Advertisement

Sprachverstehen in der Artificial Intelligence

  • Ernst Buchberger
Chapter
Part of the Leitfäden der angewandten Informatik book series (XLAI, volume 2)

Zusammenfassung

Die Problematik des Sprachverstehens existiert gleichsam seit biblischen Zeiten. Unser Zeitalter bietet in Form des Computers ein mächtiges Werkzeug zur Lösung vielfältiger Aufgaben. Es erscheint daher naheliegend, den Computer auch zur Bewältigung dieses Problemkreises einzusetzen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Allen J.F.(ed.): Special Issue on Ill-Formed Input (= American Journal of Computational Linguistics 9,3–4; 1983).Google Scholar
  2. Appelt D.E.: Problem Solving Applied to Language Generation, in Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Parasession on Topics in Interactive Discourse, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 59–63; 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates M.: The Theory and Practice of Augmented Transition Network Grammars, in Bolc L. (ed.), Natural Language Communication with Computers, Springer, Berlin; 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Bobrow D.G.: Natural Language Input for a Computer Problem-Solving System, in Minsky M.(ed.), Semantic Information Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 146–226; 1968.Google Scholar
  5. Boguraev B.K.: Automatic Resolution of Linguistic Ambiguities, Univ. of Cambridge, Comp. Laboratory, TR-11; 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Bolc L.: The Design of Interpreters, Compilers, and Editors for Augmented Transition Networks, Springer, Berlin; 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brachman R.J., Smith B.C.: SIGART Newsletter 70; 1980 (Spezialausgabe über Knowledge Representation).Google Scholar
  8. Buchberger E., Steinacker I., Trappl R., Trost H., Leinfellner E.: VIE-LANG - A German Language Understanding System, in Trappl R.(ed.), Cybernetics and Systems Research, North-Holland; 1982.Google Scholar
  9. Bußmann H.: Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft, Kröner, Stuttgart; 1983.Google Scholar
  10. Carbonell J.G.: Metaphor: An Inescapable Phenomenon in Natural-Language Comprehension, in Lehnert W.G., Ringle M.H.(eds.), Strategies for Natural Language Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Hillsdale; 1982.Google Scholar
  11. Charniak E.: Six Topics in Search of a Parser: An Overview of AI Language Reasearch, in Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Univ.British, Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; 1981.Google Scholar
  12. Colby K.M.: Artificial Paranoia: A Computer Simulation of Paranoid Processes, Pergamon Press, New York; 1975. 148 E. BuchbergerGoogle Scholar
  13. Cullingford R.E.: Script Application: Computer Understanding of Newspaper Stories, Yale Univ.; 1978.Google Scholar
  14. Duden Band 10, Bedeutungswörterbuch, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannhein; 1970.Google Scholar
  15. Fass D., Wilks Y.: Preference Semantics, Ill-Formedness, and Metaphor, AJCL 9(3–4)178–187; 1983.Google Scholar
  16. Findler N.(ed.): Associative Networks - Representation and Use of Knowledge by Computers, Academic Press, New York; 1979.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Green B.F.jr., Wolf A.K., Chomsky C., Laughery K.: BASEBALL: An Automatic Question Answerer, in Feigenbaum E.A., Feldman J.(eds.), Computers and Thought, McGraw-Hill, New York, 207–216; 1963.Google Scholar
  18. Haegglund S., Hein U. (eds.): Proceedings of the Workshop on Models of Dialogue: Theory and Application, Linkoeping Univ.; 1981.Google Scholar
  19. Hahn W. von, Hoeppner W., Jameson A., Wahlster W.: The Anatomy of the Natural Language Dialogue Sysytem HAM-RPM, in Bolc L. (ed.), Natural Language Based Computer Systems, Carl Hanser Verlag, München; 1980.Google Scholar
  20. Heiser J.F., Colby K.M., Faught W.S., Parkison R.C.: Can Psychiatrists Distinguish a Computer Simulation of Paranoia from the Real Thing? The Limitations of Turing-Like Tests as Measures of the Adequacy of Simulations, J. of Psychiatric Research 15(3)149–162; 1980.Google Scholar
  21. Hendrix G.G.: LIFER: A Natural Language Interface Facility, in SIGART Newsletter 61(1977)25–26.Google Scholar
  22. Hoeppner W., Marburger H.: Dialogsequenzen mit dem System HAM-ANS: Kommentierte Performanzbeispiele, Universität Hamburg, Forschungsstelle für Informationswissenschaft und Künstliche Intelligenz, Memo ANS-16; 1983.Google Scholar
  23. Kellogg C.: A Natural Language Compiler for On-Line Data Management, AFIPS Conference Proc. 29, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Spartan Books, Washington D.C., 349–356; 1966.Google Scholar
  24. Kobsa A.: Wissensrepräsentation, Bericht der Österreichischen Studiengesellschaft für Kybernetik; 1982.Google Scholar
  25. Kobsa A., Buchberger E., Steinacker I.: Funktion, Inhalt und Aufbau von Partnermodellen in natürlichsprachigen Dialogsystemen, OGAI-Journal 2(2)27–40; 1983.Google Scholar
  26. Lehnert W.G.: The Process of Question Answering, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., New Jersey; 1978.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindsay R.K.: A Program for Parsing Sentences and Making Inferences about Kinship Relations, in Hoggatt A.C., Balderston F.E.(eds.), Symposium on Simulation Models: Methodology and Applications to the Behavioral Sciences, South Western Publishing, Cincinnati, 111–138; 1963.Google Scholar
  28. McKeown K.R.: Paraphrasing Using Given and New Information in a Question-Answer System, in 17th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics–Proceedings, University of California, San Diego, 67–72; 1979.Google Scholar
  29. McKeown K.R.: The Text System for Natural Language Generation: An Overview, in Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguists, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 113–120; 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quillian M.R.: Semantic Memory, in Minsky M.(ed.), Semantic Information Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 227–270; 1968.Google Scholar
  31. Quillian M.R.: The Teachable Language Comprehender: A Simulation Program and the Theory of Language, CACM 12(1969)459–476.Google Scholar
  32. Raphael B.: SIR, A Computer Program for Semantic Information Retrieval, In Minsky M.(ed.), Semantic Information Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 33–145; 1968.Google Scholar
  33. Rieger C.: Conceptual Memory, PhD Thesis, Computer Science Dept., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.; 1974.Google Scholar
  34. Roberts R.B., Goldstein I.P.: The FRL Manual, AI Memo 409, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.; 1977.Google Scholar
  35. Schank R.C.: Conceptual Information Processing, North-Holland, Amsterdam; 1975.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Sidner C.L.: Towards a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English Discourse, MIT, AI-Laboratory, TR-537; 1979.Google Scholar
  37. Simmons R.F., Burger J.F., Long R.E.: An Approach Toward Answering English Questions From Text, in AFIPS Conference Proceedings 29, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Spartan Books, Washington D.C., 357–363; 1966.Google Scholar
  38. Slocum J.(ed.): Special Issues on Machine Translation (Computational Linguistics 11,1 und 2–3; 1985).Google Scholar
  39. Steinacker I., Trost H., Leinfellner E.: Disambiguation in German, in Trappt R.(ed.), Cybernetics and Systems Research, North-Holland; 1982.Google Scholar
  40. Tennant H.: Natural Language Processing, Petrocelli Books, New York; 1981.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson F.B.: English for the Computer, AFIPS. Conference Proc. 29, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Spartan Books, Washington D.C., 349–356; 1966.Google Scholar
  42. Trost H.: Wissensrepräsentation: ein überblick und eine Anwendung im Bereich natürlichsprachiger Systeme, Bericht Nr. 32, Österreichische Studiengesellschaft für Kybernetik, Wien; 1984.Google Scholar
  43. Turing A.M.: Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind LIX(236), 1950; nachgedruckt in: Anderson A.R.(ed.): Minds and Machines, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.; 1964.Google Scholar
  44. Waltz D.L.: The State-of-the-Art in Natural Language Understanding, WP 27, Coordinated Science Lab., Univ. of Illinois; 1981.Google Scholar
  45. Weaver W.: Translation, in Locke W.N., Booth A.D.(eds.), Machine Translation of Languages, Technology Press of MIT and Wiley, New York; 1955, 15–23 (Erstmalig publiziert: 1949 ).Google Scholar
  46. Weizenbaum J.: ELIZA - A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine, CACM 9(1966)36–45.Google Scholar
  47. Wilensky R.: Understanding Goal-Based Stories, Research Rep. 140, Yale University; 1978.Google Scholar
  48. Winograd T.: Understanding Natural Language, Academic Press, New York; 1972.Google Scholar
  49. Winograd T.: Language as a Cognitive Process, 1: Syntax, Addison-Wesley, Reading; 1983.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Woods W.A.: Augmented Transition Networks for Natural Language Analysis, Harvard Computation Laboratory Report No. CS-1, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Mass.; 1969.Google Scholar
  51. Woods W.A., Kaplan R.M., Nash-Webber B.: The Lunar Sciences Natural Language Information System: Final Report, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge, Mass; 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© B. G. Teubner Stuttgart 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernst Buchberger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations