Advertisement

Regional Patterns of Economic Development: A Typology of French Departments During the Industrialization

  • Faustine PerrinEmail author
  • Mickaël BenaimEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Economic History book series (SEH)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to describe and explain regional patterns of economic development as revealed by data on about 70 variables for France in the middle of the nineteenth century. The development process occurred at different speed across space. The process turned out to be specific and varied across French counties. The characteristics can be classified in a three-part taxonomy based on counties’ specificities: (1) productive structure, (2) urban-uneducated versus rural-educated structure, and (3) marital structure. Most prosperous counties are characterized by a dynamic industry, gender equality, high education, fertility control within marriage, and low fertility rates. Backward counties are heavily dependent on agriculture and present gender inequalities, a poorly educated population, control of nuptiality, and high fertility rates. The findings resulting from this analysis have implications for our understanding on the origins and consequences of the development process (output growth, human capital accumulation, fertility transition). It contributes to (1) explain the trajectories followed by the French regions, (2) to disentangle the reasons behind the emergence of strengths or the persistence of weaknesses, and (3) to explain the variations in the timing and pace to reaching sustained economic growth.

Keywords

Economic development Gender Family Fertility Industrialization Nineteenth century France 

References

  1. Bairoch P (1965) Niveaux de développement économique de 1810 à 1910. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 20(6):1091–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bairoch P (1989) Les trois révolutions agricoles du monde développé : rendements et productivité de 1800 à 1985. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 44(2):317–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonneuil N (1997) Transformation of the French demographic landscape 1806–1906. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Cattell RB (1966) The Scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1:629–637Google Scholar
  5. Chavent M, Kuentz V, Saracco J (2007) Analyse en Facteurs: présentation et comparaison des logiciels SAS, SPAD et SPSS. La revue de Modulad 37:1–30Google Scholar
  6. Chesnais JC (1992) The demographic transition: stages, patterns, and economic implications. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Chilosi D, Murphy TE, Studer R, Coşkun Tunçer A (2013) Europe’s many integrations geography and grain markets, 1620–1913. Explor Econ Hist 50(1):46–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Combes PP, Lafourcade M, Thisse JF, Toutain JC (2011) The rise and fall of spatial inequalities in France: a long-run perspective. Explor Econ Hist 48(2):243–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De la Croix D, Perrin F (2016) French fertility and education transition: rational choice vs. cultural diffusion. IRES Discussion Papers, No. 2016–7, 36 pagesGoogle Scholar
  10. De Moor T, van Zanden JL (2010) Girl power: the European marriage pattern and labour markets in the North Sea in the late medieval and early modern period. Econ Hist Rev 63(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewerpe A (1992) Les systèmes industriels localisés dans l’industrialisation française, In: Ganne B (ed) Développement local et ensembles de PME, Rapport GLYSI-SAFA-Sociologies et anthropologies des formes d’action, PIRTTEMGoogle Scholar
  12. Diebolt C, Perrin F (2013) From stagnation to sustained growth: the role of female empowerment. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 103:545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobbin F (1994) Forging industrial policy: the United States, Britain, and France in the railway age. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dupont D (2004) Les processus de transformation de la famille au Québec. Aspects Sociologiques 11(1):8–31Google Scholar
  15. Durkheim E (1922) Éducation et sociologie. Alcan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Everitt B, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D (2011) Cluster analysis, 5th edn. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filmer D, Pritchett LH (2001) Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 38(1):115–132Google Scholar
  18. Flandrin JL (1984) Familles, parenté, maison, sexualité dans l’ancienne société. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Frémont A (1992) La terre. In: Pierre Nora (ed) Les Lieux de mémoire, Tome III. Quarto Gallimard, pp 3047–3080Google Scholar
  20. Galor O (2011) Unified growth theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  21. Galor O, Weil DN (2000) Population, technology, and growth: from Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. Am Econ Rev 90:806–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerschenkron A (1962) Economic backwardness in historical perspective: a book of essay. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Goode WJ (1963) World revolution and family patterns. Free Press Glencoe, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Grégoire HB (Abbé) (1794) Rapport sur la nécessité et les moyens d’anéantir les patois et d’universaliser la langue françaiseGoogle Scholar
  25. Hajnal J (1965) European marriage pattern in historical perspective. In: Glass DV, Eversley DEC (eds) Population in history. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  26. Harley CK (2002) Substitution for prerequisites: endogenous institutions and comparative economic history. In: Sylla R, Toniolo G (eds) Patterns of European industrialisation: the nineteenth century. Routledge, London, pp 29–44 Chap. 2Google Scholar
  27. Harten HC, Pitz M (1989) Mobilisation culturelle et disparités régionales. École, alphabétisation et processus culturel pendant la Révolution. Histoire de l’éducation 42:111–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henning M, Enflo K, Andersson F (2011) Trends and cycles in regional economic growth: How spatial differences shaped the Swedish growth experience from 1860–2009. Explor Econ Hist 48(4):538–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henry L, Houdaille J (1979) Célibat et âge au mariage aux XVIIIe et XIXe siècles en France : II. Age au premier mariage. Population 34:403–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. INSEE (2007) Bilan démographique. www.insee.fr
  31. Joliffe I (2014) Principal component analysis. Wiley Stats Ref: Statistics Reference, OnlineGoogle Scholar
  32. Le Bras H, Todd E (2013) Le mystère français. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindeman RH, Merenda PF, Gold RZ (1980) Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. Scott Foresman, Glenview, ILGoogle Scholar
  34. Maddison A (2008) Statistics on World Population, GDP and Per Capita GDP, 1-2008 AD. http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/Maddison.htm
  35. Murdock GP (1949) Social structure. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Oláh LS, Richter R, Kotowska IE (2014) The new roles of men and women and implications for families and societies. Families and Societies Working Paper (No. 11)Google Scholar
  37. Parsons T (1956) Family: socialization and interaction process. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Perrin F (2013) Gender equality and economic growth in the long-run. A cliometric analysis. PhD Dissertation, University of Strasbourg and Sant’Anna School of Advanced StudiesGoogle Scholar
  39. Perrin F (2014) On the construction of a historical gender gap index. An implementation on French data. AFC Working Paper, WP2014–5, 28 pagesGoogle Scholar
  40. Talleyrand C-M (1791) Rapport sur l’instruction publique fait au nom du comité des constitutions. Imprimerie nationale, ParisGoogle Scholar
  41. Todd E (1990) L’invention de l’Europe. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  42. Todd E (2011) L’origine des systèmes familiaux, Tome 1. L’Eurasie. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58(301):236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weber E (1976) Peasants into Frenchmen: The modernization of rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economic HistoryLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, MIOIRUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations