Do ICTs Matter for Italy?

  • Daniela CialfiEmail author
  • Emiliano Colantonio
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 805)


Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) impact the communities in which we live and the way individuals, business, government and civil society interact and develop. Simultaneously, all sectors have shown increased interest in the concept of social capital and the role it could play in building stronger communities, increasing economic productivity and contributing to regional rejuvenation. Thus, ICTs and social capital concept interlink with each other in a variety of ways. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between ICTs and social capital through the study of the relative’s disparities among Italian regions. This paper provides an operational definition of the concepts of ICT and social capital and presents consistent evidence on the geography of this relationship in Italy. The statistical and geographical analysis, based on non-linear clustering with self-organizing map (SOM) neural networks, are performed to analyse the performance of Italian regions in the period 2006–2013. The results show the isolation of Southern Italian regions. In particular, we found that ICTs may not promote social capital, that is, ICTs could not play a decisive role in creating and developing social capital. These results prompt the formulation of new policies for Italian regions.


ICT Neural networks Regional performance 


  1. 1.
    Ahmed, Z., Alzahrani, A.: Social capital and ICT intervention: a search for contextual relation. In: Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 2000–2016, 5–10 June 2017. ISBN 978-989-20-7655-3
  2. 2.
    Andriani, L., Karyampas, D.: A new proxy of Social Capital and the Economic Performance across the Italian regions. Econ. and Fin., Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics, University of London (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benkler, Y.: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Degli Antoni, G.: Capitale sociale e crescita economica: verifica empirica a livello regionale e provinciale. J. Italian Econ. Ass. 3, 363–394 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gaved, M., Anderson, B.: The impact of local ICT initiatives on social capital and quality of life. Chimera Working Paper Number 2006-06 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rainie, L., Horrigan, J.B., Wellman, B., Boase, J.: The Strength of Internet Ties. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Putnam, R.D.: Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J. Democr. 1(1), 65–78 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skupin, A., Agarwal, P.: Introduction: what is a self-organizing map?. In: Agarwal, P., Skupin, A. (eds.) Self-Organizing Maps: Applications in Geographic Information Science, pp. 1–20. Wiley, Chichester (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zimbauer, D.: What can Social Capital and ICT do for Inclusion? Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, European Commission (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophical, Pedagogical and Economic-Quantitative SciencesUniversity G.D’Annunzio Chieti-PescaraPescaraItaly

Personalised recommendations