Advertisement

A Review on Integration of Scientific Experimental Data Through Metadata

  • Nur Adila Azram
  • Rodziah AtanEmail author
  • Shuhaimi Mustafa
  • Mohd Nasir Mohd Desa
Chapter
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

Data integration for scientific experiments and research is important to researchers in many research areas like biotechnology, medical, and biomedical research. This is because many experiments and research data are stored in different sources as well as involving multidisciplinary fields which make it difficult to manage and analyze the experimental data. Metadata is one of the common methods used for data integration in many different areas. This paper describes and reviewed metadata as one of the approach for data integration. Other than that, the state of research for integration of scientific experiments and research data based on metadata along with review on latest related work are also covered in this paper.

Keywords

Data integration Metadata Scientific experiment data Scientific research data Metadata-based data integration 

References

  1. 1.
    Ae Chun, S., & MacKeller, B. (2012). Social health data integration using semantic web. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on applied computing (pp. 392–397).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brahaj, A., Razum, M., & Schwichtenberg, F. (2012). Ontological formalization of scientific experiments based on core scientific metadata model. In 16th international conference on theory and practice of digital libraries. LNCS 7489 (pp. 273–279).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ying, Y., & Gengda, J. (2004). Metadata-based information organization and ontology-based knowledge organization. Journal of Academic Libraries, 4, 43–47.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilliland, A. J. Introduction to metadata: Pathways to digital information. Version 2.1, Los Angeles, CA: Getty Information Institute. http://www.getty.edu/research/institute/standards/intrometadata/index.html
  5. 5.
    Birnholtz, J., & Bietz, M. (2003). Data at work: Supporting sharing in science and engineering. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting groupwork (pp. 339–348).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Information Standards Organization, Guenther, R., & Radebaugh, J. (2004). Understanding metadata (PDF). Bethesda, MD: NISO Press (pp. 1–16). ISBN 1-880124-62–69.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001). A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal, 10(4), 334–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, P. W. (2003). Metadata representation and management for context mediation. Working Paper CISL# 200301, May 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chi-Jane, C., Tun-Wen, P., Jhen-Li, H., Ying-Tsang, L., Shih-Syun, L., & Chun-Chao, Y. (2017). Construction of a metadata schema for medical data in networking applications. In 31st international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops (pp. 597–600).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Toralf, K., Alexander, K., Mathias, R., & Jonas W. (2017). Metadata management for data integration in medical sciences. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), 175–194.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ram, S., & Rao, N. L. (2014). Metadata description framework for integration of bioinformatics information resources: A case of iBIRA. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 34(5), 384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chong, Q., Marwadi, A., Supekar, K., & Lee, Y. (2003). Ontology based metadata management in medical domains. Journal of Research Practice in Information Technology, 35(2), 139–154.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, E., Matthews, B., & Wilson, M. (2013). Enhancing the core scientific metadata model to incorporate derived data. Future Generation Computer System, 29(2), 612–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matthews, B., Sufi, S., Flannery, D., Lerusse, L., Griffin, T., Gleaves, M., et al. (2009). Using a core scientific metadata model in large-scale facilities. In 5th international digital curation conference, London, United Kingdom (pp. 106–118).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, F., Liu, P., Pearson, J., Azar, F., & Madlmayr, G. (2006). Experiment management with metadata-based integration for collaborative scientific research. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on data engineering.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W3C XML Query (XQuery). https://www.w3.org/XML/Query/
  17. 17.
    Ferreira, J. D., Pesquita, C., Couto, F. M., & Silva, M. J. (2013). Digital preservation of epidemic resources: Coupling metadata and ontologies. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on preservation of digital objects.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen, Z., Wu, D., Lu, J., & Chen, Y. (2013). Metadata-based information resource integration for research management. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nur Adila Azram
    • 1
  • Rodziah Atan
    • 2
    Email author
  • Shuhaimi Mustafa
    • 3
  • Mohd Nasir Mohd Desa
    • 1
  1. 1.Halal Products Research InstituteUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science and Information TechnologyUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  3. 3.Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular SciencesUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations