Development of a Prioritization Tool for Climate Change Adaptation Measures in the Forestry Sector—A Nicaraguan Case Study

  • Tania Guillén BolañosEmail author
  • María Máñez Costa
  • Udo Nehren


As developing countries frequently face limited financial resources for adaptation, the selection of respective measures and their ranking for implementation are critical processes to achieve the most from the invested means. This chapter provides an overview of a tool which pretends to help decision making related to adaptation in the forestry sector, but that could be adapted for the agriculture sector.


  1. CARE (2010) Community-based adaptation toolkit. CARE, IISDGoogle Scholar
  2. Carter T, Parry M, Harasawa H, Nishioka S (1994) IPCC technical guidelines for assessing climate change impacts and adaptations. WMO-UNEP, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Centro Alexander von Humboldt (2013) Sensibilidad de las Zonas de Vida de Holdridge en RBB en función del Cambio Climático. Centro Alexander von Humboldt, ManaguaGoogle Scholar
  4. CEPAL (2010) La economía del cambio climático en Centroamérica. Síntesis 2010. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambwera M (2010) Climate change adaptation in developing countries: issues and perspectives for economic analysis. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. CIFOR (1999) Guidelines for applying multi-criteria analysis to the assessment of criteria and indicators. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), CIFOR, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  7. DARA (2012) Climate vulnerability monitor: a guide to the cold calculus of a hot planet, 2nd edn (McKinnon M) (ed). Fundación DARA Internacional, SpainGoogle Scholar
  8. De Bruin K, Dellink R, Bolwidt L, van Buuren A, Graveland J, de Groot R et al (2009) Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Clim Change 95:23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greening L, Bernow S (2004) Desing of coordinated energy and environ-mental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making. Energy Policy 32:721–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heuson C et al (2012) Fundamental questions on the economic of climate adaptation. Outlines of a new research programme. s.l–s.nGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, van der Linden P, Hanson C (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishizaka A, Labib A (2011) Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl 38:14336–14345Google Scholar
  13. Magrin G (2015) Adaptación al cambio climático en América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL, Santiago de ChileGoogle Scholar
  14. Máñez M, Cerdá A (2014) Prioritisation method for adaptation measures to climate change in the water sector. Climate Service Center, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  15. MARENA (2012) Plan de Protección y Manejo Conjunto de la Reserva de Biosfera Bosawas. Ministerio de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, ManaguaGoogle Scholar
  16. MARENA-SETAB-GTZ (2009) Nicaragua. Reserva Biosfera de Bosawás: Ficha técnica actualiada. Retrieved from…/Ficha%20tecnica%20actualizada%20RBB.doc. 04 June 2013
  17. Mendoza G, Prabhu R (2000) Multiple criteria decision making approaches to assessing forest sustainability using criteria and indicators: a case study. For Ecol Manage 131:107–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mimura N, Pulwarty R, Duc D, Elshinnawy I, Redsteer M, Huang H et al (2014) Adaptation planning and implementation. In Field CV (ed), Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA, pp 869–898Google Scholar
  19. Nairobi Work Programme-UNFCCC (2011) Assessing the costs and benefits of adaptation options. An overview of approaches. The Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  20. Nasra A, Grafakos S, Huijsman M (2010) Assessment of adaptation measures against flooding in the city of Dhaka, Bangladesh. IHS Working Papers(25):48Google Scholar
  21. Noble I, Huq S, Anokhin Y, Carmin J, Goudou D, Lansigan F et al (2014) Adaptation needs and options. In Field CV (ed) Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA, pp 833–868Google Scholar
  22. Saaty T (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saaty T (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98Google Scholar
  24. UNDP (2004) In: Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E (eds) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. UNEP (2011) A practical framework for planning pro-development climate policy. United Nations Environment Programme, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  26. UNFCCC (2011) Conference of the parties: report of the conference of the parties on its sixteenth session. Decisions adopted by the Conference of the parties. Retrieved from 21 Jan 2013
  27. UNFCCC (2015) Adaptation committee: navigating the landscape of support for the process to formulate and implement national adaptation plans. 2015 Overview for developing countries. UNFCCC, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. UNFCCC Secretariat (2005) Compendium on methods and tools to evaluate impacts of, and vulnerability and adaptation to, climate change. UNFCCC, BonnGoogle Scholar
  29. Vaidya O, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania Guillén Bolaños
    • 1
    Email author
  • María Máñez Costa
    • 1
  • Udo Nehren
    • 2
  1. 1.Climate Service Center Germany (GERICS)Helmholtz Zentrum GeesthachtHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Technology and Resources Management in the Tropics and Subtropics (ITT)TH-Köln—University of Applied SciencesCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations