In Situ Friction Tests in a Transmission Electron Microscope

  • Fabrice DassenoyEmail author
Part of the Microtechnology and MEMS book series (MEMS)


Post mortem characterization techniques are essential for the understanding of the lubrication mechanisms of complex tribological systems. The information obtained using these techniques can be used to propose hypothesis of mechanisms that have then to be definitively validated by probing the interfacial material in real time during the friction test. To go further in the understanding of the action modes of some tribological systems, it is important to set up an analytical methodology using in situ experimental techniques in order to (i) probe directly the behavior of the interfacial material in the contact zone and (ii) dissociate, for a better understanding, the different components of the tribological stress (pressure and shear). There are several techniques that combine mechanical stress and in situ analysis (Raman tribology, Infra-Red tribology, EXAFS under pressure …). However, the most interesting techniques are certainly those that permit a visualization of the contact area in real time area during the friction test, down to a nanometer scale. The objective of this chapter is to present through some examples the potential of in situ friction tests done inside a transmission electron microscope.


  1. 1.
    J.M. Howe, H. Mori, Z.L. Wang, In situ high-resolution transmission electron microscopy in the study of nanomaterials and properties. MRS Bull. 33(2), 115–121 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.M. Minor, J.W. Morris Jr., E.A. Stach, Quantitative in situ nanoindentation in an electron microscope. App. Phys. Lett. 79, 1625–1627 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.A. Stach, T. Freeman, A.M. Minor, D.K. Owen, J. Cumings, M.A. Wall, T. Chraska, R. Hull, J.W. Morris Jr., A. Zettl, U. Dahmen, Development of a nanoindenter for in situ transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 7, 507–517 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Li, J. Wang, J.Y. Huang, A. Misra, X. Zhang, In situ TEM observations of room temperature dislocation climb at interfaces in nanolayered Al/Nb composites. Scr. Mater. 63, 363–366 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z.L. Wang, P. Poncharal, W.A. de Heer, Measuring physical and mechanical properties of individual carbon nanotubes by in situ TEM. J. Phys. Chem. 61, 1025–1030 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Han, K. Zheng, Y.F. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z.L. Wang, Low-temperature in situ large-strain plasticity of silicon nanowires. Adv. Mater. 19, 2112–2118 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Asthana, K. Momeni, A. Prasad, Y.K. Yap, R.S. Yassar, In situ observation of size scale effects on the mechanical properties of ZnO nanowires. Nanotechnology 22, 265712 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Deneen, W.M. Mook, A.M. Minor, W.W. Gerberich, C.B. Carter, In situ deformation of silicon nanospheres. J. Mater. Sci. 41, 4477–4483 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z.W. Shan, G. Adesso, A. Cabot, M.P. Sherburne, S.A. Syed Asif, O.L. Warren, D.C. Chrzan, A.M. Minor, A.P. Alivisatos, Ultrahigh stress and strain in hierarchically structured hollow nanoparticles. Nat. Mat. 7, 947–952 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.J. Lockwood, B.J. Inkson, In situ TEM nanoindentation and deformation of Si nanoparticle clusters. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42, 035410 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.E. Carlton, P.J. Ferreira, In situ TEM nanoindentation of nanoparticles. Micron 43, 1134–1139 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Lahouij, F. Dassenoy, L. De Knoop, J.M. Martin, B. Vacher, In situ TEM observation of the behavior of an individual fullerene-like MoS2 nanoparticle in a dynamic contact. Tribol. Lett. 42, 133–140 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. Lahouij, F. Dassenoy, B. Vacher, J.M. Martin, Real time imaging of compression and shear of single fullerene-like MoS2 nanoparticle. Tribol. Lett. 45, 131–141 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. Lahouij, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, France (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. Lahouij, B. Vacher, J.M. Martin, F. Dassenoy, IF-MoS2 based lubricants: influence of size, shape and crystal structure. Wear 296, 558–567 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. Lahouij, B. Vacher, F. Dassenoy, Direct observation by in situ TEM of the behavior of IF-MoS2 nanoparticles during sliding tests. Lubr. Sci. 36(3), 163–173 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    I. Jenei, F. Dassenoy, Friction coefficient measured on a single WS2 nanoparticle: an in situ transmission electron microscope experiment. Tribol. Lett. 65, 86 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des SystèmesCNRS, UMR 5512, Ecole Centrale de LyonEcullyFrance

Personalised recommendations