Advertisement

Gender Relations and Economic Development: Hypotheses About the Reversal of Fortune in Eurasia

  • Alexandra M. de Pleijt
  • Jan Luiten van Zanden
  • Sarah CarmichaelEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Economic History book series (SEH)

Abstract

This chapter develops an interrelated set of hypotheses about the links between gender relations, family systems and economic development in Eurasia. First, we briefly discuss a number of ideas from the recent literature about the links between gender relations and economic development. Second, we suggest a measure of historic gender relations via the classification and measurement of historical family systems and offer a set of maps of the institutions concerning marriage, inheritance and family formation that determine the degree of agency that women enjoyed at the micro level. Third, we discuss the possible explanation of the genesis of the Eurasian pattern in family systems and gender relations as a by-product of the spread of agriculture and the process of ancient state formation that followed the Neolithic Revolution 10,000 years ago. Finally, we link these patterns in family systems and female agency to economic growth after 1500. We empirically demonstrate that high female agency and per capita GDP between 1800 and 2000 are related. The ‘reversal of fortune’ that happened within Eurasia between 1000 and 2000, whereby the ancient centres of state formation and urbanization in the Middle East, India and China were overtaken by regions at the margin of the continent (Western Europe, Japan, Korea), can in our view be linked to this spatial pattern in gender relations and family systems found there.

Keywords

Gender relations Economic development Eurasia 

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Crown Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2002) Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Q J Econ 117(4):1231–1294Google Scholar
  3. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2005) The rise of Europe: atlantic trade, institutional change, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 95(3):546–579Google Scholar
  4. Agarwal B (1997) Bargaining and gender relations: within and beyond the household. Fem Econ 3(1):1–51Google Scholar
  5. Alesina A, Giuliano P, Nunn N (2013) On the origins of gender roles: women and the plough. Q J Econ 128(2):469–530Google Scholar
  6. Barro RJ (1996) Democracy and growth. J Econ Growth 1(1):1–27Google Scholar
  7. Becker GS (1960) An economic analysis of fertility. In: Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 209–240Google Scholar
  8. Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J 75:493–517Google Scholar
  9. Becker GS, Lewis HG (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 8:S279–S288Google Scholar
  10. Becker GS, Tomes N (1976) Child endowments, and the quantity and quality of children. J Polit Econ 85(4, Part 2):S143–S162Google Scholar
  11. Becker SO, Cinnirella F, Woessmann L (2010) The trade-off between fertility and education: evidence from before the demographic transition. J Econ Growth 15(3):177–204Google Scholar
  12. Bolt J (2012) A new database on the origins of institutional development. University of Groningen, Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  13. Bolt J, van Zanden JL (2014) The Maddison Project: collaborative research on historical national accounts. Econ Hist Rev 67:627–651.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.12032 Google Scholar
  14. Boserup E (1970) Woman’s role in economic development. St. Martins Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Bove R, Valeggia C (2009) Polygyny and women’s health in sub-Saharan Africa. Soc Sci Med 68:21–29Google Scholar
  16. Carmichael S (2011) Marriage and power: age at first marriage and spousal age gap in lesser developed countries. Hist Fam 16(4):416–436Google Scholar
  17. Carmichael S, Rijpma A (2017) Measuring agency. In: van Zanden JL, Rijpma A, Kok J (eds) Agency, gender and development in the world economy: testing the Sen hypothesis. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Carmichael S, van Zanden JL (2015) Towards an ethnographic understanding of the European marriage pattern: global correlates and links with female status. To be published in Richard Smith (ed) Population Histories in Context (forthcoming). Currently online available as CGEH Working Paper no. 67, 2015. http://www.cgeh.nl/sites/default/files/WorkingPapers/cgehwp67_carmichaelvanzanden.pdf
  19. Carmichael S, De Moor T, van Zanden JL (2011) Introduction. Hist Fam 16(4):309–311Google Scholar
  20. Carmichael S, Dilli S, Rijpma A (2014) Gender inequality since 1820. In: Van Zanden JL, Baten J, D’Ercole MM, Rijpma A, Smith C, Timmer M (eds) How was life? Global well-being since 1820. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Comin D, Eastery W, Gong E (2010) Was the wealth of nations determined in 1000BC? Am Econ J Macroecon 2(July 2010):65–97Google Scholar
  22. Currie J, Moretti E (2003) Mother’s education and the intergenerational transmission of human capital: evidence from college openings. Q J Econ 118(4):1495–1532Google Scholar
  23. De Moor T, Zanden JL v (2010) Girlpower. The European marriage pattern (EMP) and labour markets in the North Sea region in the late medieval and early modern period. Econ Hist Rev 63(1):1–33Google Scholar
  24. Dennison T, Ogilvie S (2014) Does the European marriage pattern explain economic growth? J Econ Hist 74(03):651–693Google Scholar
  25. Desmet K, Ortuño-Ortín I, Wacziarg R (2012) The political economy of linguistic cleavages. J Dev Econ 97:322–336Google Scholar
  26. Diamond J (1997) Guns, germs and steel. The fate of human societies. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Dilli S, Carmichael SG, Rijpma A (2018) Introducing the historical gender equality index. Fem Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2018.1442582 Google Scholar
  28. Doepke M, Tertilt M, Voena A (2012) The economics and politics of women’s rights. Ann Rev Econ 4(1):339–372Google Scholar
  29. Dollar D, Gatti R (1999) Gender inequality, income, and growth: are good times good for women? Mimeographed, The World BankGoogle Scholar
  30. Dollar D, Fishman R, Gatti R (2001) Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. J Econ Behav Organ 46(4):423–429Google Scholar
  31. Dyble M, Salali GD, Chaudhary N, Page A, Smith D, Thompson J, Vinicius L, Mace R, Migliano AB (2015) Sex equality can explain the unique social structure of hunter-gatherer bands. Science 348:796–798Google Scholar
  32. Engels F (1884/2010) The origin of the family, private property and the state. Penguin ClassicsGoogle Scholar
  33. Eswaran M (2014) Why gender matters in economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  34. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2011) The state of food and agriculture 2010–2011 – Women in AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  35. Gruber S, Szołtysek M (2015) The patriarchy index: a comparative study of power relations across historical Europe. Hist Fam.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2014.1001769 Google Scholar
  36. Hansen CW, Jensen PS, Skovsgaard CV (2015) Modern gender roles and agricultural history: the neolithic inheritance. J Econ Growth 20(4):365–404Google Scholar
  37. Keddie NR (2012) Women in the middle east: past and present. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  38. King EM, Hill MA (1997) Women’s education in developing countries: an overview. In: King EM, Hill MA (eds) Women’s education in developing countries: barriers, benefits, and policies. World Bank Publications, London, pp 1–50Google Scholar
  39. King EM, Peterson J, Adioetomo SM, Domingo LJ, Syed SH (1986) Change in the status of women across generations in Asia. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
