Advertisement

Impact of Structural Damage Zones on Slope Stability: A Case Study from Mandakini Valley, Uttarakhand State (India)

  • Mohit KumarEmail author
  • Ramesh Chander Joshi
  • Pitamber Dutt Pant
Chapter
Part of the Springer Geology book series (SPRINGERGEOL)

Abstract

We map structural damage zone along the Mandakini River from Sonparyag to Kund, Higher Himalaya. We present the relationship between structural damage zones and slope stability. Different kind of shear zone rocks/damage zone rocks; mylonitic gneiss, mylonitic augen gneiss, ultramylonite, protomylonite and phyllonite are present. A major tectonic structure: the Munsiari Thrust (MT) or Main Central Thrust-1 (MCT-1) passes near the Kund village and that thrust zone is more prone for landslides. Damage zone areas are more unstable and vulnerable for landslides. To confirm our field observation, slope kinematics analysis for type of failure and slope mass rating (SMR) are performed.

Keywords

Damage zone Shear Kinematics Slope mass rating (SMR) Slope etc. 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are very thankful to the Department of Geography, DSB Campus Kumaun University Nainital to provide the necessary facility for the research. Authors are also very thanking to the NRDMS, Department of Science and Technology to the financial assistance in the project no. NRDMS/06/11/015 (G) Dt. 11.08.2015 “Large Scale Geological-Geomorphological Mapping of Rudraprayag-Sonprayag Area, Mandakini valley National highway No.109. Reviewing and editorial handling by Soumyajit Mukherjee. This work is summarized in Mukherjee (2019). The Springer team is thanked for assistance in proofreading.

References

  1. Ambrosi C, Crosta GB (2011) Valley slope influence on deformation mechanisms of rock slopes. In: Jaboyedoff M (ed) Slope tectonics, vol 351. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, pp 215–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badger TC (2002) Fracturing within anticlines and its kinematic control on slope stability. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 8, 19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classification. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bose N, Dutta D, Mukherjee S (2018) Role of grain-size in phyllonitisation: Insights from mineralogy, microstructures, strain analyses and numerical modeling. Journal of Structural Geology 112, 39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brencich A, Cassini G, Pera D, Riotto G (2013) Calibration and reliability of the rebound (Schmidt) hammer test. Civil Engineering and Architecture 1, 66–78Google Scholar
  6. Brideau M-A, Stead D, Couture R (2006) Structural and engineering geology of the east gate landslide, Purcell mountains, British Columbia, Canada. Engineering Geology 84, 183–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caine JS, Evans JP, Forster CB (1996) Fault zone architecture and permeability structure. Geology 24, 1025–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chester FM, Logan JM (1986) Implications for mechanical properties of brittle faults from observations of the Punchbowl fault zone, California. Pure and Applied Geophysics 124, 79–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Childs C, Manzocchi T, Walsh JJ, Bonson CG, Nicol A, Schöpfer MPJ (2009) A geometric model of fault zone and fault rock thickness variations. Journal of Structural Geology 31, 117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi JH, Edwards P, Ko K, Kim YS (2016) Definition and classification of fault damage zones: a review and a new methodological approach. Earth-Science Reviews 152, 70–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowie PA, Scholz CH (1992) Growth of faults by accumulation of seismic slip. Journal of Geophysical Research 97, 11085–11095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dasgupta S, Mukherjee S (2017) Brittle shear tectonics in a narrow continental rift: asymmetric non-volcanic Barmer basin (Rajasthan, India). The Journal of Geology 125, 561–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flodin EA, Aydin A (2004) Evolution of a strike-slip fault network, Valley of Fire State Park, southern Nevada. Geological Society of America Bulletin 116, 42–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghosh SK (1993) Structural geology, fundamentals and modern developments, vol 1. Pergamon Press, p 598Google Scholar
  15. Gupta V, Bist KS (2004) The 23 September 2003 Varunavat Parvat landslide in Uttarkashi city, Uttaranchal. Current Science 87, 1600–1605Google Scholar
  16. Hoek E, Bray J (1981) Rock slope engineering. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM) (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in a rock mass. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts 6, 319–368Google Scholar
  18. ISRM (1981) Suggested methods for determining hardness and abrasiveness of rocks. Rock characterization, testing and monitoring: ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 95–96Google Scholar
  19. ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Jamison WR, Stearns DW (1982) Tectonic deformation of Wingate Sandstone, Colorado National Monument. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 66, 2584–2608Google Scholar
  21. Kim YS, Peacock DCP, Sanderson DJ (2004a) Fault damage zones. Structural Geology 26, 503–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim YS, Peacock DCP, Sanderson DJ (2004b) Fault damage zones. Structural Geology 26, 503–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar M, Rana S, Pant PD, Patel RC (2017) Slope stability analysis of Balia Nala landslide, Kumaun Lesser Himalaya, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 9, 150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGrath AG, Davison I (1995) Damage zone geometry around fault tips. Structural Geology 17, 1011–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukherjee S (2010a) Structures in Meso- and Micro-scales in the Sutlej section of the Higher Himalayan Shear Zone, Indian Himalaya. e-Terra 7, 1–27Google Scholar
  26. Mukherjee S (2010b) Microstructures of the Zanskar Shear Zone. E-journal: Earth Science India 3, 9–27Google Scholar
  27. Mukherjee S (2011) Mineral fish: their morphological classification, usefulness as shear sense indicators and genesis. International Journal of Earth Sciences 100, 1303–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mukherjee S (2013a) Channel flow extrusion model to constrain dynamic viscosity and Prandtl number of the Higher Himalayan Shear Zone. International Journal of Earth Sciences 102, 1811–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mukherjee S (2013) Deformation microstructures in rocks. Springer Geochemistry/Mineralogy, Berlin, pp 1–111. ISBN 978-3-642-25608-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mukherjee S (2014) Atlas of shear zone structures in Meso-scale. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00089-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mukherjee S (2015a) A review on out-of-sequence deformation in the Himalaya. In: Mukherjee S, Carosi R, van der Beek P, Mukherjee BK, Robinson D (eds) Tectonics of the Himalaya, vol 412. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, pp 67–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mukherjee S (2015) Atlas of structural geology. Elsevier. Amsterdam. ISBN: 978-0-12-420152-1Google Scholar
  33. Mukherjee S (2017) Review on symmetric structures in ductile shear zones. International Journal of Earth Sciences 106, 1453–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mukherjee S (2019) Introduction to “Tectonics and Structural Geology: Indian Context”. In: Mukherjee S (ed) Tectonics and structural geology: Indian context. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, pp 1–5. ISBN: 978-3-319-99340-9Google Scholar
  35. Mukherjee S, Koyi HA (2010a) Higher Himalayan Shear Zone, Zanskar Section- microstructural studies & extrusion mechanism by a combination of simple shear & channel flow. International Journal of Earth Sciences 99, 1083–1110Google Scholar
  36. Mukherjee S, Koyi HA (2010b) Higher Himalayan Shear Zone, Sutlej section- structural geology & extrusion mechanism by various combinations of simple shear, pure shear & channel flow in shifting modes. International Journal of Earth Sciences 99, 1267–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mukherjee S, Koyi HA, Talbot CJ (2012) Implications of channel flow analogue models in extrusion of the Higher Himalayan Shear Zone with special reference to the out-of-sequence thrusting. International Journal of Earth Sciences 101, 253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mukherjee S, Punekar J, Mahadani T, Mukherjee R (2015) A review on intrafolial folds and their morphologies from the detachments of the western Indian Higher Himalaya. In: Mukherjee S, Mulchrone KF (eds) Ductile Shear Zones: From Micro- to Macro-scales. Wiley Blackwell, pp 182–205Google Scholar
  39. Panikkar SV, Subramanyan V (1997) Landslide hazard analysis of the area around DehraDun and Mussoorie, Uttar Pradesh. Current Science 73, 1117–1123Google Scholar
  40. Pant PD, Luirei K (1999) Malpa rockfalls of 18 August 1998 in the Northeastern Kumaun Himalaya. Journal of the Geological Society of India 54, 415–420Google Scholar
  41. Paul SK, Mahajan AK (1999) Malpa rockfall disaster, Kali valley, Kumaun Himalaya. Current Science 76, 485–487Google Scholar
  42. Peacock DCP, Nixon CW, Rotevatn A, Sanderson DJ, Zuluaga LF (2017) Interacting faults. Journal of Structural Geology 97, 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Puniya MK, Joshi P, Pant PD (2013) Geological investigation of Nainital Bypass: a special emphasis on slope stability analysis, Kumaun Lesser Himalaya. In: Himalayan vulnerability, Uttarakhand, 2013: learning for planning and action. Xpressions Print & Graphics Pvt. Ltd. pp 65–72Google Scholar
  44. Romana M (1985) New adjustment ratings for application of Bieniawski classification to slopes. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the role of rock mechanics in excavations for mining and civil works. International Society of Rock Mechanics, Zacatecas, pp 49–53Google Scholar
  45. Sah N, Kumar M, Upadhyay R, Dutt S (2018) Hill slope instability of Nainital City. Kumaun Lesser Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shipton ZK, Cowie PA (2001) Damage zone and slip-surface evolution over mm to km scales in high-porosity Navajo sandstone, Utah. Journal of Structural Geology 23, 1823–1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shipton ZK, Cowie PA (2003) A conceptual model for the origin of fault damage zone structures in high-porosity sandstone. Journal of Structural Geology 25, 333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stead D, Eberhardt E (2013a) Understanding the mechanics of large landslides. Italian Journal of Engineering Geology and Environment Book Series (6), 85–108Google Scholar
  49. Stead D, Eberhardt E (2013b) Understanding the mechanics of large landslides. Italian Journal of Engineering Geology and Environment, 85–109Google Scholar
  50. Stead D, Wolter A (2015) A critical review of rock slope failure mechanism: the importance of structural geology. Journal of structural Geology 74, 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valdiya KS (1980) Geology of Kumaun Lesser Himalaya. Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  52. Vanik N, Shaikh H, Mukherjee S, Maurya DM, Chamyal LS (2018) Post-Deccan trap stress reorientation under transpression: evidence from fault slip analyses from SW Saurashtra, western India. Journal of Geodynamics, 121, 9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohit Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ramesh Chander Joshi
    • 2
  • Pitamber Dutt Pant
    • 3
  1. 1.National Geotechnical FacilitySurvey of IndiaDehradunIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeographyKumaun UniversityNainitalIndia
  3. 3.Department of GeologyKumaun UniversityNainitalIndia

Personalised recommendations