium on Shock Waves, July 2001 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B.S. Stewart, R.G. Morgan, P.A. Jacobs, K.J. Austin, and D.M. Jenkins: Establishment of test conditions in the RHYFL-X facility. In: Proceedings of 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibition, July 2001. IAA Paper 2001-3678Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    O. Sudnitsin: Design and Testing of Expansion Tube with Area Change. Master’s thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, 2000Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R.L. Trimpi: A preliminary theoretical study of the expansion tube, a new device for pro-ducing high-enthalpy short-duration hypersonic gas flows. Technical Report R-133, NASA, 1962Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    R.L. Trimpi and L.B. Callis: A perfect-gas analysis of the expansion tunnel, a modification to the expansion tube. Technical Report R-233, NASA Langley Research Center, 1965Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. Scott
    • 1
  • P. A. Jacobs
    • 1
  • R. G. Morgan
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for HypersonicsThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations