Advertisement

Constructed Wetlands Case Studies for the Treatment of Water Polluted with Fuel and Oil Hydrocarbons

  • Alexandros I. StefanakisEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The green technology of constructed wetlands is considered a sustainable option for wastewater treatment worldwide. While such systems have been extensively applied for domestic and municipal wastewaters across the world, the challenge today is the effective application of wetland designs for the various industrial wastewaters. Among them, the petrochemical industry and the oil and gas sector appear as the most challenging fields due to the complex composition and the pollutant variety, mainly the various hydrocarbon compounds, such as fuel additives (MTBE), gasoline contaminants (BTEX), phenolics, and oil hydrocarbons produced during oil extraction. This chapter presents an overview of two characteristic international case studies from different parts of the world, where both research and full-scale implementation of innovative constructed wetland designs have been adopted to provide a sustainable solution to pressing and extensive environmental contamination.

Keywords

Natural treatment systems Constructed wetlands Industrial wastewater Fuel hydrocarbons Benzene MTBE Phenols Fuel additives Oil and gas 

References

  1. 1.
    Jain P, Sharma M, Dureja P, Sarma PM, Lal B (2017) Bioelectrochemical approaches for removal of sulfate, hydrocarbon and salinity from produced water. Chemosphere 166:96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stefanakis AI, Seeger E, Dorer C, Sinke A, Thullner M (2016) Performance of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating groundwater contaminated with phenols and petroleum derivatives. Ecol Eng 95:514–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Langwaldt JH, Puhakka JA (2000) On-site biological remediation of contaminated groundwater: a review. Environ Pollut 107:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levchuk I, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2014) Overview of technologies for removal of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) from water. Sci Total Environ 476–477:415–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stefanakis, A.I., Akratos, C.S,, Tsihrintzis, V.A., 2014. Vertical flow constructed wetlands: eco-engineering systems for wastewater and sludge treatment. 1st ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu Y, Lerner DN, Banwart SA, Thornton SF, Pickup RW (2006) Persistence of fermentative process to phenolic toxicity in groundwater. J Environ Qual 35:2021–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    USEPA (2015) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). http://www.epa.gov/iris
  9. 9.
    Costa CR, Botta CMR, Espindola ELG, Olivi P (2008) Electrochemical treatment of tannery wastewater using DSA® electrodes. J Hazard Mater 153(1–2):616–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tatoulis T, Stefanakis AI, Frontistis Z, Akratos CS, Tekerlekopoulou AG, Mantzavinos D, Vayenas DV (2016) Treatment of table olive washing water using trickling filters, constructed wetlands and electrooxidation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(2):1085–1092.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7058-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abira MA, Van Bruggen JJA, Denny P (2005) Potential of a tropical subsurface constructed wetland to remove phenol from pre-treated pulp and papermill wastewater. Water Sci Technol 51(9):173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stottmeister U, Kuschk P, Wiessner A (2010) Full-scale bioremediation and long-term monitoring of a phenolic wastewater disposal lake. Pure Appl Chem 82:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn. WHO, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hagström EL, Lyles C, Pattanayek M, De Shields B, Berkman MP (2016) Produced water—emerging challenges, risks, and opportunities. Environ Claims J 28(2):122–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stefanakis AI, Al-Hadrami A, Prigent S (2017) Treatment of produced water from oilfield in a large Constructed Wetland: 6 years of operation under desert conditions. In: Proceedings, 7th International Symposium for Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control (WETPOL), Montana, USA, 21–25 AugGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim KH, Jahan SA, Kabir E, Brown RJ (2013) A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environ Int 60:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arthur J, Langhus B, Patel C (2005) Technical summary of oil & gas produced water treatment technologies. Tulsa, Oklahoma, pp 1–53Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deeb RA, Chu K-H, Shih T, Linder S, Suffet I, Kavanaugh MC (2003) MTBE and other oxygenates: environmental sources, analysis, occurrence, and treatment. Environ Eng Sci 20(5):433–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stefanakis AI, Thullner M (2016) Fate of phenolic compounds in Constructed Wetlands treating contaminated water. In: Ansari AA et al (eds) Phytoremediation. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 311–325Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fakhru’l-Razi A, Pendashteh A, Abdullah LC, Biak DRA, Madaeni SS, Abidin ZZ (2009) Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials 170 (2-3):530–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Igunnu ET, Chen GZ3 (2013) Produced water treatment technologies. Int J Low Carbon Tech. 9:157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vlasopoulos N, Memon FA, Butler D, Murphy R (2006) Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment technologies treating petroleum process waters. Sci Total Environ 367(1):58–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stefanakis AI (2016) Constructed Wetlands: description and benefits of an eco-tech water treatment system. In: McKeown E, Bugyi G (eds) Impact of water pollution on human health and environmental sustainability. Information Science Reference (IGI Global), Hershey, PA, pp 281–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu S, Wallace S, Brix H, Kuschk P, Kirui WK, Masi F, Dong R (2015) Treatment of industrial effluents in constructed wetlands: challenges, operational strategies and overall performance. Environ Pollut 201:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stefanakis AI, Tsihrintzis VA (2012) Effects of loading, resting period, temperature, porous media, vegetation and aeration on performance of pilot-scale Vertical Flow Constructed Wetlands. Chem Eng 181–182:416–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Imfeld G, Braeckevelt M, Kuschk P, Richnow HH (2009) Monitoring and assessing processes of organic chemicals removal in constructed wetlands. Chemosphere 74:349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stefanakis AI, Prigent S, Breuer R (2018) Integrated produced water management in a desert oilfield using wetland technology and innovative reuse practices. In: Stefanakis AI (ed) Constructed Wetlands for industrial wastewater treatment. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tatoulis T, Akratos CS, Tekerlekopoulou AG, Vayenas DV, Stefanakis AI (2017) A novel horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland: reducing area requirements and clogging risk. Chemosphere 186:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ballesteros F Jr, Vuong TH, Secondes MF, Tuan PD (2016) Removal efficiencies of constructed wetland and efficacy of plant on treating benzene. Sustain Environ Res 26:93–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eke PE, Scholz M (2008) Benzene removal with vertical-flow constructed treatment wetlands. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 83:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ranieri E, Gorgoglione A, Montanaro C, Iacovelli A, Gikas P (2014) Removal capacity of BTEX and metals of constructed wetlands under the influence of hydraulic conductivity. Desalin Water Treat.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.951963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schultze-Nobre L, Wiessner A, Bartsch C, Paschke H, Stefanakis AI, Aylward LA, Kuschk P (2017) Removal of dimethylphenols and ammonium in laboratory-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Eng Life Sci 17(12):1224–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Breuer R, Grissemann E (2011) Produced water treatment using wetlands - reducing the environmental impact of oilfield operations. Soc Petrol Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.2118/140124-MS
  34. 34.
    Breuer R, Headley TR, Thaker YI (2012) The first year’s operation of the Nimr Water Treatment Plant in Oman-Sustainable produced water management using wetlands. Soc Petrol Eng.  https://doi.org/10.2118/156427-MS
  35. 35.
    Ji GD, Sun TH, Ni JR (2007) Surface flow constructed wetland for heavy oil-produced water treatment. Bioresour Technol 98:436–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Knight RL, Robert H, Kadlec H, Ohlendorf M (1999) The use of treatment wetlands for petroleum industry effluents. Environ Sci Technol 33(7):973–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wallace S, Schmidt M, Larson E (2011) Long term hydrocarbon removal using treatment wetlands. