Advertisement

Establishing Correlation Between Abiotic Stress and Isoprene Emission of Selected Plant Species

  • Pallavi Saxena
  • Chirashree Ghosh
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)

Abstract

The atmospheric hydrocarbon budget influenced by a vast range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is both anthropogenic and biogenic in origin. Evolution of plant VOCs is a complex process affected by interactions of plants with biotic and abiotic factors in constantly changing environment but their functional role is still a matter of speculation. Isoprene (2-methyl 1,3-butadiene), a five-carbon hydrocarbon, is emitted from the leaves of many plant species. In the present study, isoprene emission potential of two urban plant species (Dalbergia sissoo and Nerium oleander) were measured using branch enclosure method at different selected sites on the basis of proximity to traffic density. In order to find out the dependence of isoprene emission with abiotic factors (temperature and photosynthetic active radiation PAR), regression analysis has been performed. In the case of Dalbergia sp. high temperature and PAR promote high isoprene emission during summer months. Thus, positive linear relationship gives the best fit between temperature, PAR, and isoprene emission rate during summer season as compared to other seasons, whereas in the case of Nerium sp., no such appropriate relationship was obtained. The study concludes that Dalbergia sissoo comes under high isoprene emission category, while Nerium oleander comes under BDL (below detection limit) variety. For any greenbelt development program, it is very important to select the type of plant species to be planted. The present small study reflects that Nerium oleander should be planted in the outskirts of selected areas and that planting of Dalbergia sissoo should be done on low scale so that the air remains clean and indirect production of tropospheric ozone, aerosol production will be minimized.

Keywords

Isoprene Temperature PAR Roadside VOCs and air quality 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors pay sincere thanks to Dr. Ajay, Senior Technical Assistant, Advanced Instrumentation Research Facility (AIRF), Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi for analysis of isoprene samples in GC-FID. The authors are also highly grateful to Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for awarding a Senior Research Fellowship (SRF).

References

  1. Benjamin MT, Sudol M, Bloch L, Winer AM (1996) Low emitting urban forests: a taxonomic methodology for assigning isoprene and monoterpene emission rate. Atmos Environ 30:1437–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezemer TM, van Dam NM (2005) Linking aboveground and belowground interactions via induced plant defences. Trends Ecol Evol 20:617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brilli F, Barta C, Fortunati A, Lerdau M, Loreto F, Centritto M (2007) Response of isoprene emission and carbon metabolism to drought in white poplar (Populus alba) saplings. New Phytol 175:244–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chameides WL, Lindsay RW, Richardson J, Kiang CS (1988) The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study. Science 241:1473–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen F, Tholl D, Bohlmann J, Pichersky E (2011) The family of terpene synthases in plants: a mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom. Plant J 66:212–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dudareva N, Andersson S, Orlova I, Gatto N, Reichelt M, Rhodes D (2005) From the cover: the nonmevalonate pathway supports both monoterpene and sesquiterpene formation in snapdragon flowers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:933–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Estévez JM, Cantero A, Reindl A, Reichler S, Leon P (2001) 1-Deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase, a limiting enzyme for plastidic isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants. J Biol Chem 276:22901–22909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fares S, Barta C, Brilli F, Centritto M, Ederli L, Ferranti F, Pasqualini S, Reale L, Tricoli D, Loreto F (2006) Impact of high ozone on isoprene emission, photosynthesis and histology of developing Populus alba leaves directly or indirectly exposed to the pollutant. Physiol Plant 128:456–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Font X, Artola A, Sánchez A (2011) Detection, composition and treatment of volatile organic compounds from waste treatment plants. Sensors 11:4043–4059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goyal A, Khaliq L (2011) Pulmonary functions and ambient air pollution in residents of Delhi. Ind J Med Spec 2(2):96–100Google Scholar
  11. Guenther A, Hewitt CN, Erickson D, Fall R, Geron C, Graedel T (1995) A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions. J Geophys Res 100:8873–8892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guenther A, Karl T, Harley P, Wiedinmyer C, Palmer PI, Geron C (2006) Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (model of emissions of gases and aerosols from nature). Atmos Chem Phys 6:3181–3210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harley PC, Litvak ME, Sharkey TD, Monson RK (1994) Isoprene emission from velvet bean leaves. Interactions among nitrogen availability, growth photon flux density, and leaf development. Plant Physiol 105:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harley PC, Monson RK, Lerdau MT (1999) Ecological and evolutionary aspects of isoprene emission from plants. Oecologia 118:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harley P, Vasconcellos P, Vierling L, Pinheiro CCS, Greenberg J, Guenther A, Klinger L, Almeida SS, Neill D, Baker T, Phillips O, Malhi Y (2004) Variation in potential for isoprene emissions among neotropical forest sites. Glob Chang Biol 10:630–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hassiotou F, Evans JR, Ludwig M, Veneklaas EJ (2009) Stomatal crypts may facilitate diffusion of CO2 to adaxial mesophyll cells in thick sclerophylls. Plant Cell Environ 32:1596–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hewitt CN (2009) Biogenic volatile organic compounds in the earth system. New Phytol 183:27–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iriti M, Faoro R (2009) Chemical diversity and defense metabolism: how plants cope with pathogens and ozone pollution. Int J Mol Sci 10:3371–3399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karlik JF, Winer AM (2001) Measured isoprene emission rates of plants in California landscapes: comparison to estimates from taxonomic relationships. Atmos Environ 35:1123–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knoppel H, Versino B, Peil A, Schauenburg H, Vissers H (1981) Quantitative determination of terpenes emitted by conifers. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium on physicochemical behaviour of atmospheric pollutants, Varese, Italy, September 29 October 2001, Joint Research Center, Ispra, 89–98Google Scholar
  21. Köksal M, Zimmer I, Schnitzler J-P, Christianson DW (2010) Structure of isoprene synthase illuminates the chemical mechanism of teragram atmospheric carbon emission. J Mol Biol 402:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lakušić B, Popov V, Runjajić-Antić D (2007) Morphoanatomical characteristics of the raw materials of the herbal drug Olivae folium and its counterfeits. Arch Biol Sci Belg 59:187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loreto F, Schnitzler JP (2010) Abiotic stresses and induced BVOCs: a review. Trends Plant Sci 15:154–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loreto F, Forster A, Durr M, Cisky O, Seufert G (1998) On the monoterpene emission under heat stress and on the increased thermotolerance of leaves of Quercus ilex L. fumigated with selected monoterpenes. Plant Cell Environ 21:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mithofer A, Boland W (2012) Plant Defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:431–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Monson RK, Jaeger CH, Adams WW, Driggers EM, Silver GM, Fall R (1992) Relationships among isoprene emission rate, photosynthesis and isoprene synthase activity as influenced by temperature. Plant Physiol 98:1175–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Monson RK, Jones RT, Rosenstiel TN, Schnitzler JP (2012) Why only some plants emit isoprene. Plant Cell Environ. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Owen SM, Peñuelas J (2005) Opportunistic emissions of volatile isoprenoids. Trends Plant Sci 10:420–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Owen S, Boissard C, Street R, Duckham S, Csky O, Hewitt CN (1997) Screening of 18 Mediterranean plant species for VOC emissions. Atmos Environ 31:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peñuelas J, Llusia J (2003) BVOCs: plant defense against climate warming? Trends Plant Sci 8(3):105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pichersky E, Sharkey TD, Gershenzon J (2006) Plant volatiles: a lack of function or a lack of knowledge? Trends Plant Sci 11:421–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Possell M, Nicholas Hewitt C, Beerling DJ (2005) The effects of glacial atmospheric CO2 concentrations and climate on isoprene emissions by vascular plants. Glob Chang Biol 11:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rasmussen RA (1972) What do hydrocarbons from trees contribute to air pollution. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 22:537–542Google Scholar
  34. Rodriguez-Concepción M (2010) Supply of precursors for carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Arch Biochem Biophys 504(SI):118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roth-Nebelsick A, Hassiotou F, Veneklaas EJ (2009) Stomatal crypts have small effects on transpiration: a numerical model analysis. Plant Physiol 151:2018–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanadze GA, Kursanov AL (1966) On certain conditions of the evolution of the diene C5H8 from poplar leaves. Sov Plant Physiol 13:184–189Google Scholar
  37. Sanadze GA, Kalandaze AN (1966) Light and temperature curves of the evolution of C5H8. Sov Plant Physiol 13:458–461Google Scholar
  38. Saxena P, Ghosh C (2013) Ornamental plants as sinks and bioindicators. Environ Technol 34(21-24):3059–3067. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.800590 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schnitzler JP, Arenz R, Steinbrecher R, Lehning A (1996) Characterization of an isoprene synthase from leaves of Quercus petracea Liebl. Bot Acta 109:216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwender J, Zeidler J, Groner R, Muller C, Focke M, Braun S (1997) Incorporation of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose into isoprene and phytol by higher plants and algae. FEBS Lett 414:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. SFR. State of Forest Report, Forest survey of India (2005) Government of India: ministry of environment and forest. 1–212Google Scholar
  42. Sharkey TD, Singsaas EL, Vanderveer PJ, Geron C (1996) Field measurements of isoprene emission from trees in response to temperature and light. Tree Physio 16(7):649–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharkey T (1996) Emission of low molecular mass hydrocarbons from plants. Trends Plant Sci 1:78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharkey TD, Singsaas EL (1995) Why plants emit isoprene? Nature 374:769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharkey TD, Loreto F, Delwiche CF (1991) High carbon dioxide and sun/shade effects on isoprene emission from oak and aspen tree leaves. Plant Cell Environ 14(3):333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharkey TD, Yeh SS (2001) Isoprene emission from plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:407–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharkey TD, Yeh S, Wiberley AE, Falbel TG, Gong D, Fernandez DE (2005) Evolution of the isoprene biosynthetic pathway in kudzu. Plant Physiol 137:700–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharkey TD, Wiberley AE, Donohue AR (2008) Isoprene emission from plants: why and how? Ann Bot 101:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silver GM, Fall R (1991) Enzymatic synthesis of isoprene from dimethylallyl diphosphate in aspen leaf extracts. Plant Physiol 97:1588–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singsaas EL, Sharkey TD (2000) The effects of high temperature on isoprene synthesis in oak leaves. Plant Cell Environ 23(7):751–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singsaas EL, Lerdau M, Winter K, Sharkey TD (1997) Isoprene increases thermotolerance of isoprene-emitting leaves. Plant Physiol 115:1413–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singsaas EL, Laporte MM, Shi JZ, Monson RK, Bowling DR, Johnson K, Lerdau MK, Jasentuliytana A, Sharkey TD (1999) Leaf temperature fluctuation affects isoprene emission from red oak (Quercus rubra L.) leaves. Tree Physiol 19:917–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Street RA, Duckham S, Hewitt CN (1996) Laboratory and field studies of biogenic VOC emissions from Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensisbong) in the UK. J Geophys Res 101:22799–22806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tao Z, Jain AK (2005) Modeling of global biogenic emissions for key indirect greenhouse gases and their response to atmospheric CO2 increases and changes in land cover and climate. J Geophys Res 110:D213–D209Google Scholar
  55. Tingey DT, Manning M, Grothaus LC, Burns WF (1979) The influence of light and temperature on isoprene emission rates from live oak. Physiol Plant 47:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. USEPA (Centre for Environmental Research Information) (1999) TO-15, Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Collected in Specially-Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)Google Scholar
  57. Westberg H, Lamb B, Kempf K, Allwine G (2000) Isoprene emission inventory for the BOREAS southern study area. Tree Physiol 20:735–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimmerman PR, Chatfield RB, Fishman J, Crutzen PJ, Hanst PL (1978) Estimation of the production of CO2 and H2 from the oxidation of hydrocarbon emission from vegetation. Geophys Res Lett 5:679–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pallavi Saxena
    • 1
  • Chirashree Ghosh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences, Hindu CollegeUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia
  2. 2.Environmental Pollution Laboratory, Department of Environmental StudiesUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations