Advertisement

Quantifying the Emergence of New Domains: Using Cybersecurity as a Case

  • Xiaoli Hu
  • Zhiyong Feng
  • Shizhan Chen
  • Dongxiao He
  • Keman Huang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11062)

Abstract

One of the learning tasks which play central roles in the knowledge discovery field is to understand the content of a corpus such that one can efficiently understand the potential knowledge of data texts. Moreover, the availability of various big scholarly data enables us to develop methods for digging deep into the generation of new domains. In this paper, especially, we take cybersecurity disciplinary as an example, collect the relevant data from Microsoft Academic, and then extract the citation and reference relations among different domains. We further propose the domain-derived space, representing the inspiration relations for the emergence domains, by identifying the emergence of domains and the significant derived relations. In the context of the developed domain-derived space, we develop methods to study the growth of domains as well as the characteristics of its ancestral domains. The results reveal the dissipation of the interdisciplinary effect and the importance of a domain in its early stage for the emergence of new domains. These studies quantitatively analyze the trends and impact factors of domain derivation, providing a new research and forecast path for knowledge discovery.

Keywords

Domain-derived space Cybersecurity Knowledge discovery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 61502333, 61572350, 61672377.

References

  1. 1.
    Fischhoff, B., Weinberger, P.J., Millett, L.I.: Foundational Cybersecurity Research: Improving Science, Engineering, and Institutions. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (1969)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guo, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhu, S., Chi, Y., Gong, Y.: Knowledge discovery from citation networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 800–805 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guo, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhu, S., Chi, Y., Gong, Y.: Knowledge discovery from citation networks 26(4), 800–805 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hidalgo, C., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A.L., Hausmann, R.: The product space and its consequences for economic growth. In: APS Meeting, pp. 439–446 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Williamson, J.: The philosophy of science and its relation to machine learning. In: Gaber, M. (ed.) Scientific Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 77–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02788-8_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holzinger, A., et al.: On graph entropy measures for knowledge discovery from publication network data. In: Cuzzocrea, A., Kittl, C., Simos, D.E., Weippl, E., Xu, L. (eds.) CD-ARES 2013. LNCS, vol. 8127, pp. 354–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40511-2_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mangan, S., Alon, U.: Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100(21), 11980–11985 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petersen, A.M., Riccaboni, M., Stanley, H.E., Pammolli, F.: Persistence and uncertainty in the academic career. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109(14), 5213–8 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C., Barabási, A.L.: Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science 354(6312), aaf5239 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sinha, A., et al.: An overview of microsoft academic service (MAS) and applications, pp. 243–246 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sorenson, O., Fleming, L.: Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Res. Policy 33(10), 1615–1634 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vazhkudai, S.S., et al.: Constellation: a science graph network for scalable data and knowledge discovery in extreme-scale scientific collaborations. In: IEEE International Conference on Big Data, pp. 3052–3061 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, D., Song, C., Barabási, A.L.: Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 342(6154), 127–132 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wernicke, S., Rasche, F.: FANMOD: a tool for fast network motif detection. Bioinformatics 22(9), 1152–1153 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoli Hu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhiyong Feng
    • 1
    • 3
  • Shizhan Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dongxiao He
    • 1
    • 2
  • Keman Huang
    • 4
  1. 1.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and ApplicationTianjinChina
  2. 2.School of Computer Science and TechnologyTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  3. 3.School of Computer SoftwareTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  4. 4.Cybersecurity@MIT SloanMIT Sloan School of ManagementCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations