Advertisement

Actors or Agents? Defining the Concept of Relational Agency in (Historical) Wildlife Encounters

  • Mieke RoscherEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Animal Studies book series (CAS, volume 4)

Abstract

Concepts of animal agency are more often than not exemplified using the relationship between humans and domesticated animals as proofs for their making a difference in this world. This is particular the case for the conceptualization of historical human-animal encounters. In order to also include so called “wild” animals in historical narratives this article therefore argues for an expansion of the idea of relationality to frame both the encounter as well as the space of encounter as relational. Using the example of the European bison (wisent) and the American bison (buffalo), it argues that spatial relations are fundamental in determining just how interspecies relationships work and that by exploring spatiotemporal arrangements of the past, the array of possible animal agency can be laid out and uncovered. It also calls for categorizing ‘wild’ as a specific form of relationship, producing a specific cultural animal type that should be regarded alongside forms of domestication and other encounters with animals when theorizing about animal agency.

References

  1. Agrawal, Arun. “Adaptive Management in Transboundary Protected Areas: The Bialowieza National Park and Biosphere Reserve as a Case Study.” Environmental Conservation, vol. 27, no. 4, 2000, pp. 326–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahrens, Theodor. “The Present Status of the European Bison or Wisent.” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 2, no. 2, 1921, pp. 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, Virginia DeJohn. Creatures of Empire: How Domestic Animals Transformed Early America. Oxford UP, 2004.Google Scholar
  4. The American Bison Society. Annual Report of the American Bison Society, 1905–1907. The Society, 1908.Google Scholar
  5. Bamforth, Douglas B. “Historical Documents and Bison Ecology on the Great Plains.” The Plains Anthropologist, vol. 32, no. 115, 1987, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baratay, Éric. Point de vue animal: Une autre version de l’histoire. Seuil, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, John. Why Look at Animals? Penguin, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. Best, Joel. Introduction. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior, by Erving Goffman, Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Blavascunas, Eunice. “Signals in the Forest: Cultural Boundaries of Science in Bialowieza, Poland.” New Natures: Joining Environmental History with Science and Technology Studies, ed. by Finn Arne Jorgensson, Dolly Jorgenson, and Sarah Pritchard, Pittsburgh UP, 2013, pp. 118–131.Google Scholar
  10. Bobiec, Andrzej. “Bialowieza Primeval Forest.” International Journal of Wilderness, vol. 8, no. 3, 2002, pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
  11. Buller, Henry. “Reconfiguring Wild Spaces.” Routledge Handbook of Human-Animal Studies, ed. by Garry Marvin and Susan McHugh, Routledge, 2014, pp. 233–245.Google Scholar
  12. Burton, Lloyd. “Wild Sacred Icon or Woolly Cow? Culture and the Legal Reconstruction of the American Bison.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, vol. 23, no. 2, 2000, pp. 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carter, Bob, and Nickie Charles. “Animals, Agency and Resistance.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 43, no. 3, 2013, pp. 322–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Comstock, Theo. B. “The Yellowstone National Park.” American Naturalist, vol. 8, no. 2, 1874, pp. 65–79.Google Scholar
  15. Cronon, William. “The Trouble with Wilderness: Or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature.” Environmental History, vol. 1, no. 1, 1996, pp. 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cudworth, Erika, and Stephen Hobden. “Liberation for Straw Dogs? Old Materialism, New Materialism, and the Challenge of an Emancipatory Posthumanism.” Occupying Subjectivity: Being and Becoming Radical in the 21st Century, ed. by Chris Rossdale, Routledge, 2017, pp. 133–146.Google Scholar
  17. Despret, Vinciane. “From Secret Agents to Interagency.” History and Theory, vol. 52, no. 4, 2013, pp. 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Disposition of Surplus Elk, Buffalo, Bear, Beaver, and Predatory Animals. 16 U.S. Code, Sec. 36, 42 Stat. 1214, Government Printing Office, 24 Jan. 1923.Google Scholar
  19. Dolph, James A., and C. Ivar Dolph. “The American Bison: His Annihilation and Preservation.” Montana: The Magazine of Western History, vol. 25, no. 3, 1975, pp. 14–25.Google Scholar
  20. Driessen, Clemens, and Jamie Lorimer. “Back-Breeding the Aurochs: The Heck Brothers, National Socialism and Imagined Geographies for Nonhuman Lebensraum.” Hitler’s Geographies: The Spatialities of the Third Reich, ed. by Paolo Giaccaria and Claudio Minca, U of Chicago P, 2016, pp. 138–157.Google Scholar
  21. Flack, Andrew. “‘In Sight, Insane’: Animal Agency, Captivity and the Frozen Wilderness in the Late-Twentieth Century.” Environment and History, vol. 22, no. 4, 2016, pp. 629–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Franke, Mary Ann. “Captivity for Yellowstone Bison: Their Doom or Salvation?” Montana: The Magazine of Western History, vol. 55, no. 2, 2005, pp. 2–13.Google Scholar
  23. Gautschi, Andreas. Der Reichsjägermeister: Fakten und Legenden um Hermann Göring, Nimrod, 2006.Google Scholar
  24. Gissibl, Bernhard, et al. “A Bavarian Serengeti: Space, Race and Time in the Entangled History of Nature Conservation in East Africa and Germany.” Civilizing Nature: National Parks in Global Historical Perspective, ed. by Gissibl et al., Berghahn Books, 2012, pp. 102–119.Google Scholar
  25. Gissibl, Bernhard, et al. “Introduction: Towards a Global History of National Parks.” Civilizing Nature: National Parks in Global Historical Perspective, ed. by Gissibl et al., Berghahn Books, 2012, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  26. Haraway, Donna J. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, people, and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm P, 2003.Google Scholar
  27. Harris, Kerry, and Yannis Hamilakis. “Beyond the Wild, the Feral, and the Domestic: Lessons from Prehistoric Crete.” Routledge Handbook of Human-Animal Studies, ed. by Garry Marvin and Susan McHugh, Routledge, 2014, pp. 97–113.Google Scholar
  28. Hayward, Matt W. “Conservation Management for the Past, Present and Future.” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 18, no. 4, 2009, pp. 765–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hornaday, William T. The Extermination of the American Bison. Washington, 1889.Google Scholar
  30. Hribal, Jason. “Animals, Agency, and Class: Writing the History of Animals from Below.” Human Ecology Review, vol. 14, no. 1, 2007, pp. 101–112.Google Scholar
  31. Hurn, Samantha. Humans and Other Animals: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Interactions. Pluto P, 2012.Google Scholar
  32. Isenberg, Andrew C. The Destruction of the Bison: An Environmental History, 1750–1920. Cambridge UP, 2000.Google Scholar
  33. Isenberg, Andrew C. “The Return of the Bison: Nostalgia, Profit, and Preservation.” Environmental History, vol. 2, no. 2, 1997, pp. 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Isenberg, Andrew C. “Toward a Policy of Destruction: Buffaloes, Law, and the Market, 1803–83.” Great Plains Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 4, 1992, pp. 227–241.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, Karen. “Unpacking Yellowstone: The American National Park in Global Perspective.” Civilizing Nature: National Parks in Global Historical Perspective, ed. by Bernhard Gissibl et al., Berghahn Books, 2012, pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
  36. Kantor, Isaac. “Ethnic Cleansing and America’s Creation of National Parks.” Pub. Land & Resources L. Rev., vol. 28, 2007, pp. 41–63.Google Scholar
  37. Kean, Hilda. “Challenges for Historians Writing Animal-Human History: What is Really Enough?” Anthrozoös, vol. 25, sup. 1, 2012, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar
  38. Keiter, Robert B. “Greater Yellowstone’s Bison: Unravelling of an Early American Wildlife Conservation Achievement.” The Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 61, no. 1, 1997, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kerley, G. I. H., R. Kowalczyk, and J. P. G. M. Cromsigt. “Conservation Implications of the Refugee Species Concept and the European Bison: King of the Forest or Refugee in a Marginal Habitat?” Ecography, vol. 35, no. 6, 2012, pp. 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lancaster, Zachary L. “Restraining Yellowstone’s Roaming Bison.” Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, vol. 20, no. 2, 2005, pp. 423–450.Google Scholar
  41. Lavigne, Jean. “Where the Buffalo Roam: Boundaries and the Politics of Scale in the Yellowstone Region.” GeoJournal, vol. 58, no. 4, 2002, pp. 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lorimer, Jamie. “Elephants as Companion Species: The Lively Biogeographies of Asian Elephant Conservation in Sri Lanka.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 35, no. 4, 2010, pp. 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lorimer, Jamie. “Nonhuman Charisma.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 25, 2007, pp. 911–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lulka, David. “Consuming Timothy Treadwell: Redefining Nonhuman Agency in Light of Herzog’s Grizzly Man.” Animals and Agency: An Interdisciplinary Exploration, ed. by S. McFarland and Ryan Hediger, Brill, 2009, pp. 67–88.Google Scholar
  45. Lunney, Daniel. “Charismatic Megafauna.” The Encyclopaedia of Sustainability: Vol. 5. Ecosystem Management and Sustainability, Berkshire Publishing, 2012, pp. 63–66.Google Scholar
  46. Martin, Jennifer Adams. “When Sharks (don’t) Attack: Wild Animal Agency in Historical Narratives.” Environmental History, vol. 16, no. 3, 2011, pp. 451–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maurstad, Anita, Dona Davis, and Sarah Cowles. “Co‐Being and Intra‐Action in Horse-Human Relationships: A Multi‐Species Ethnography of Be(com)ing Human and Be(com)ing Horse.” Social Anthropology, vol. 21, no. 3, 2013, pp. 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McHugh, Susan. “Literary Animal Agents.” PMLA, vol. 124, no. 2, 2009, pp. 487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mysterud, A., et al. “Population Ecology and Conservation of Endangered Megafauna: The Case of European Bison in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland.” Animal Conservation, vol. 10, no. 1, 2007, pp. 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nance, Susan. Entertaining Elephants: Animal Agency and the Business of the American Circus. JHU P, 2013.Google Scholar
  51. Nash, Linda. “The Agency of Nature or the Nature of Agency?” Environmental History, vol. 10, no. 1, 2005, pp. 67–69.Google Scholar
  52. Notzke, Claudia. “An Exploration into Political Ecology and Nonhuman Agency: The Case of the Wild Horse in Western Canada.” The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, vol. 57, no. 4, 2013, pp. 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Philo, Chris, and Chris Wilbert. Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human-Animal Relations. Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  54. Plumb, Glenn E., and Rosemary Sucec. “A Bison Conservation History in the US National Parks.” Journal of the West, vol. 45, no. 2, 2006, pp. 22–27.Google Scholar
  55. Quammen, David. “Learning to Let the Wild Be Wild in Yellowstone.” National Geographic, vol. 5, 2016, www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2016/05/yellowstone-national-parks-part-1/. Accessed 6 Jan. 2017.
  56. Rogers, Katie. “Yellowstone Bison Calf Is Euthanized After Riding in Tourists’ S.U.V.” The New York Times, 16 May 2016, www.nytimes.com/2016/05/17/us/yellowstone-bison-calf-is-euthanized-after-trip-in-tourists-trunk.html?_r=0. Accessed 6 Jan. 2017.
  57. Roscher, Mieke. “New Political History and the Writing of Animal Lives.” The Routledge Handbook of Animal-Human History, ed. by Hilda Kean and Philipp Howell, Routledge, 2018, pp. 53–75.Google Scholar
  58. “Rules and fees in BNP.” Białowieża National Park, 17 Oct. 2016, bpn.com.pl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=111&Itemid=181.
  59. Schama, Simon. Landscape and Memory. Knopf, 1995.Google Scholar
  60. Schullery, Paul. “‘Buffalo’ Jones and the Bison Herd in Yellowstone: Another Look.” Montana: The Magazine of Western History, vol. 26, no. 3, 1976, pp. 40–51.Google Scholar
  61. Schwartz, Karlene. “Wildlife Worldwide.” BioScience, vol. 55, no. 7, 2005, pp. 623–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ścibor, Julian. “Der Wisent (Bison Bonasus L.) im Wald von Bialowieza.” Acta Theriologica, vol. 2, no. 14, 1958, pp. 296–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shaw, David Gary. “The Torturer’s Horse: Agency and Animals in History.” History and Theory, vol. 52, no. 4, 2013, pp. 146–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shaw, David Gary. “A Way with Animals.” History and Theory, vol. 52, no. 4, 2013, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spence, Mark David. Dispossessing the Wilderness: Indian Removal and the Making of the National Parks. Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
  66. State of Montana, Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, and U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Gallatin National Forest. Yellowstone Bison: Background and Issues: A Cooperatively Prepared Narrative of Bison Management History and Management Issues. National Park Service, 1990.Google Scholar
  67. Steinbrecher, Aline, and Gesine Krüger. “Animals.” Trans. by Michael Osmann. European History Online (EGO), ed. by the Leibniz Institute of European History (IEG), 6 Sep. 2016, www.ieg-ego.eu/steinbrechera-kruegerg-2015-en. Accessed 16 Jan. 2017.
  68. United States National Park Service. Yellowstone National Park (N.P.), Master Plan (MT, ID, WY): Environmental Impact Statement. Department of Interior, 1974.Google Scholar
  69. Walker, Brett L. “Animals and the Intimacy of History.” History and Theory, vol. 52, no. 4, 2013, pp. 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wandesforde-Smith, Geoffrey, and Lynette A. Hart. “Exploring the Borderlands between Wild and Non-Wild Animals: Wildlife Law and Policy in Transition.” Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, vol. 18, no. 4, 2015, pp. 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Watts, Christopher. “Relational Archaeologies: Roots and Routes.” Relational Archaeologies: Humans, Animals, Things, ed. by Watts, Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
  72. Weil, Kari. Thinking Animals: Why Animal Studies Now? Columbia UP, 2012.Google Scholar
  73. Whatmore, Sarah, and Lorraine Thorne. “Wild(er)ness: Reconfiguring the Geographies of Wildlife.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 23, no. 4, 1998, pp. 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilkie, Rhoda. “Multispecies Scholarship and Encounters: Changing Assumptions at the Human-Animal Nexus.” Sociology, vol. 49, no. 2, 2015, pp. 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wołk, Elżbieta, and Małgorzata Krasińska. “Has the Condition of European Bison Deteriorated Over Last Twenty Years?” Acta Theriologica, vol. 49, no. 3, 2004, pp. 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Woolfson, Esther. Field Notes from a Hidden City: An Urban Nature Diary. Counterpoint, 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KasselGermany

Personalised recommendations