  40. Klasen S (1999) Does gender inequality reduce growth and development: evidence from cross-country regressions (English). Policy research report on gender and development working paper series; no. 7. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/612001468741378860/Doesgender-inequality-reduce-growth-and-development-evidence-from-crosscountry-regressions
  41. Klasen S (2002) Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross-country evidence on the effect of gender inequality in education on economic development. World Bank Econ Rev 16(3):345–373Google Scholar
  42. Klasen S, Lamanna F (2009) The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: new evidence for a panel of countries. Fem Econ 15(3):91–132Google Scholar
  43. Kok J (2016) Women’s Agency in historical family systems. In: van Zanden JL, Rijpma A, Kok J (eds) Agency, gender and economic development in the world economy 1850–2000. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Kok J (2017) Women’s agency in historical family systems. In: van Zanden JL, Rijpma A, Kok J (eds) Agency, gender and development in the world economy: testing the Sen hypothesis. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Leach E (1951) The structural implications of matrilateral cross-cousin marriage. J R Anthropol Inst G B Irel 81(1/2):23–55Google Scholar
  46. Lebra J, Paulson J, Powers E (eds) (1976) Women in changing Japan. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  47. Lewis B (1982) The Muslim discovery of Europe. Phoenix, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Maddison A (2001) The World Economy: a millennial perspective. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  49. Morgan LH (1877/2013). Ancient society. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Murdock GP (1969) Ethnographic atlas. 2nd print, University of Pittsburgh PressGoogle Scholar
  51. North DC (1981) Structure and change in economic history. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. North DC, Wallis JJ, Weingast BR (2009) Violence and social orders: a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Nunn N, Puga D (2012) Ruggedness: the blessing of bad geography in Africa. Rev Econ Stat 94(1):20–36Google Scholar
  54. Olsson O, Paik C (2013) A Western reversal since the Neolithic? The long-run impact of early agriculture. Working Papers in Economics 552, University of Gothenburg, Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  55. Olsson O, Paik C (2015) Long-run cultural divergence: evidence from the neolithic revolution. Working Papers in Economics 620, University of Gothenburg, Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  56. Przeworski A, Alvarez ME, Jos'e Antonio C, Limongi F (2000) Democracy and development: political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Putterman L (2008) Agriculture, diffusion and development: ripple effects of the neolithic revolution. Economica LSE 75(300):729–748Google Scholar
  58. Rijpma A, Carmichael S (2016) Testing Todd and matching Murdock: global data on family characteristics. Econ Hist Dev Reg 30(1):10–46Google Scholar
  59. Riley SJ, DeGloria SD, Elliot R (1999) A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Int J Sci 5(1-4):1999Google Scholar
  60. Rodrik D (1999) Democracies pay higher wages. Q J Econ 114(3):707–738Google Scholar
  61. Rosenzweig MR, Schultz TP (1982) Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intrafamily resource distribution: child survival in rural India. Am Econ Rev 72(4):803–815Google Scholar
  62. Schultz TW (1961) Investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev 51:1–17Google Scholar
  63. Schultz TP (1988) Education investments and returns. Handb Dev Econ 1(1):543–630Google Scholar
  64. Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Silva-Grondin MA (2010) Women in ancient Japan: from matriarchal antiquity to acquiescent confinement. Inq J Stud Pulse 2(09). Retrieved from http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=286
  66. Strauss J, Thomas D (1995) Chapter 34: Human resources: empirical modeling of household and family decisions. In: Handbook of development economics, vol. 3, Part A, Elsevier, pp 1883–2023Google Scholar
  67. Sugano N (2003) State indoctrination of filial piety in Tokugawa Japan. Sons and daughters in the official records of filial piety. In: Ko D, Haboush JK, Piggott JR (eds) Women and Confucian cultures in premodern China, Korea, and Japan. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 170–189Google Scholar
  68. Summers LH (1992) Investing in all the people. Pak Dev Rev Pak Inst Dev Econ 31(4):367–404Google Scholar
  69. Teignier M, Cuberes D (2014) Aggregate costs of gender gaps in the labor market: a quantitative estimate. UB Economics Working Paper no. E14/308. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2405006
  70. Tertilt M (2006) Polygyny, women’s rights, and development. J Eur Econ Assoc 4:523–530Google Scholar
  71. Todd E (1985) The explanation of ideology: family structures and social systems. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  72. Todd E (1987) The causes of progress: culture, authority and change. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  73. Todd E (2011) L’Origine des systèmes familiaux, Tome 1 L’Eurasie, GallimardGoogle Scholar
  74. Trigger BG (2003) Understanding early civilizations: a comparative study. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  75. Warner RL, Lee GR, Lee J (1986) Social organization, spousal resources, and marital power: a cross-cultural study. J Marriage Fam 48(February 1986):121–128Google Scholar
  76. Weinreb AA (2008) Characteristics of women in Consanguineous marriages in Egypt, 1988–2000. Eur J Popul 24:185–210Google Scholar
  77. World Bank (2014/2015) Voice and agency, empowering women and girls for shared prosperity. http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/Gender/Voice_and_agency_LOWRES.pdf
  78. Wright KI (2007) Women and the emergence of urban society in Mesopotamia. In: etal SH (ed) Archeology and women. Ancient and modern issues. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp 199–246Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra M. de Pleijt
    • 1
  • Jan Luiten van Zanden
    • 2
  • Sarah Carmichael
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations