Advertisement

CBCT Evaluation of the TMJ

  • Dania Tamimi
  • Elnaz Jalali
Chapter

Abstract

The temporomandibular joint is a complex structure that affects the growth, development, and maintenance of many of the structures of the oral and maxillofacial complex. In order to evaluate this joint and the changes that occur in the rest of the facial skeleton due to its dysfunction and pathology, the appropriate imaging needs to be procured, such as a large field of view cone beam CT scan that includes not only the TMJs but also the entire facial skeleton and upper respiratory tract. This chapter discusses the osseous radiographic anatomy of the TMJ and how different types of pathology change that anatomy and subsequently change the facial skeleton. Many of the TMJ osseous pathologies as they would be viewed on osseous imaging (CBCT or CT) are reviewed and discussed.

Keywords

CBCT (Cone beam CT scan) TMJ Panoramic Degenerative disorders Inflammatory disorders Tumors 

References

  1. 1.
    Quintero JC, Trosien A, Hatcher D, Kapila S. Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics: historical perspective, current status, and future developments. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:491–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Okeson J. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dixon DC. Radiographic diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pharoah MJ, Petrokowski CG. Imaging temporomandibular joint disorders. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin. 2001;13:623–38.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brooks SL, Brand JW, Gibbs SJ, Hollender L, Lurie AG, Omnell KA, et al. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:609–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eckerdal O, Lundberg M. The structural situation in temporomandibular joints. A comparison between conventional oblique transcranial radiographs, tomograms and histologic sections. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1979;8:42–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindvall AM, Helkimo E, Hollender L, Carlsson GE. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint. A comparison between radiographic findings and gross and microscopic morphologic observations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1976;5:24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bean LR, Omnell KA, Oberg T. Comparison between radiologic observations and macroscopic tissue changes in temporomandibular joints. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1977;6:90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(Suppl 1):31–6; discussion 179–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128:803–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:508–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Honda K, Larheim TA, Maruhashi K, Matsumoto K, Iwai K. Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:152–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Honda K, Matumoto K, Kashima M, Takano Y, Kawashima S, Arai Y. Single air contrast arthrography for temporomandibular joint disorder using limited cone beam computed tomography for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:271–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ericson S, Kurol J. Incisor resorption caused by maxillary cuspids. A radiographic study. Angle Orthod. 1987;57:332–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:291–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marmulla R, Wortche R, Muhling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Broadbent B Jr. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod. 1931;1:2–24.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hatcher DC, Aboudara CL. Diagnosis goes digital. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;125:512–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2005;32:282–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:196–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    White S, Pharoah M. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Petrokowski CG. Disorders of the temporomandibular joint. In: Oral radiology-principles and interpretation, white and pharoah. Mosby; 2004. pp. 538–75.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tamimi D, Hatcher D. Specialty imaging: temporomandibular joint. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dania Tamimi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elnaz Jalali
    • 3
  1. 1.Private PracticeOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Comprehensive DentistryUniversity of Texas Health Science CenterSan AntonioUSA
  3. 3.Oral and Maxillofacial RadiologyMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations