Advertisement

Analysis of the Legal Risk in the Scientific Experiment of the Machining of Magnesium Alloys

  • Dorota Habrat
  • Dorota Stadnicka
  • Witold Habrat
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

In the article, the legal risk of the researcher in the case of a scientific experiment in the machining of magnesium alloys was determined. The use of magnesium alloys in industry and identification of the problems associated with machining were presented. The issues concerning legal liability in the experiment and provisions ensuring a greater scope of legal protection for the researcher were indicated and challenges in the machining of magnesium alloys were analyzed. Moreover, the method to assess legal risk in experiments was proposed and its application in the experiments was presented. The analysis confirmed the applicability of the proposed method to the analysis of the legal risk.

Keywords

Risk analysis Experiment Legal responsibility Machining Magnesium alloys 

References

  1. 1.
    Kainer, K.U. (ed.): Magnesium Alloys and Their Applications. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ostrovsky, L., Henn, Y.: Present state and future of magnesium application in aerospace industry. In: International Conference “New Challenges Aeronautics”. In: ASTEC 2007, pp. 1–5 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Czerwinski, F.: Controlling the ignition and flammability of magnesium for aerospace applications. Corros. Sci. 86, 1–16 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mozgawa, M. (ed.): Criminal law. The general part (In Polish: Prawo karne. Część ogólna), Warszawa (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kubiak, R.: Justification of the allowed experiment in the light of collision theory of goods and social profitability (In Polish: Kontratyp dozwolonego eksperymentu w świetle teorii kolizji dóbr i opłacalności społecznej), Państwo i Prawo (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gałuszka, A.: The risk of innovation in the new penal code (In Polish: Ryzyko nowatorstwa w nowym kodeksie karnym), Prokur. i Prawo, no. 2 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sadgrove, K.: The Complete Guide to Business Risk Management. Routledge, London (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zagórski, I., Kuczmaszewski, J.: Efektywność i bezpieczeństwo frezowania stopów magnezu Effectiveness and safety during milling magnesium alloys. Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    BG-Regel: BGR 204 Umgang mit Magnesium (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friemuth, T., Winkler, J.: Machining of magnesium workpieces. Adv. Eng. Mater. 1, 183–186 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carou, D., Rubio, E.M., Lauro, C.H., Davim, J.P.: Experimental investigation on finish intermittent turning of UNS M11917 magnesium alloy under dry machining. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 75, 1417–1429 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hou, J.Z., Zhou, W., Zhao, N.: Methods for prevention of ignition during machining of magnesium alloys. Key Eng. Mater. 447–448, 150–154 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuczmaszewski, J., Zagórski, I., Dziubinska, A.: Investigation of ignition temperature, time to ignition and chip morphology after the high-speed dry milling of magnesium alloys. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 88, 389–396 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zagórski, I., Kuczmaszewski, J.: Study of chip ignition and chip morphology after milling of magnesium alloys. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 10, 101–108 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan, F.I., Abassi, S.A.: TOPHAZOP: a knowledge-based software tool for conducting HAZOP in a rapid, efficient yet inexpensive manner. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 10(5–6), 333–343 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Venkatasubramanian, V., et al.: Intelligent systems for HAZOP analysis of complex process plants. Comput. Chem. Eng. 24, 2291–2302 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brereton, S., McLouth, L., Odell, B., Singh, M., Tobin, M., Trent, M., Yatabe, J.: Overview of the preliminary safety analysis of the national ignition facilitiy. J. Fusion Energy 16(1/2), 85–94 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hammer, W., Price, D.: Occupational Safety Management and Engineering, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sevcik, F.: Current and future concepts in FMEA. In: Proceedings – Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 414–421 (1981)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kjellen, U.: Prevention of Accidents through Experience Feedback. CRC Press, London and New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aven, T.: Foundations of Risk Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cooper, D.F., Grey, S., Raymond, G., Walker, P.: Project Risk Management Guidelines: Managing Risk in Large Projects and Complex Procurements. Wiley, Chichester (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lawley, H.G.: Operability studies and hazard analysis. Chem. Eng. Prog. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 4, 45–56 (1974)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Law and AdministrationUniversity of RzeszowRzeszowPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and AeronauticsRzeszow University of TechnologyRzeszowPoland

Personalised recommendations