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, 30 Oct–2 NovGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martienssen M, Fabritius H, Kukla S, Balcke GU, Hasselwander E, Schirmer M (2006) Determination of naturally occurring MTBE biodegradation by analyzing metabolites and biodegradation by-products. J Contam Hydrol 87:37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    UBA (2003) Inventarisierung von Grundwasserschäden und deren Beurteilung in Großprojekten “Ökologische Altlasten” der neuen Bundesländer. Umweltbundesamt. Bearbeiter GICON Großmann Ingenieur Consult GmbH, AuftraggeberGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rügner H, Henzler R, Bittens M, Weiß H, Leven C, Bayer P, Finkel M (2007) SAFIRA II – Revitalisierungskonzepte für großskalige Boden- und Grundwasserverunreinigungen. Altlasten Spektrum 1:7–12Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen Z, Kuschk P, Reiche N, Borsdorf H, Kaestner M, Koeser H (2012) Comparative evaluation of pilot scale horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands and plant root mats for treating groundwater contaminated with benzene and MTBE. J Hazard Mater 209–210:510–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Seeger E, Kuschk P, Fazekas H, Grathwohl P, Kaestner M (2011a) Bioremediation of benzene-, MTBE- and ammonia-contaminated groundwater with pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Environ Pollut 159:3769–3776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Seeger E, Reiche N, Kuschk P, Borsdorf H, Kaestner M (2011b) Performance evaluation using a three compartment mass balance for the removal of volatile organic compounds in pilot scale Constructed Wetlands. Environ Sci Technol 45:8467–8474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Seeger EM, Maier U, Grathwohl P, Kuschk P, Kaestner M (2013) Performance evaluation of different horizontal subsurface flow wetland types by characterization of flow behavior, mass removal and depth-dependent contaminant load. Water Res 47(2):769–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    De Biase C, Reger D, Schmidt A, Jechalke S, Reiche N, Martinez-Lavanchy PM, Rosell M, Van Afferden M, Maier U, Oswald SE, Thullner M (2011) Treatment of volatile organic contaminants in a vertical flow filter: relevance of different removal processes. Ecol Eng 37:1292–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van Afferden M, Rahman KZ, Mosig P, De Biase C, Thullner M, Oswald SE, Mueller RA (2011) Remediation of groundwater contaminated with MTBE and benzene: the potential of vertical-flow soil filter systems. Water Res 45:5063–5074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    De Biase C, Maier U, Baeder-Bederski O, Bayer P, Oswald SE, Thullner M (2012) Removal of volatile organic compounds in Vertical Flow Filters: predictions from reactive transport modeling. Ground Water Monit Remed 32(2):106–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mleczek M, Rutkowski P, Rissmann I, Kaczmarek Z, Golinski P, Szentner K, Strazynska K, Stachowiak A (2010) Biomass productivity and phytoremediation potential of Salix alba and Salix viminalis. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1410–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rentz JA, Alvarez PJJ, Schnoor JL (2005) Benzo[a]pyrene cometabolism in the presence of plant root extracts and exudates: implications for phytoremediation. Environ Pollut 136:477–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang X, Deshusses MA (2007) Biotreatment of groundwater contaminated with MTBE: interaction of common environmental co-contaminants. Biodegradation 18:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Thullner M, Stefanakis AI, Dehestabi S (2018) Constructed Wetlands treating water contaminated with organic hydrocarbons. In: Stefanakis, A.I. (ed.), Constructed Wetlands for industrial wastewater treatment. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Abed RMM, Al-Kharusi S, Prigent S, Headley T (2014) Diversity, distribution and hydrocarbon biodegradation capabilities of microbial communities in oil-contaminated cyanobacterial mats from a constructed wetland. PLoS One 9(12):e114570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Prigent S, Al-Hadrami A, Headley T, Al-Harrasi W, Stefanakis AI 2016 The reuse of Wetland-treated oilfield produced water for saline irrigation. International Conference of the International Desalination Association (IDA) on water reuse and recycling, Nice, France, 25–27 SeptGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stefanakis AI, Al-Hadrami A, Prigent S (2017) Reuse of oilfield produced water treated in a Constructed Wetland for saline irrigation under desert climate. In: 7th International Symposium on Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control (WETPOL), Montana, USA, 21–25 AugGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nikolaou I, Stefanakis AI (2018) A novel response of industry to wastewater treatment with constructed wetlands: a managerial view through system dynamic techniques. In: Stefanakis AI (ed) Constructed Wetlands for industrial wastewater treatment. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bauer Resources GmbHSchrobenhausenGermany
  2. 2.Bauer Nimr LLCMuscatSultanate of Oman
  3. 3.Department of EngineeringGerman University of Technology in Oman (GUtech)HalbanSultanate of Oman

Personalised recommendations