Advertisement

Reframing Coordination in Knowledge Transfer: A Sociomaterial Perspective

  • Néstor A. NovaEmail author
  • Rafael A. GonzálezEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 914)

Abstract

Coordination issues in knowledge transfer have become increasingly complex due to technological diversity. A classic view on coordination, based on structured and shared cognitive models, is being replaced by an understanding of how coordination actually happens in practice, in a context-dependent and non-routine way. This paper presents a sociomaterial perspective of both knowledge transfer and coordination. Specifically, through a case study in the heritage domain, we investigated how a sociomaterial perspective drives coordination in inter-organizational knowledge transfer activities. Using an affordance-centered analysis, we explore how the process of imbrication has resulted in ontological transformations in sociomaterial heritage co-evolving with dynamic and emergent coordination practices of the associated knowledge transfer.

Keywords

Coordination Knowledge transfer Sociomateriality Affordances Imbrication 

References

  1. 1.
    Nova, N.A., Gonzalez, R.A.: Coordination problems in knowledge transfer: a case study of inter-organizational projects. In: 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing November 23 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Galbraith, J.R.: Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces 4, 28–36 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    March, J.G., Simon, H.A.: Organizations. Wiley Organizations, Oxford (1958)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson, J.D.: Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway (1967)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Constantinides, P., Barrett, M.: A narrative networks approach to understanding coordination practices in emergency response. Inf. Organ. 22, 273–294 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jarzabkowski, P.A., Lê, J.K., Feldman, M.S.: Toward a theory of coordinating: creating coordinating mechanisms in practice. Organ. Sci. 23, 907–927 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Okhuysen, G.A., Bechky, B.A.: 10 coordination in organizations: an integrative perspective. Acad. Manag. Ann. 3, 463–502 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D.: To transfer is to transform: the circulation of safety knowledge. Organization 7, 329–348 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faraj, S., Xiao, Y.: Coordination in fast-response organizations. Manag. Sci. 52, 1155–1169 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leonardi, P.M.: When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Q. 35, 147–168 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leonardi, P.M.: Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Inf. Organ. 23, 59–76 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28, 1435–1448 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Scott, S.V.: Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology work and organization. Ann. Acad. Manag. 2, 433–474 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zorina, A.P., Avison, D.: When environment matters: inter-organizational effects on sociomaterial imbrications and change (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surv. CSUR. 26, 87–119 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? In: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 357–370. ACM, New York, NY, USA (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cabitza, F., Simone, C.: Affording mechanisms: an integrated view of coordination and knowledge management. Comput. Support. Coop. Work CSCW 21, 227–260 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L., Koenig Jr., R.: Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 41, 322–338 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Argote, L.: Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Adm. Sci. Q. 27, 420–434 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grant, R.M.: Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 17, 109–122 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crowston, K.: A taxonomy of organizational dependencies and coordination mechanisms. In: Organizing Business Knowledge: The Mit Process Handbook. Center for Coordination Science, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1994)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reger, G.: How R&D is coordinated in Japanese and European multinationals. RD Manag. 29, 71–88 (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malone, T.W., et al.: Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes. Manag. Sci. 45, 425–443 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gonzalez, R.A.: Coordination and its ICT support in crisis response: confronting the information-processing view of coordination with a case study. In: 41st International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Xplore (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adler, P.S.: Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: the case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. 6, 147–167 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Simonin, B.L.: Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 20, 595–623 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cummings, J.N., Kiesler, S.: Who collaborates successfully? Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 437–446. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Contractor, N., Monge, P., Leonardi, P.M.: Network theory multidimensional networks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: bringing technology inside the network. Int. J. Commun. 5, 682–720 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bailey, D.E., Leonardi, P.M., Chong, J.: Minding the gaps: understanding technology interdependence and coordination in knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 21, 713–730 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5, 121–147 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bechky, B.A.: Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14, 312–330 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Leonardi, P.M.: Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: what do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them? In: Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, pp.25–48 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11, 404–428 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., Marton, A.: The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Q. 37, 357–370 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ktistakis, G., Akoumianakis, D.: Digital calendars for flexible organizational routines. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 30, 476–502 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Leonardi, P.M., Barley, S.R.: Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Inf. Organ. 18, 159–176 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Camb. J. Econ. 34, 125–141 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Callon, M.: Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Sociol. Rev. 32, 196–233 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. OUP, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Law, J.: Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of Portuguese expansion. Soc. Constr. Technol. Syst. New Dir. Sociol. Hist. Technol. 1, 1–134 (1987)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Suchman, L.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Faraj, S., Azad, B.: The materiality of technology: an affordance perspective. In: Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, pp. 237–258 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G.C., Azad, B.: The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19, 38–55 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Markus, M.L., Silver, M.: A foundation for the study of IT effects: a new look at desanctis and poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9, 609–632 (2008)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zammuto, R.F., Griffith, T.L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D.J., Faraj, S.: Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18, 749–762 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Treem, J.W., Leonardi, P.M.: Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. SSRN Electron. J. 36, 143–189 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systems EngineeringPontificia Universidad JaverianaBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations