Advertisement

Rendre réel aux yeux du public”: Stage Craft, Film Tricks, and the Féerie

  • Frank KesslerEmail author
  • Sabine Lenk
Chapter
Part of the Avant-Gardes in Performance book series (AGP)

Abstract

In this chapter, Kessler and Lenk provide a study on the role of tricks and effects for the French stage and film genre of féerie, which flourished throughout the nineteenth century and in the first decade of the twentieth century. Using the concept of dispositif as their theoretical framework, they offer an analysis of the féerie genre’s general characteristics. In a following step, they discuss the theoretical status of stage craft and tricks and the way in which they function as a central element of the genre. In the final part of the chapter, Kessler and Lenk present two examples, one from a stage féerie and one from a film, to illustrate the productivity of their media archaeological perspective.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1895. Poetics. Trans. S. H. Butcher. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Bernheim, Adrien. 1909. La féerie se meurt. Touche à tout 9: 357–360.Google Scholar
  3. De Banville, Théodore. 1866. Les Parisiennes de Paris. Paris: Michel Lévy Frères.Google Scholar
  4. Floury, Edmond. 1906a. La Cuisine théâtrale. La Revue théâtrale (Nouvelle Série) 54: 1387–1388.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1906b. La Cuisine théâtrale (Suite). La Revue théâtrale (Nouvelle Série) 59: 1517–1519.Google Scholar
  6. Ginisty, Paul. s. d. [1910]. La Féerie. Paris: Louis Michaud.Google Scholar
  7. Kessler, Frank. 2010. Méliès/Metz: comment penser le trucage? In Dall’inizio, alla fine/In the Beginning, at the Very End, ed. Francesco Casetti et al., 167–172. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2012. The Féerie Between Stage and Screen. In A Companion to Early Cinema, ed. André Gaudreault, Nicolas Dulac, and Santiago Hidalgo, 64–79. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2013. La féerie: un spectacle paradoxal. Lendemains 152: 71–80.Google Scholar
  10. Méliès, Georges. 1907. Kinematographic Views. In André Gaudreault, Film and Attraction. From Kinematography to Cinema, 133–152. Urbana/Chicago/Springfield: University of Illinois Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1932. L’importance du scénario. Cinéa et Ciné pour tous réunis 24: 23–25.Google Scholar
  12. Metz, Christian. 1977. ‘Trucage’ and the Film. Critical Inquiry 3 (4): 657–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moynet, J. 1888. L’Envers du théâtre. Machines et décorations. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  14. Odin, Roger. 2000. De la fiction. Brussels: DeBoeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2011. Les Espaces de communication. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
  16. Pougin, Arthur. 1885. Dictionnaire historique et pittoresque du théâtre et des arts qui s’y rattachent. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
  17. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1975. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Zola, Émile. 1881. Le Naturalisme au théâtre. Paris: G. Charpentier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.Free University of Brussels (ULB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations