Advertisement

Shock Waves pp 789-794 | Cite as

Pulse detonation in a chamber with divergent nozzle

  • H. H. Li
  • Y. J. Zhu
  • J. M. Yang
  • M. Sun
  • X. S. Luo
Conference paper

Abstract

Detonation wave diffraction is a basic research topics of detonation dynamics and one of most important phenomena in pulse detonation engine with nozzle. Double exposure holographic interferometry, which can obtain more quantitative information compared with con- ventional visualization method such as schlieren photographic, was used to study the flow field after detonation wave. A numerical simulation based on the adaptive finite volume method with finite rate chemical reaction model was carried out to compare with the experiment result. It was found that the combination of numerical simulation with experiment can help us for better understanding of the mechanism of various phenomena accompanied with detonation diffraction process.

Keywords

Shock Wave Detonation Wave Initial Pressure Reflect Shock Wave Pulse Detonation Engine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Eidelman: Pulse Detonation Engine: A status Review and Technology Development Road Map. AIAA paper 97-2740 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Kailasanath: A review of research on pulse detonation engine nozzle. AIAA Paper 01-3932 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chiping Li, K. Kailasanath: Detonation diffraction in pulse detonation engines. AIAA 2000-3470 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. White: Turbulent structure in gaseous detonations. Phys. Fluids 4, 465 (1961)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Soloukhin: Multiheaded structure of gaseous detonation. Combust. Flame 9, 51 (1965)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.E. Shepherd, F. Pintgen et al: The structure of the detonation front in gases. AIAA 2002-0773 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robert J. Kee, Fran M. Rupley et al: Chemkin-III: a fort ran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical and plasma kinetics, UC-405, SAND96-8216, Unlimited Release, Printed May 1996Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Sun, K. Takayama: Conservative smoothing on an adaptive quadrilateral grid. J. Comput. Phys. 150 143 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. N. Brown, G. D. Byrne et al: VODE, A variable-coefficient ODE solver. SIAM J. Sei. Stat. Comput. 10 (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. H. Li
    • 1
  • Y. J. Zhu
    • 1
  • J. M. Yang
    • 1
  • M. Sun
    • 2
  • X. S. Luo
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Science and Technology of ChinaHefei, Anhui ProvinceChina
  2. 2.Shock Wave Research Center, Institute of Fluid ScienceTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Applied PhysicsEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations