Advertisement

Evaluation of Possibility of AISI 304 Stainless Steel Mechanical Surface Treatment with Ultrasonically Enhanced Pulsating Water Jet

  • Dominika Lehocká
  • Vladimír Simkulet
  • Jiří Klich
  • Zdeněk Štorkan
  • Lucie Krejčí
  • Ján Kepič
  • Jaroslav Birčák
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Experimental study described in this article is focused on evaluation of dynamic effect of PWJ on disintegration efficiency on AISI 304 stainless steel surface. AISI304 stainless steel was disintegrated with circular nozzle diameter 1.19 mm, pressure 70 MPa, frequency 20.25 kHz and traverse speed 100 mm.s−1 (202 impacts per millimeter). Disintegration efficiency was evaluated based on surface and subsurface characteristics. Surface characteristics were evaluated based on surface topography and roughness parameters Ra [μm], Rz [μm], Rp [μm] and Rv [μm] comparison of disintegrated and non-affected area. Subsurface changes in material structure were described based on metallographic analysis and hardness measurement HV0.2 under the eroded area. The results of the disintegration efficiency evaluation of AISI 304 stainless steel surface show that was no massive erosion of material. Surface quality was slightly changed. Small microscopic craters were predominantly created on surface. Craters were characterized with predominant pitting mechanism and prevails fracture mechanism of material removal.

Keywords

Ultrasonic Pulsating water jet Surface topography Microstructure Stainless steel 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by projects: VEGA 1/0096/18, KEGA č. 036TUKE-4/2017, APVV-15-0700 and by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic projects No. FV 10446 and FV 30233. The experiments were conducted with the support of the Institute of Clean Technologies for Mining and Utilization of Raw Materials for Energy Use - Sustainability Program, reg. no. LO1406 financed by Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, and supported by a project for the long-term conceptual development of the research institution RVO: 68145535.

References

  1. 1.
    Valicek, J., Harnicarova, M., Panda, A., et al.: Mechanism of creating the topography of an abrasive water jet cut surface. In: Machining, Joining and Modifications of Advanced Materials, vol. 61, pp. 111–120. Springer, Singapore (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1082-8_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raudensky, M., Horak, A., Horsky, J., et al.: Hydraulic descaling improvement, findings of jet structure on water hammer effect. Rev. de Metall.-Cah. d Inf. Tech. 104(2), 84–90 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1051/metal:2007133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kirols, H.S., Kevorkov, D., Uihlein, A., Medraj, M.: The effect of initial surface roughness on water droplet erosion behaviour. Wear 342, 198–209 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2015.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sitek, L., Foldyna, J., Martinec, P., et al.: Use of pulsating water jet technology for removal of concrete in repair of concrete structures. Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng. 6(4), 235–242 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Foldyna, J., Sitek, L., Martinec, P., et al.: Rock cutting by pulsing water jets. In: Eurock 2005: Impact of Human Activity on the Geological Environment, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 129–134. A A Belkema Publisher (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dehkhoda, S., Hood, M.: An experimental study of surface and sub-surface damage in pulsed water-jet breakage of rocks. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 63, 138–147 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klich, J., Klichova, D., Hlavacek, P.: Effects of pulsating water jet on aluminium alloy with variously modified surface. Tech. Gaz. 24(2), 341–345 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20140219100749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hnizdil, M., Raudensky, M.: Descaling by pulsating water jet. In: METAL 2010 - 19th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Roznov pod Radhostem, Czech Republic, pp. 209–2013. Tanger LTD (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hloch, S., Foldyna, J., Sitek, L., et al.: Disintegration of bone cement by continuous and pulsating water jet. Tech. Gaz. 20(4), 593–598 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Turski, M., Clitheroe, S., Evans, A.D., et al.: Engineering the residual stress state and microstructure of stainless steel with mechanical surface treatments. Appl. Phys. A – Mater. Sci. Process. 99(3), 549–556 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-010-5672-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    He, Y., Yoo, K.B., Ma, H., Shin, K.: Study of the austenitic stainless steel with gradient structured surface fabricated via shot peening. Mater. Lett. 215, 187–190 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jayalakshmi, M., Bhat, B.R., Bhat, K.U.: Effect of shot peening coverage on surface nanostructuring of 316L stainless steel and its influence on low temperature plasma-nitriding. Mater. Perform. Charact. 6(4), 561–570 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1520/MPC20160079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalainathan, S., Sathyajith, S., Swaroop, S.: Effect of laser shot peening without coating on the surface properties and corrosion behavior of 316L steel. Opt. Lasers Eng. 50(12), 1740–1745 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Todaka, Y., Umemoto, M., Tsuchiya, K.: Comparison of nanocrystalline surface layer in steels formed by air blast and ultrasonic shot peening. Mater. Trans. 45(2), 376–379 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.45.376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun, Q.Q., Han, Q.Y., Xu, R., et al.: Localized corrosion behaviour of AA7150 after ultrasonic shot peening: corrosion depth vs. impact energy. Corros. Sci. 130, 218–230 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Botko, F., Hatala, M., Kormos, M.: Using edgecam for creating CNC programs in education process. In: IEEE 13th International Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI), Herľany, Slovakia, pp. 255–259. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muruganandhan, R., Mugilvalavan, M., Thirumavalavan, K., Yuvaraj, N.: Investigation of water jet peening process parameters on AL6061-T6. Surf. Eng. 34(4), 330–340 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2017.1394564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiang, W.C., Luo, Y., Wang, H., Wang, B.Y.: Effect of impact pressure on reducing the weld residual stress by water jet peening in repair weld to 304 stainless steel clad plate. J. Press. Vessel Technol.-Trans. ASME 137(3), 031401 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Azhari, A., Sulaiman, S., Rao, R.K.P.: A review on the application of peening processes for surface treatment. In: 2nd International Manufacturing Engineering Conference and 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Manufacturing Systems (IMEC-APCOMS 2015), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2015). IOP Conference Series-Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 114, Article number: 012002. IOP Publishing Ltd., (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/114/1/012002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bai, F.S., Saalbach, K.A., Long, Y.Y., et al.: Capability evaluation of ultrasonic cavitation peening at different standoff distances. Ultrasonics 84, 38–44 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2017.10.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Macron, A., Melkote, S.N., Castle, J., et al.: Effect of jet velocity in co-flow water cavitation jet peening. Wear 360, 38–50 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.03.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bai, F.S., Saalbach, K.A., Wang, L., et al.: Impact of time on ultrasonic cavitation peening via detection of surface plastic deformation. Ultrasonics 84, 350–355 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peng, G., Oguma, Y., Shimizu, S.: Visualization observation of cavitation cloud shedding in a submerged water jet. In: 3rd Symposium on Fluid-structure-Sound Interactions and Control (FSSIC), Perth, Australia (2015). Fluid-Structure-Sound Interactions and Control. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 229–234. Springer, Berlin (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48868-3_37Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang, Y.N., Qian, Z.D., Wu, D.Z., et al.: Fundamentals of cavitation and bubble dynamics with engineering applications. Adv. Mech. Eng. 9(3) (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017698321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peng, G., Oguma, Y., Shimizu, S.: Numerical analysis of cavitation cloud shedding in a submerged water jet. In: 2nd Conference of Global Chinese Scholars on Hydrodynamics (CCSH 2016), Wuxi, China, pp. 263–269. China Ocean Press (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kušnerová, M., Foldyna, J., Sitek, L., et al.: Innovative approach to advanced modulated waterjet technology. Tech. Gaz. 19(3), 475–480 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ríha, Z., Foldyna, J.: Ultrasonic pulsations of pressure in a water jet cutting tool. Tech. Gaz. 19(3), 487–491 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lehocka, D., Klich, J., Foldyna, J., et al.: Copper alloys disintegration using pulsating water jet. Measurement 82, 375–383 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.01.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lehocká, D., Klich, J., Foldyna, J., et al.: Surface integrity evaluation of brass CW614 N after impact of acoustically excited pulsating water jet. In: ICMEM 2016, International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering and materials. Procedia Engineering, Nový Smokovec, Slovakia, vol. 149, pp. 236–244. Elsevier Science BV (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lehocka, D., Klichova, D., Foldyna, J., et al.: Comparison of the influence of acoustically enhanced pulsating water jet on selected surface integrity characteristics of CW004A copper and CW614 N brass. Measurement 110, 230–238 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lehocka, D., Simkulet, V., Legutko, S.: Assessment of deformation characteristics on CW004A copper influenced by acoustically enhanced water jet. In: MANUFACTURING 2017, 5th International Scientific-Technical Conference on Advances in Manufacturing, Poznan, Poland, pp. 717–724. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_69Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lehocká, D., Botko, F., Simkulet, V., et al.: Study of surface topography of CW004A copper after PWJ disintegration. In: MMS Conference, 2nd EAI International Conference on Management of Manufacturing Systems, Starý Smokovec, Slovakia. ACM (2018).  https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.22-11-2017.2274347
  33. 33.
    Foldyna, J., Klich, J., Hlavacek, P., et al.: Erosion of metals by pulsating water jet. Tech. Gaz. 19(2), 381–386 (2012)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thomas, G.P., Brunton, J.H.: Drop impingement erosion of metals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 314, 549–565 (1970).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1970.0022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominika Lehocká
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vladimír Simkulet
    • 1
  • Jiří Klich
    • 2
  • Zdeněk Štorkan
    • 3
  • Lucie Krejčí
    • 3
  • Ján Kepič
    • 4
  • Jaroslav Birčák
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies with A Seat in PresovTechnical University of KosicePresovSlovak Republic
  2. 2.Institute of GeonicsThe Czech Academy of SciencesOstrava-PorubaCzech Republic
  3. 3.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringVSB - Technical University of OstravaOstrava-PorubaCzech Republic
  4. 4.Institute of Materials ResearchSlovak Academy of Sciences, UMV SAVKosiceSlovak Republic

Personalised recommendations