Advertisement

Knowledge Management in Enterprise Architecture Projects

  • Juan Pablo Meneses-OrtegónEmail author
  • Rafael A. GonzalezEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 914)

Abstract

In the domain of enterprise architecture (EA), project and team complexity can be a challenge as well as an opportunity for knowledge management (KM). EA projects generate a series of artifacts that contain knowledge directly or indirectly which can be reused or transferred from project to project. In this paper, the interest in providing a KM framework for TOGAF-based EA, to capture, store and reuse lessons learned in the first phases of the project. The framework is described in a meta-model known as “ways of”, addressing the ways of thinking, working, supporting, controlling and modeling. Validation is presented through a case study in a consulting company and through expert opinion.

Keywords

Knowledge management Enterprise architecture TOGAF Preliminary Architecture vision 

References

  1. 1.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29651-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arango Serna, M.D., Londoño Salazar, J.E., Zapata Cortés, J.A.: Arquitectura empresarial - una visión general Rev. Ing. Univ. Medel. 9(16), 101–111 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Struck, V., Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: Enterprise architecture management from a knowledge management perspective-results from an empirical study. In: MCIS, p. 84 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Open Group: TOGAF Version 9. The Open Group (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ernst, A.M.: Enterprise architecture management patterns. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, New York, NY, USA, pp. 7:1–7:20 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meneses-Ortegon, J.P., Gonzalez, R.A.: Knowledge management framework for early phases in TOGAF-based enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge, Discovery, Knowledge, Engineering and Knowledge Management, KMIS, vol. 3, pp. 31–40 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Filemon, A., Uriarte, J.R.: Introduction to Knowledge Management, Supported by National Academy of Science and Technoogy. ASEAN Foundation (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yew Wong, K., Aspinwall, E.: An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector. J. Knowl. Manag. 9(3), 64–82 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q. 25(1), 107 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baskerville, R., Dulipovici, A.: The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 4(2), 83–105 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pandey, K.N.: Paradigms of Knowledge Management: With Systems Modelling Case Studies. Springer, Berlin (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2785-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dalkir, K.: Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Routledge, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Allameh, S.M., Zare, S.M., Mohammad Reza Davoodi, S.: Examining the impact of KM enablers on knowledge management processes. Procedia Comput. Sci. 3, 1211–1223 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubenstein-Montano, B., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B., Rebeck, K.: A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decis. Support Syst. 31(1), 5–16 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wegmann, P.A.: On the systemic enterprise architecture methodology (SEAM, in SEAM). Published at the International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems 2003 (ICEIS 2003), pp. 483–490 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Open Group: TOGAF® Version 9.1, an Open Group Standard (2011). http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/
  17. 17.
    Mezzanotte, D.M.: Planning enterprise architecture: creating organizational knowledge using the theory of structuration to build information technology. 2016 IEEE ACIS 14th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA), pp. 107–115 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mihi-Ramirez, A., Garcia Morales, V.J., Marti Rojas, R.: Knowledge creation, organizational learning and their effects on organizational performance. Inzinerine Ekon.-Eng. Econ. 22(3), 309–318 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moscoso-Zea, O., Lujan-Mora, S., Esquetini Caceres, C., Schweimanns, N.: Knowledge management framework using enterprise architecture and business intelligence. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS, pp. 244–249 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: Future research topics in enterprise architecture management – a knowledge management perspective. In: Dan, A., Gittler, F., Toumani, F. (eds.) ICSOC/ServiceWave - 2009. LNCS, vol. 6275, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16132-2_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Del Nostro, P., Orciuoli, F., Paolozzi, S., Ritrovato, P., Toti, D.: ARISTOTELE: A Semantic-Driven Platform for Enterprise Management. IEEE, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moscoso-Zea, O., Andres-Sampedro, Lujan-Mora, S.: Datawarehouse design for educational data mining. In: 2016 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET). IEEE, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Migdadi, M.: Knowledge management enablers and outcomes in the small-and-medium sized enterprises. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 109(6), 840–858 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tu, F., Yang, C., Xiao, H., Yang, D.: A study on typical architecture layers of the digital library alliance based on the enterprise architecture, pp. 142–145 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fiedler, M., Hauder, M., Schneider, A.W.: Foundations for the integration of enterprise wikis and specialized tools for enterprise architecture management. Presented at the Wirtschaftsinformatik, p. 109 (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anajafi, F., Nassiri, R., Shabgahi, G.L.: Developing effective project management for enterprise architecture projects. In: 2010 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE), vol. 1, pp. V1-388–V1-393 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: Future research topics in enterprise architecture management - a knowledge management perspective. In: Dan, A., Gittler, F., Toumani, F. (eds.) ICSOC/ServiceWave - 2009. LNCS, vol. 6275, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16132-2_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Indra. http://www.indracompany.com/. Accessed 03 Dec 2014
  30. 30.
    Opt’Land, M., Proper, E., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C.: The results of enterprise architecting. In: Opt’Land, M., Proper, E., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C. (eds.) Enterprise Architecture, pp. 49–83. Springer, Berlin (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85232-2_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rus, I., Lindvall, M.: Guest editors’ introduction: knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE Softw. 19(3), 26–38 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fairchild, A.M.: Knowledge management metrics via a balanced scorecard methodology. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, HICSS, pp. 3173–3180 (2002)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Golder, S.A., Huberman, B.A.: Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Inf. Sci. 32(2), 198–208 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Monteiro, L.B., Weigang, L., Saleh, A.A.: An approach of vector space model to link concrete concepts with Wiki entities. Presented at the Proceedings—15th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, CIT 2015, 14th IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications, IUCC 2015, 13th IEEE International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, DASC 2015 and 13th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, PICom 2015, pp. 313–320 (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Amazon: Amazon Products Visualization - YASIV (2012). http://www.yasiv.com/. Accessed 24 May 2016
  36. 36.
    University of Massachusetts Lowell: Weave (Web-based Analysis and Visualization Environment) (2015). http://www.oicweave.org/. Accessed: 14 June 2016
  37. 37.
    Gephi: The Open Graph Viz Platform (2010). https://gephi.org/. Accessed 14 June 2016
  38. 38.
    Microsoft: NodeXL® Network Overview, Discovery and Exploration for Excel, CodePlex (2015). http://nodexl.codeplex.com/Wikipage?ProjectName=nodexl. Accessed 14 June 2016
  39. 39.
    Bostock, M.: D3.js - Data-Driven Documents (2015). https://d3js.org/. Accessed 14 June 2016
  40. 40.
    Knoco: Lessons Learned Services—Knoco Ltd. (2014). http://www.knoco.com/lessons-learned-introduction.htm. Accessed 14 June 2016
  41. 41.
    Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., López-Cima, A.: Building legal ontologies with METHONTOLOGY and WebODE. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 142–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Ontological engineering: principles, methods, tools and languages. In: Ontologies for Software Engineering and Software Technology, pp. 1–48 (2006)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering with Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web (2004)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maier, R.: Knowledge Management Systems: Information and Communication Technologies for Knowledge Management. Springer, Berlin (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71408-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    González R.A., Sol, H.G.: Validation and design science research in information systems, pp. 403–426 (2012)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Varela, L.A.Y., Tovar, L.A.R., Chaparro, J.: Modelo de aceptación tecnológica (TAM): un estudio de la inf luencia de la cultura nacional y del perfil del usuario en el uso de las TIC, 2010, pp. 187–204 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontificia Universidad JaverianaBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations