Advertisement

Media-Archaeological Approaches to Theatre and Performance: An Introduction

  • Nele WynantsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Avant-Gardes in Performance book series (AGP)

Abstract

This introductory chapter maps the ground where media archaeology and theatre studies meet. As an age-old art form, theatre has always embraced “new” media. Literally “a place to observe”, the theatron has been a favoured platform for trying new technologies and scientific objects, including mirrors, electric light, the magic lantern, the théâtrophone, and, more recently, cameras, digital projection devices, and mobile media. Combining approaches and perspectives from both fields, Wynants develops a conceptual frame to unearth previously neglected examples of intermediality. She focuses on the vital relationship between researchers and artists, the particular concern with presence and performativity, and the pivotal role in this context of the archive as a source of discovery and creativity. She urges us to reread contemporary intermedial performance through the looking glass of media-archaeology in order to excavate alternative or forgotten theatre histories.

References

  1. Auslander, Philip. 1999. Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Balme, Christopher. 1997. Interpreting the Pictorial Record. Theatre Iconography and the Referential Dilemma. Theatre Research International 22 (3): 190–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bay-Cheng, Sarah, et al., eds. 2010. Mapping Intermediality in Performance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boenisch, Peter. 2006. Aesthetic Art to Aesthetic Act. Theatre, Media, Intermedial Performance. In Intermediality in Theatre and Performance, ed. Freda Chapple and Chiel Kattenbel, 103–116. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  5. de Kerckhove, Derrick. 1982. Theatre as Information-Processing in Western Cultures. Modern Drama 25 (1): 143–153.  https://doi.org/10.1353/mdr.1982.0000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Laet, Timmy. 2013. Bodies with(out) Memories: Strategies of Re-enactment in Contemporary Dance. In Performing Memory in Art and Popular Culture, ed. Liedeke Plate, 135–152. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Dixon, Steve. 2007. Digital Performance: A History of New Media in Theater, Dance, Performance Art, and Installation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elsaesser, Thomas. 2006. Early Film History and Multi-Media: An Archaeology of Possible Futures? In New Media, Old Media: A History and Theory Reader, ed. W.H.K. Chun and T. Keenan, 13–26. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2016. Film History as Media Archaeology. Tracking Digital Cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. 1989. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. Tavistock. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giannachi, Gabriella. 2004. Virtual Theatres: An Introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gitelman, Lisa. 2008. Always Already New. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goddard, Michael. 2014. Opening Up the Black Boxes: Media Archaeology, ‘Anarchaeology’ and Media Materiality. New Media and Society 17 (11): 1761–1776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grau, Oliver. 2003. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. Trans. Gloria Custance. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2004. Production of Presence. What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Huhtamo, Erkki. 1996. Time Machines in the Gallery. An Archeological Approach in Media Art. In Immersed in Technology. Art and Virtual Environments, ed. Mary Anne Moser and Douglas McLeod, 232–268. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2011. Dismantling the Fairy Engine: Media Archaeology as Topos Study. In Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications, ed. Erkki Huhtamo and Jussi Parikka, 27–47. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2013. Illusions in Motion. Media Archaeology of the Moving Panorama and Related Spectacles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Huhtamo, Erkki, and Jussi Parikka, eds. 2011. Media Archaeology. Approaches, Applications, and Implications. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kattenbelt, Chiel, and Freda Chapple, eds. 2006. Intermediality in Theatre and Performance. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  21. Kessler, Frank. 2006. The Cinema of Attractions as Dispositif. In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, ed. Wanda Strauven, 57–70. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kluitenberg, Eric, ed. 2006. The Book of Imaginary Media: Excavating the Dream of the Ultimate Communication Medium. Amsterdam: NAi Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2011. On the Archaeology of Imaginary Media. In Media Archaeology. Approaches, Applications, and Implications, ed. Erkki Huhtamo and Jussi Parikka, 48–69. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lepecki, André. 2010. The Body as Archive. Will to Re-Enact and the Afterlives of Dances. Dance Research Journal 42 (2): 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pearson, Mike, and Michael Shanks. 2001. Theatre/Archaeology: Disciplinary Dialogues. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Phelan, Peggy. 1993. Unmarked. The Politics of Performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Reilly, Kara, ed. 2013. Theatre, Performance and Analogue Technology. Historical Interfaces and Intermedialities. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Schneider, Rebecca. 2001. Performance Remains. Performance Research 6 (2): 100–108.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2001.10871792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2014. Theatre & History. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shanks, Michael, Nick Kaye, and Gabriella Giannachi. 2012. Archaeologies of Presence. Art, Performance and the Persistence of Being. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Sobchak, Vivian. 2011. Afterword: Media Archaeology and Re-presencing the Past. In Media Archaeology, ed. Erkki Huhtamo and Jussi Parikka, 323–334. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Strauven, Wanda. 2013. Media Archaeology: Where Film Studies, Media Art and New Media (Can) Meet. In Preserving and Exhibiting Media Art: Challenges and Perspectives, ed. Julia Noordegraaf et al., 59–79. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vanhoutte, Kurt, and Charlotte Bigg. 2014. On the Border Between Performance, Science and the Digital: The Embodied Orrery. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 10 (2): 255–260.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2014.946291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wynants, Nele. 2017. Spectral Illusions. Ghostly Presence in Phantasmagoria Shows. In Framing Immersive Theatre and Performance. The Politics and Pragmatics of Participatory Performance, ed. James Frieze, 207–220. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Zielinski, Siegfried. 1999 [1989]. Audiovisions: Cinema and Television as Entr’actes in History. Trans. Gloria Custance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2006. Deep Time of the Media: Toward an Archaeology of Hearing and Seeing by Technical Means. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Free University of Brussels (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations