Advertisement

Anti-Creationist Positions, Organizations and Their Actions

  • Tom Kaden
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the two most important anti-creationist positions in the United States, anti-theistic and ‘nomatic’ anti-creationism. The structure of this chapter differs from the preceding ones on creationism in that they first presented creationist ideas, and then creationist organizations. This two-step approach will also be applied to the treatment of ‘nomatic’ anti-creationism in this chapter, but the ideas and proponents of anti-theistic anti-creationism will be presented together. The reason for this is the difference in structure of this form of opposition to creationism. In the confrontation between creationists and anti-creationists, the position of New Atheism is closely linked to its articulation by a small number of leading representatives, such as Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, and especially Richard Dawkins. A separate presentation of ideas and representation would only complicate the understanding of this phenomenon. Hence, the presentation of ​​anti-theistic anti-creationism as an idea in the struggle of ideas coincides with its presentation as a social group in the dispute with other social groups.

References

  1. Amarasingam, A. (Ed.). (2010). Religion and the new atheism: A critical appraisal. Brill: Leiden.Google Scholar
  2. Berkman, M., & Plutzer, E. (2005). Ten thousand democracies: Politics and public opinion in America’s school districts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Coyne, J. (2011). Accommodationism at Berkeley/NCSE website. https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/accommodationism-at-berkeleyncse-website/. Accessed 22 Jan 2018.
  4. Davie, G. (2012). Belief and unbelief: Two sides of a coin. Approaching Religion, 2(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  7. Dawkins, R. (1995). River out of eden: A Darwinian view of life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell. London: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Denton, M. (1986). Evolution: A theory in crisis. Adler & Adler: Bethesda.Google Scholar
  11. Eldredge, N. (1982). The monkey business: A scientist looks at creationism. New York: Washington Square Books.Google Scholar
  12. Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping Magisteria. Natural History, 106(2), 16–22.Google Scholar
  13. Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3(2), 115–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hess, P. M. J. (2009). God and evolution. https://ncse.com/library-resource/god-evolution. Accessed 22 Jan 2018.
  15. Iannaccone, L., & Lutz, F. W. (1994). The crucible of democracy: The local arena. Journal of Education Policy, 9(5), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IRS. (2018). Lobbying. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/lobbying. Accessed 24 Jan 2018.
  17. Laudan, L. (1983). The demise of the demarcation problem. In L. Laudan & R. S. Cohen (Eds.), Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis: Essays in honor of Adolf Grunbaum (pp. 111–127). Boston: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore, R., & Decker, M. D. (2009). More than Darwin: The people and places of the evolution-creationism controversy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Morris, H. (1986). The Paluxy River mystery. http://www.icr.org/article/paluxy-river-mystery/. Accessed 24 Jan 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moyer, W. (1980). The problem won’t go away. The American Biology Teacher, 42(Heft 4), 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Association of Biology Teachers. (1973). Resolutions of learned societies in the textbook controversy. The American biology teacher, 35(Heft 1), 35–36.Google Scholar
  22. National Center for Science Education. (n.d.-a). Tennessee. https://ncse.com/news/tennessee. Accessed 19 Jan 2018.
  23. National Center for Science Education. (n.d.-b). Climate change. https://ncse.com/climate. Accessed 24 Jan 2018.
  24. Numbers, R. L. (2006). The creationists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Park, H.-J. (1997). Anti-creationism in America. Dissertation, University of Melbourne, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  26. Scott, E. (2000a). The creation/evolution continuum. http://ncse.com/creationism/general/creationevolution-continuum. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  27. SpringerLink. (2018). Evolution: Education and outreach. https://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/12052. Accessed 24 Jan 2018.
  28. The National Center for Science Education. (1989). Voices for evolution. Berkeley, o. V.Google Scholar
  29. The National Center for Science Education. (1992). Reviews of creationist books. Berkeley, o.V.Google Scholar
  30. Weinberg, S., et al. (1980). Creationism in Iowa. Science, 208(Heft 4449), 1208–1301.Google Scholar
  31. Woodward, T. (2003). Doubts about Darwin. A history of intelligent design. Grand Rapids: Baker Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Kaden
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of SociologyBayreuth UniversityBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations